Sentences with phrase «back benefits if»

25 % of Sum Assured is paid during the last 4 years of the term as money - back benefits if the insured survives till that period

She also would require the board to set public guidelines for the types of projects it will approve, including a minimum number of «quality» jobs that must be created, and allow the agency to claw back benefits if those goals are not met.

Present welfare plans across Canada not only pay less than the poverty line — sometimes 20 to 40 per cent less — but also discourage work by clawing back benefits if more than $ 100 or so are earned.

Not exact matches

If you don't already have one, apply for an Amazon.com Store Card here, select your Amazon.com Store Card as the payment method for your entire order, and then select «get 5 % back, and bonus statement credits on select items charged to this card» as your promotional benefit.

If you choose 18 months but then decide you want to go back to work sooner, you'll be missing out on the higher benefit rate.

Limiting beliefs will stop you from getting the full benefit of any experience, and can hold you back from learning and growing — if you're unwilling to leave your comfort zone, you'll be stuck wherever you are today.

If you find yourself throwing money at every promotional opportunity, take a step back and realize the benefits of planning.

If you can rent in your desired area for much cheaper than a mortgage and other housing costs would set you back, you may benefit from renting a while longer and saving or investing the difference in monthly expenses.

«If it doesn't benefit their life in a way they can understand, they will simply go back to what they've done before.

Be sure to back up your statements and explain how your new way of doing things will benefit them, solve a problem or, if it is a work situation, improve productivity.

If you're a young startup without extensive funding, one of the bargaining chips in your back pocket is offering equity in lieu of a higher salary or better benefits.

Noble says the restructuring plan, which has the backing of over 83 percent of its senior creditors, will benefit all stakeholders and an insolvency is the only alternative if shareholders do not approve its proposal.

How come your Social Security benefits go back to the government if you die without a surviving spouse?

Even if you only have $ 50 a month to start investing with, don't allow that to hold you back; starting small will help you develop the discipline of investing, which will reap you benefits in the future.

Finally, if you die before the loan is paid back, the loan amount will be deducted from the death benefit your beneficiaries receive.

If you go back and study which company benefited the most from that program, it was Epic.

The benefit is paid monthly and not tied to retention, so employees don't have to pay it back if they leave.

If you are currently in default on a federal student loan and plan to go back to school, you may benefit from a direct consolidation loan.

If you are looking for pure cash back, you can do that too, but the benefits come on strong for travel.

In addition to all of the benefits that are given to a person with aCiTrades VIP Managed Account this level user will also get an optional corporate account feature, have interest added to the account balance, have insurance protection on the account, receive a 150 % cash back bonus if desired and have a personal debit card tied to the account for instant access to the money placed in it at any time.

Now with the benefit of hindsight, we can look back over this event to see if any fluctuations or major changes have occurred.

If so, and if you meet income limits, you could benefit from a government - backed USDA home loaIf so, and if you meet income limits, you could benefit from a government - backed USDA home loaif you meet income limits, you could benefit from a government - backed USDA home loan.

If you were to die before paying back your policy loan, the loan balance plus interest accrued is taken out of the death benefit given to your beneficiaries.

If your benefits have been reduced due to earning too much prior to reaching your FRA, you will get these benefits back at your FRA when your monthly Social Security check will be increased to account for benefits withheld earlier due to excess earnings.3

The big benefit is that you have to do the evaluation once and check back every year if it still works for you.

If, on the other hand, your credit report has mistakes in it that you have already corrected and that keep coming back, or that you can prove are mistakes, you may benefit from what's called rapid rescoring.

These concepts are generally used in spammier instances — such as «link wheels» or other less than favorable examples where links can easily be pushed at authoritative domains — with the hope that the benefit passed back to our site is superior to what will have been gained if the link had been pointed direct.

But if you are concerned that big stocks are overvalued, consider a broader portfolio such as Vanguard Index Total Stock Market (17.6 %), a fund keyed to the Wilshire 5000 index of virtually all publicly traded stocks in the U.S. With a total - market index fund, you'll benefit proportionally when small stocks bounce back, since they're automatically included in the portfolio package.

It all circles back to my belief that younger investors should focus on RE for appreciation and tax benefits, which will give them the experience to handle the notes if they go bad when they're investing for cash flow later in life.

Thank you for giving me the chance to express out but still I am hurt and a nice word will cool it of and guide me if wrong and about quitting I would because what I am doing now at CNN is taking almost my whole time since the Quran burnning issue and would out doubt I will go back to it and that's why I mentioned earlier that we back here worry about our daily bread and water for family support but needed from you in the free world to notice us out there and have your say on behalf of all heavenly beliefs that what is happening is wrong, One Nation Calamities to other nations benefit, profit?!

