Their arguments goes both ways and we arrive
back at an argument of faith.
Not exact matches
Standing before two dozen hospital staff, he circles
back to the
argument he deployed earlier in the day, that «if the Senate did change, we could
at least confront the President with some difficult choices.»
Think
back at the last
argument you had with so much
at stake.
Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go
back to church again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling
at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences
at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the
arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.
My
argument is that we are called to project a vision of a just society that would be
at once attractive to middle class North Americans and also get us off the
backs of oppressed people who are seeking liberation.
This line of
argument is actually a reversion
back to the other prong of Euthyphro's dilemma arguing that whatever god does is good, i.e. good is
at the whim of god.
I think people get pulled into these
arguments... how many times did the Pharisees seek to get Jesus to commit to» one side or the other» and he would come
back at them from a place they were not expecting.
Her
argument against this position, as best I can discern and summarize it, is that each new divine occasion would in turn be irresistibly objectified or «superjected» (she uses this as a verb)
back into the world, which would «bind the present irrevocably to the past, to sacrifice spontaneity and autonomy
at the altar of necessity» (p. 164).
First he attempted to apply a logical
argument, whose history extends
back at least as far as Cicero's On Divination.4 According to this view, contingency (chance) and foreknowledge (fate) are contradictory assertions because a contingent event, being unnecessitated, can not be known until it occurs.
You need to stop being so vindictive towards others, maybe read a book, go have sex, whatever you need to calm down, then come
back and realize that no one is attacking you, im sure people are laughing
at this conversation, but not because of what it in but just because its pointless, you bring up the same things OVER and OVER again and then accuse me of having spuratic
arguments?
The Futurity article
at least has some statistics, but it doesn't seem to
back your
argument.
There is an
argument for cutting
back America's collective security arrangements, but if you are going to cut them
back so suddenly, you probably shouldn't be cutting the military very much or
at all.
This can be obscured as one looks
at a library full of volumes on Christian doctrine or looks
back at the history of Christendom with its
arguments and bloody wars.
Digressing
back to the point, you're certainly right that Jesus set about to leaven existing communities with the gospel and redeem them; no
argument at all there.
Well, FAITH, there's the problem... that gibberish in the bible was just made up by «some guy» to keep the peasants behaving in a manner that whomever wrote it thought was a good way to behave... some of those guys were wise, yes, and there are benefits to following some of the «guidelines» set forth in the Bible... but it's a circular
argument to use the Bible as a reason to have faith, because you have to first BELIEVE in the deity, THEN believe that the deity inspired the writings, THEN you can take the writings as «truth»... I'm two steps
back, not believing in the deity
at all (Yay, Atheists!
The most powerful of the pro-choice
arguments was that failure to legalize abortion would leave five to ten thousand women a year bleeding to death from coat - hanger abortions or dying from systemic infections incurred
at the hands of «
back - alley butchers.»
Really, if you go
back and look
at it, many of these early
arguments were primarily about power and control, but we'll leave that alone for now...
i can't argue the
argument of a creator, i can only ask for proof which is often thrown
back at me for asking but in reality the burden of proof lays with those that believe beyond a doubt that what is IS what was created by said god (s).
Kant brought us
back to the
argument from conscience; we had the inner assurance of being
at issue with the dictates of a Will, surely not less personal than our own.
Yet you have the gall to cross your arms, stare
at the huge body of empirical evidence, and bleat, «It's improbable,» with nothing but logically unsound
arguments from incredulity to
back you up.
This works on some people, but others simply respond with the same
argument thrown right
back at you: «No.
These two chapters build on much that has gone before in the letter, so in looking
at them in detail it will be necessary to refer
back to some previous
arguments.
The Special One also confirmed that Costa snapped
back at him during their halftime
argument during the Champions League clash with Maccabi Tel Aviv during the week, and though he tried to play down the indecent he did confirm that the Spanish international swore
at him.
The whole «we should've got Cesc
back»
argument is just a lot of fans getting frustrated with our season whilst he prospers
at Chelsea.
If anything there's an
argument for playing five
at the
back instead of three, though I think we should stick with our 4 -2-3-1 formation.
Also United can have Matic play in a more advanced central role is because they play with 4
at the
back and not 3
at the
back so your
argument is irrelevant as you're not even comparing the same system.
To be honest Fred I'm P off with this site im100 % sure Spurs fans are on here or why would someone want a left
back at CB, either Spurs fans or the usual Tv arsenal fans, they can't even put a decent
argument, so it's easy to thumb down, there's only a few on here who I do Ramadan their posts, Caraig, Phillnosethompson, arseovertit, twig, yourself, robinvanpayslip, and a few others who make decent
arguments either way, and others are just to brainwashed to see what's wrong,
I've
backed the 68 year - old on a number of occasions, as well as voicing some concerns
at times, but as we look destined to miss out on Champions League football for the second season running, I'm not sure there can be any
argument against giving the reins over to somebody else.
