Sentences with phrase «back radiation measurements»
It's going to be close (I think) to their back radiation measurements of 110 - 120w / m ^ 2 summer.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/ Not exact matches
Surface measurements find more longwave radiation returning back to Earth at these same wavelengths.
''... Satellite measurements confirm less longwave radiation is escaping to space... Surface measurements find more longwave radiation returning back to Earth at these same wavelengths.»
CO2 traps heat According to radiative physics and decades of laboratory measurements, increased CO2 in the atmosphere is expected / predicted to absorb more infrared radiation as it escapes back out to space.
Please show where I have relied on «computer models with an almost 100 % fail rate» for measurements of back radiation.
The Amazing Case of «Back Radiation» - Part One — all about DLR or «back radiation» and the measurements from ground stations around the woBack Radiation» - Part One — all about DLR or «back radiation» and the measurements from ground stations around the woback radiation» and the measurements from ground stations around the world.
''... Satellite measurements confirm less longwave radiation is escaping to space... Surface measurements find more longwave radiation returning back to Earth at these same wavelengths.»
It all comes down to this mistake and the «back radiation» which does not exist except as the artefact of the radiometer measurement.
Did you read SoD's comments (and the references therein) about measurement of «back radiation»?
If you have any measurements backed up by instrument readings, covering the total radiation spectrum, please provide them.
The 324W / m ^ 2 of back radiation is overstated because the wrong emissivity value of the atmosphere has been used in calculating that back radiation from measurements.
The measurements have been performed for the increase of the back radiation by approximately 100 W / m ^ 2 due to the appearance of clouds above the ocean as compared to the cloudless sky.
Call it «less cooling» or «back radiation» or «invisible pajamas» but the measurements and the math arrive at the same conclusion.
my percentages using data from Evans and Puckrin: Figure 1 shows the strong CO2 peak (Winter measurement) as noted by SoD in earlier comments, and in corresponding Table 2, we see that CO2 accounts for about 80 % of the back radiation on a water free basis.
Yet, the characteristics of clouds on which the back radiation is most dependent, such as cloud base, are not well determined from conventional space - based measurements and hence the need for missions such as CloudSat (e.g., Stephens et al. 2002; Haynes and Stephens 2007).