Not exact matches
for example... you can go
back in
ice core
samples as far as 800,000 years, and still locked in the
ice is a tiny amount of the atmoshpere from that time, telliing us volumes of information.
Doc We have
ice core
samples going
back 800,000 years.
Also,
Ice core
samples that go
back as far as 800,000 years have atmospheric gasses trapped within, so give a source to determine the make - up of the air, showing consistant level of carbon... directly refuting the AiG site that claimns the air has changed.
Farooqi drove to London, took more blood
samples, packed them in a bucket of
ice, and sped
back to Cambridge.
But the 100
ice core
samples in Greenland and Antarctica going
back 800,000 years including over two dozen inter-glacials when large differences in CO2 levels and temperatures were measured.
Data on greenhouse gas abundances going
back beyond a million years, that is, beyond the reach of antarctic
ice cores, are still rather uncertain, but analysis of geological
samples suggests that the warm
ice - free periods coincide with high atmospheric CO2 levels.
«It potentially does,» admits Jones, but says that analyses using other methods — proxy temperature markers from
ice core
samples, for example — still show much the same temperature change over the past 1,000 years,
backing up Mann's hockey stick.
Turn the lights out go
back to the stone age climate change has been changing for thousands of years look at
ice core
samples.
Scientists dig deep into the rock and sand of the sea floor to
sample Earth's climate history many millions of years ago, since the oldest
ice cores go
back only 850,000 years.
The facility, which has some
ice samples going as far
back as 1958, is meant to be a permanent repository, but it's running out of room.
And scientists can
sample ice cores, permafrost records, and tree rings to make some assumptions about the sea
ice extent going
back 1,500 years.
SD: We have actual
samples of air from
ice cores going
back over 800,000 years, and CO2 has never been this high in that time.
«They're talking about the instrumental data which is unaltered — but they're talking about proxy data going further
back in time, a thousand years, and it's just about how you add on the last few years, because when you get proxy data you
sample things like tree rings and
ice cores, and they don't always have the last few years.
He said scientists have been able to correlate changes in atmospheric temperature with changes in levels of carbon dioxide going
back more than 500,000 years by analyzing
ice core
samples and the CO2 bubbles trapped inside.
More importantly, in all the «small cycle» warming seen in the past millions of years, based on data taken from
samples of
ice going
back that far, we have never seen warming ramping up this far.
Ice core
samples become very hard to analyze the further one goes
back in time, so I am not sure exactly how good it is for determining climate in the deep past.