Sentences with phrase «back money lent»

Once the last homeowner on the title dies, moves or sells the home, your lender will sell the home to make back the money lent to them.

Effectively it is lending you back the money you lent it, except charging you much more.

Banks have stopped lending money to each other as there is no assurance of being refunded back the money they lend out.

A lender or credit card provider who looks at your credit score will be able to determine right away if you're a borrower who can be trusted to pay back the money they lend you.

Most people don't need a score to know if they will pay themselves back the money they lend themselves....

Not exact matches

By making lending cheaper, consumers, corporations and governments would be able to borrow money inexpensively and put those dollars back into the economy, whether by buying goods or investing in businesses.

Repak: While borrowing from friends or family is better than borrowing from a bank and especially those high - interest payday loans, only lend money if you're fine with never getting it back.

Title III was meant to help businesses raise money when banks pulled back from lending in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

Glickman put in $ 80,000 of his own money over time and would occasionally make short - term loans to the company; later his father would end up lending the company $ 100,000, which was paid back in full, with interest, within a year.

When you buy bonds from a corporation, government or other entity, you're lending money to be paid back with interest at a specified time.

February 10: The U.S. Fed expands the Term Asset - Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which lends money to investors to buy securities backed by loans, thereby allowing banks to provide more Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF), which lends money to investors to buy securities backed by loans, thereby allowing banks to provide more backed by loans, thereby allowing banks to provide more loans.

It's starting to sound like the mortgage fraud scandal where banks were lending people money to buy houses when they knew they couldn't pay it back.

For example, in the Philippines the growing population of overseas workers sending money back home has lead to the rise of financial technology (fintech) apps that offer a variety of new, low - cost services such as remittance payments, transfers, and lending that were otherwise expensive and dominated by a few groups.

Back when banks lent people money to buy homes and then sat around waiting for interest payments, no one thought to explore how quickly homeowners would refinance their mortgages if interest rates fell.

I have been debating where to start throwing my money, and i have started up a bit with lending club, and vanguard index funds, but most of the hype and youtube videos i see, are people praising divide stocks, and how you can «reinvest that free money back into the stock for more free money!»

Without this backing guarantee, banks would see small business lending as too risky and elect not to loan the prospective entrepreneur money, stifling small business.

When you lend money to someone, the best you can hope for is to get it back, plus interest.»

Those who invest in and lend money to companies worry that if the company fails, they won't get their money back after the dust settles.

In the event of a default the property is sold and the bank gets all its money back because they are in a full equity position, the amount lent is less than the total value of the asset so they are only out the time it takes to get the property sold.

Which lending option is right for you depends on a number of factors, such as how much equity you have, how long you plan to stay in your home and if you want to receive money back.

Because those securities are backed by CMHC, not the banks themselves, they're able to go out and lend that freed - up money to new homebuyers at lower prices, which adds fuel to Canada's housing fire.

I think that a lot of personal lenders may prefer to lend money to those whom they knew would pay them back on a consistent basis.

So even though you are paying the bank back for lending you mortgage funds, you're also putting money toward the equity in the home you own.

Whereas when you know that when banks — and this is where the Bank of England must deserve a big pat on the back from people like ourselves that they came out and publicly said, as a highly respected official organization, banks create money when they lend, and, therefore, as well as providing --

However, at present the banks are not eager to lend a lot of money to the private sector — private sector credit demand has also decreased and in fact become negative (more loans are paid back than are taken out).

(unfortunately banks do nt buy in to we will win the league for the next decade to give out money) from the cub before they lend then shed lots of cash, and this unfortunately leads to clubs putting up there ticket prices to reflect the cost of big progress, so people sometimes have to realize that the club has to find a way to make club grow, and if they do nt have deep pocketed owners then they have to pitch to the banks for a loan, like we did all those years ago an we are just over the worst of it now we have paid our dues and are now getting back among the big boys again.

To be sure, he didn't go into everything — how he'd take lunch money off schoolmates in Bessemer, Ala. and lend it back to them, with interest; how he'd pay one kid to beat up on another; how he hit a cousin, a girl, with a baseball bat when she tried to take away a Ping - Pong paddle; or how he helped stone to death a local minister's pig.

The problem is that once you start with lending you are spending money that you don't have and you have to pay it back, along with huge interest fees and other finance charges.

In principle these countries have lent the US money, at 0 % interest, to buy these banknotes, and could sell them back any time they chose.

It's true people lending do expect to get back money plus some profit — or they should, if they are rational, which isn't true as often as you'd think — however all that does is lead to inflation, and possibly more inflation after that, which I already acknowledged.

But they would be on the lookout for one another: the moment no other bank is willing to lend to you, they run the risk of needing some of that money back, and having to be the one to admit it's not there anymore.

«The tests for these changes at RBS are whether they see the taxpayer ultimately get its money back and whether they actually boost business lending and radically transform this bank to put an end to business as usual,» shadow chancellor Ed Balls said.

Here, a bank will lend you money and expect you to pay it back, with interest.

That's right, investors are willingly lending money with the expectation they'll be paid back less than they loaned.

If you are in the business of lending money, what you want to know about a potential borrower boils down to a simple question: will this person pay me back?

Most creditors consider a «poor» score to represent a serious risk: If they extend you credit or lend you money, they know there is a good chance you will not pay them back.

No lender will be willing to lend you the money you will not be able to pay back.

In other words, are they likely to get their money back from us after they lend it?

At the end of the day, the bank wants to get the money in lent you back.

It is always a better option to leave the risk with financial lending institutions, if you have any doubts whatsoever of paying back the money borrowed from those close to you.

Of course, the money you're paying back to your cousin who lent you a few hundred bucks last month is not an official debt, so cross that off the list, too.

'' income share agreement that lends money to students who agree to pay back a set percentage of their salaries (up to 3.97 %) for nine years (with a cap on how much a student might have to pay back).

Of course, it is unlikely any bank will raise your credit limit because you've already exceeded it and don't have any more money, as lending money to people who have just indicated that they will have trouble paying it back is bad for business.

For example, Purdue University started a «Back a Boiler» income share agreement that lends money to students who agree to pay back a set percentage of their salaries (up to 3.97 %) for nine years (with a cap on how much a student might have to pay baBack a Boiler» income share agreement that lends money to students who agree to pay back a set percentage of their salaries (up to 3.97 %) for nine years (with a cap on how much a student might have to pay baback a set percentage of their salaries (up to 3.97 %) for nine years (with a cap on how much a student might have to pay backback).

In practise though, lenders aren't so keen on that scenario, they would rather have shareholders sharing the risk, and lending a less than 100 % proportion of the total of a companies finance means they are much more likely to get their money back if things go horribly wrong.

This means that if you default on repayment of the loan, the lending agency can only take legal action to get their money back.

Essentially, with them taking a risk by lending you money, they are taking a risk of you not paying it back.

Nobody wants to lend money knowing they will never get it back.

If you lent money that you never got back, it's considered a bad debt, which might make you eligible for a tax rebate.

I can't believe the number of people who lend their hard earned money to people who never pay them back.