You
arguments would have a lot more traction on the
back of half a dozen defeats — appears slightly crazy
at present.
My recent experience of Dave Jones comes mainly from the six games against Leicester since we started
back in the Championship
at the start of last season so that's largely where the tactical
argument comes from.
Personally I think there's an
argument for 3
at the
back today but we'll see what AW goes with.
However, the
argument remains that he is arguably the fourth - choice centre -
back at the club, and below him is Cameron Carter - Vickers, do Spurs need five centre -
backs?
Well, not
at the very beginning of the season any way; I have trouble imagining him taking to the field along side Vermaelen
at Anfield and I am not persuaded by the
argument that we wouldn't have paid ten million pounds just for
back up.
It's a crap
argument - especially when most every mom I work with is right
back here
at work, pumping away in the mothers room just 12 weeks after the birth of their baby.
,» In the piece, Dana comes out essentially right where I did, suggesting that we modify flavored milk rather than eliminating it entirely, and she
backs up her
arguments with many more facts and figures than I had
at hand when I wrote my own post.
The Cambridge Community Breastfeeding Group is arguing that in the long run this decision would add to hospital costs, an
argument backed by
at least one study which found each baby who isn't breastfed costs the health system on average $ 1500 more than a breastfed child.
But any actions would only be seen as legally valid if there was an
argument to fall
back on that they were being enacted on
at least someone's advice, and with some elected minister's consent.
At the same time, voters are supportive of what could be a key
argument for Cuomo's re-election bid: By a margin of 60 percent to 29 percent, voters
back a governor with experience in politics versus someone who is new.
TN: I think one of the interesting things about the
argument for the need to strip things
back to basics is that it comes
at a time when a lot of the academic literature has gone the other way and is obsessed with adding things on.
Right around 8 p.m. last night — just as Capital Tonight's Kaitlyn Ross was preparing to go live from outside the Senate chamber with me
back at the studio — a major
argument broke out right behind her between Assemblyman Vito Lopez and Micah Lasher, the Bloomberg administration's in - house lobbyist.
His
arguments were forcefully
backed up by comments from the German finance minister, Wolfgang Schauble, who hit out
at Britain's attitude in a private dinner attended by the UK's ambassador.
Farley, a partner
at the equity firm Mistral Capital, launched her effort with a video that borrowed an
argument recently deployed by Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo: New York State pays roughly more in federal taxes ($ 40 billion in 2016, she noted) than it gets
back in federal aid — money, Farley said, that could be used to rebuild state infrastructure and boost education, among other things.
As prosecutors make their closing
arguments, TRD takes a look
back at the events leading up to the criminal trial
The part the Dems are particularly interested in comes
at the tail end of the report, highlighting a lawsuit brought against Grimm
back in the summer of 2000 by a former NYPD officer who claimed Grimm brandished a gun and misused his FBI authority after getting into an
argument with another man over a woman (Grimm's date, the man's estanged wife).
Both agencies acted with official city and state misconduct, and in both cases, honest, credible evidence was repeatedly dismissed and ignored, and so was the corruption that remains to date — where knowingly false statements were made to discredit me (then later completely reversed during oral
argument by my accusers), and both the DOI investigators (who appeared
at my doorstep many times to collect evidence) and MTA Office of the Inspector General investigators invited me
back to their headquarters (more than six times), from 1989 to 2008), and continued to take no action to restore and reinstate my city job, pension and social security contributions.
Redwood's
argument is that the UK is bound into the EU's trade policy by its membership of the customs union and that the EU's trade policy is to have no agreements with other countries
at all — thereby leaving both us and them on
back - up WTO trade terms when it comes to the rest of the world.
In fact, his attorneys don't plan to call any witnesses
at all, but instead will present only documents to
back up their
arguments.
State officials and the consultant studying sites for a new Buffalo train station are pushing
back against key elements of Rep. Brian Higgins»
argument for locating the facility
at Central Terminal.
«Essentially we have the beginning of a tsunami, where literally we could have a hole in our community with the closing of Sophie Finn and the closing of the Kingston Hospital campus right next door which I can see every day from my office,» said Gallo during a press conference which — as he paced
back and forth in the Common Council chambers before an audience of reporters, community members and
at least four school board trustees — seemed
at times similar to the delivery of an opening
argument at trial.
According to the reporter, Kingston Daily Freeman's Bill Kemble, the long - serving congressman came
at him after the cameras were off, resuming the
argument, poking his finger in his chest and putting his hands near his throat before
backing off.