Not exact matches
Rep. Chris Gibson, touting new
federal education legislation that, if passed, would put many
policy decisions
back in the hands of the state, urged Albany to roll
back the Common Core learning standards, essentially calling out Cuomo.
For every
policy that a state department
education or the
federal government erects in connection with or reliant on summative assessment data, however, the longer it will take states to
back off of «Measurement 2.0,» and realize the potential of formative assessment as a teaching, learning, and accountability tool.
The new Every Student Succeeds Act, which takes full effect in the 2017 - 18 school year, rolls
back much of the
federal government's big footprint in
education policy, on everything from testing and teacher quality to low - performing schools.
He once spoke movingly about the virtues of NCLB, calling it «an effort to end decades of failed
federal education policy that allowed billions of taxpayer dollars to be spent without insisting on results for students» But that was before Boehner had to corral a caucus full of Tea Party -
backed freshmen.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), which goes into full effect in the 2018 — 19 school year, rolled
back much of the
federal government's big footprint in
education policy, on everything from testing and teacher quality to low - performing schools.
When the dust settles from the midterm elections,
federal lawmakers — the re-elected and losers alike — will head
back to Washington for a lame - duck session with a long to - do list that could have broad implications for
education policy over the next year.
But there's still a possibility Indiana could go
back to PARCC, despite Hoosier concerns about
federal intrusion into state
education policy.
Kline's original goal was to move away from an omnibus approach to
federal education policy as represented by No Child and offer up five bills that would essentially revert
back to the days before the passage of No Child, when
federal dollars were handed out to states without showing any results.
The financial incentives for states to implement
federal education policies have been scaled
back, leaving
education policy decisions to be made by the state, and at times, local policymakers.
While Coates doesn't touch on
education policy, he essentially makes a strong historical case for why reformers (especially increasingly erstwhile conservatives in the movement) must go
back to embracing accountability measures and a strong
federal role in
education policymaking that, along with other changes in American society, are key to helping children from poor and minority households (as well as their families and communities) attain economic and social equality.
The Every Student Succeeds Act ends the
back - seat driving of the
federal government in
education policy.
The ESSA transfers the bulk of
education policy and decision making from the
federal government
back to state and local control.
ESSA will shift considerable responsibility for
education policy and accountability from the
federal government
back to the states.
Last year the House passed the Student Success Act, a broad based reform of
federal education policy that would maintain the high standards the President called for while giving state and local school districts
back the money and authority they need to meet those standards.
As a TeachPlus Teacher - In - Residence, she conducts research and
policy analysis on
federal policies related to
education and reform — a role that allows her to connect
back to her time as a Congressional staffer for Senator Paul Wellstone and Senator Tammy Baldwin when she represented the 2nd District of Wisconsin.
DeVos's remarks began the event on a hopeful note, and those gathered seemed excited about the possibility of
federal backing for new, pro —
education freedom
policies.
This is because the
federal government ultimately amplifies
education policy decisions made at the state level, especially by those reform - minded governors and legislators (along with reformers) who also seek help from the
federal level to beat
back opposition to their efforts by entrenched traditionalist interests.
On the other hand, added Schuster — citing a thesis being circulated at the time by Chester Finn, then a faculty member at Vanderbilt — it might be possible for
education advocates to rally around a new agenda, one powerful enough to attract widespread support and perhaps even bring
federal policy makers
back into the fold.
«While some of the specifics in these proposals have merit, the overarching effect of these
policies would be to set
education reform
back by more than two decades,» DFER Director of
Federal Policy Charles Barone said.
We also applaud the Secretary of
Education's intent to pull
back from the unrealistic timelines and the punishments invoked on schools in current
federal policy.
Advocates, parents, and policymakers must push
back against these
policies to ensure that all children, including those with disabilities, get the
education they deserve and is afforded to them by
federal law.
The current Australian Indigenous health
policy environment has developed in parallel with increasing recognition of broader concepts of health that involve social determinants — including peace,
education and social justice, and equity — as enunciated in documents such as the Ottawa Charter11 and repeated in Australian strategic documents such as the Ways forward blueprint for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mental health.12 Unfortunately, the implementation of such strategies appears to be held
back by a lack of coordination between
federal and state governments and departments in terms of effective administrative responsibility for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health and social determinants.