But, since this is a Democratic Party initiative, perhaps you can kindly ask your Democratic representative if there is no place for people of sincere belief to continue the great work that they do, including the benefits of religious exemption that go back decades.

No one enjoys legalism, but if the costs of football outweigh its benefits» and they well may» it may be best for many to take a step back from it and point youths to concentrate on less violent sports.

If we all just take a step back and really reflect on our beliefs and how to articulate them, humanity can benefit as a whole, regardless of who is «right».

Perhaps the nation as a whole would benefit if the good citizens of New England went back to chuch in greater numbers...

If you are lucky we might let you marry but there is no benefit to us so it will get pushed to the back of the pile.

If you have been hearing the buzz about infrared sauna benefits and wondering if there's any science to back it up, the answer is yeIf you have been hearing the buzz about infrared sauna benefits and wondering if there's any science to back it up, the answer is yeif there's any science to back it up, the answer is yes!

Even if you aren't gluten - sensitive, or cutting back on the grains, coconut flour pancakes have so many benefits!

if we had a dm and back up CB, most would not have cared if any striker had come (they would give that player the benefit of the doubt)...

If Arsene can't channel his hunger and fire to the benefit of the team, then it is his management that is a problem and holding the team back not AS7.

I am giving Kawhi the benefit of the doubt, if he is not ready then he is not ready to come back and be that superstar of the league who can compete with the James Harden, Russell Webstrook, LeBron James, Anthony Davis, Giannis Antetokounmpo of the league..

I think Walcott will benefit a lot from Giroud's style of play next season if Wenger goes back to deploying him as a wide forward next season.

The decision of the FA is of no benefit to Arsenal, the ban will not give back arsenal points lost, to tell the truth i would have felt happier if it was the referee who got the ban with his poor officiating.

In other news, our team seems to be rounding nicely into form, with a productive off - season and several new additions already settling in, there seems to be a renewed sense of confidence in the air... our well - oiled machine has conducted business again early this year, so we can just sit back, kick our feet up and watch all those other suckers scramble to make panic moves in the 11th hour... of course, we need to tie up a few loose ends but our team of savvy negotiators, under the tutelage of our faithful leader, will perform their usual magic with ample time to spare... I have to laugh when I look around the soccer world and see all those teams look upon us with envy and scorn as they struggle to mimic our seemingly infallible business model... thank goodness the powers that be had the foresight and fortitude to resist the temptations of the modern football era... instead of listening to all the experts and simply taking the easy way out by making the necessary improvements on the field and in the front office, we chose the path never traveled... we are truly pioneers in our field... sometimes you just have to have faith in the people that have always conducted themselves in a respectful and honest fashion... most fans aren't so fortunate, they will never know what it's like to follow a team that treats everyone in and around the club as if they were an extended member of the family... all for one I say... so when you wake up this morning, please try not to gloat when you see rival fans pacing back and forth waiting for their respective teams to pull the usual panic buys, just say nothing and be thankful that it isn't you... like I've always said, this is why you stay the course... this is when the real benefits of having someone in charge for over 2 decades really pays off... have a great day fellow Gunners

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Fred — I think Ozil will benefit from the Santi / Rambo / Coq combo behind him, a settled and improved back 4 behind them and if all else fails we have The Wall in goal.

If given a proper strong in position defensive lineup our front boys will only benefit knowing the back can do its job and wont need to keep running back to our own box.

I think it will really benefit him if he is sent out loan (not now but hopefully jan when gabriel and mert are back) he luks a real gem

Ozil needs to be played more centrally if we hope to benefit from his creativity with the ball and Welbeck's first touch is far too sloppy to be played along side Lacazette... we need to find a formation which allows more service to those making runs from the middle of the pitch... Lacazette can not play so much with his back to goal or we're simply playing the same unsuccessful offensive scheme we played with Giroud, who is much better in that type of role... I can only hope we keep Sanchez and purchase a true defensive midfielder then switch to a 4 -4-1-1, which allows us to have Ozil play more centrally with Sead and Sanchez on the left side and Ox and Bellerin on the right, which would stretch defences so much that we could overwhelm most opponents with both runs in behind and overlapping runs out wide

PLEASE TREAT THIS AS A BACK UP AS THE BENEFITS ARE NOT A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT, WE RECOMMEND YOU TAKE OUT YOUR OWN POLICY OR CHECK IF YOU ARE ON YOUR FAMILY»S POLICY.

If he's healthy, he would be a great addition with the added benefit of allowing Denver to move Leary back to his natural LG spot, which helps Bolles immensely.