Sentences with phrase «back up any assertions on»

Make sure you can back up any assertions on your resume with some concrete details.

Not exact matches

I've been searching for textual references to back up this assertion, with mixed - ish results and no real smoking gun, but whatever — the fundamental holds: Central bankers should offer opinions on what fiscal policy ought to be when fiscal policy is a problem for them.

Nobody said it was an accident, you on the other hand argue that «go did it» with nothing to back up your assertion.

I would love to see what sort of thoughts you have on either question, then again as we can see from the begining of this thread, when people answered your intial idiotic assertions, you refused to even try to back them up, lets see what happens this time...

I did say, «I would love to see what sort of thoughts you have on either question, then again as we can see from the begining of this thread, when people answered your intial idiotic assertions, you refused to even try to back them up, lets see what happens this time...» And you proved me right!

And he offered no detail on where Labour would cut spending to back up his assertion that Labour would be more humane when it came to tackling the yawning budget deficit.»

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee made a $ 10,000 cable television buy Friday afternoon for an ad that pushes back on Colorado Rep. Mike Coffman's assertion that he'd stand up to Donald Trump if he's elected president.

Lillikas's assertion that Cypriots would rather leave the euro than meet the troika's demands are backed up by an opinion poll published on Thursday.

With certain characters (who shall remain nameless to avoid spoilers), you can even push them too far with your questioning and result in them refusing to cooperate, similar to L.A. Noire (though in Aviary Attorney this is not dependent on whether you have evidence to back up your assertions; you can simply frighten away characters by being too forceful).

As you can see in the chart below, the Xbox One X's assertion that it is the most powerful console on the market can be backed up in a number of ways.

What I have said is that your assertion that some unspecified geoengineering scheme or schemes «CAN» — and that was your word, «CAN», not «conceivably might» or «possibly could», but «CAN» — control the Earth's temperature as accurately and reliably as a simple elecromechanical on / off thermostat controls a furnace, has no evidence whatsoever to back it up.

Answering of continually answering my question with a question why don't you merely back up your assertions by pointing me to some studies that could tell all of us on this forum what temperature reduction could be expected by the aggressive mitigation measures proposed.

But as journalism, its analysis and conclusions should rest as often as is possible on some form of original reporting or on peer - reviewed or government - sponsored research to back up significant assertions of fact.

Here's what is required (leaving aside Theresa May's electorally hamstrung inability to deliver much of it): The entire cabinet and every business leader the government's black book can muster, on stage for the launch of the new strategy; an explicit declaration that this, full decarbonization of the economy, is the post-Brexit economic strategy; clear and attractive retail policies, such as a diesel scrappage scheme, tax breaks for green investment, new apprenticeships, a green home building program; an open invitation to all opposition party leaders to share a platform to support the plan with a declaration that while they may not agree on every component they fully endorse the over-arching goal; a willingness to shame those party leaders who play party politics and refuse to turn up; a fortnight - long program where each day sees a new cabinet member explain how the plan will transform parts of the economy; a Royal Commission on the flaws of GDP as an economic measure and the viability of alternative quality of life metrics; and, yes, a brave assertion that carbon intensive industries will have to transform or be scaled back, backed by a decarbonization adaptation fund to help affected communities respond to this global trend.

But scroll up through the comments and you will see eleven prior ones from Rado going back three days to # 10 where Rado first makes an assertion that Connolley has to correct, and then, on raising complaints about bias, asks about where to complain... followed by one more gem in his comment # 11:

«With very few exceptions, governments all over the world have fallen into the trap of paying renewable energy scammers on the basis that it is necessary, at least politically, to be seen to be doing something about climate change,» Sloan writes, before providing readers with an avalanche of economic data to back up her assertion.

A little while back I wrote about a planned 8,100 cow mega-dairy, and followed up on a spokesperson's astounding assertion that «cows do not belong in fields.»