Sentences with phrase «back up his point of»

Matt, you're the one vomiting studies out to back up your point of view... but you don't want to actually discuss the merits of the study itself?

This backs up the point of the video.

The effectiveness of voucher and charter school programs has long been debated, and pro and con camps both cite studies to back up their points of view.

He has spoken several times over the last few years about where publishing is going and he never fails to offer rich and convincing arguments to back up his point of view.

Danny's General Contractor and negotiation skills are superb - he has years of experience in both to back up his point of view and does consider the long game for all parties involved.

Not exact matches

In the introduction to a series that will look back at the events leading up to the election, Silver seems on the defensive somewhat, justifying his analysis of the poll results and pointing out that he predicted Clinton would be weak with the Electoral College and that Trump might prevail.

That point isn't lost on Steve Roberson, the co-founder and technical lead of Start - Up Hire, a new job site for venture capital - backed companies.

More research out of Harvard University backs up Gruman's point.

On his Twitter page, Ernie pointed out that seemingly reasonable assumptions back at the time of the January 2001 surplus celebration would have added up to a $ 15 trillion cumulative budget surplus through 2028.

But at some point, you're the one who ends up vomiting in the bathroom instead of sitting back, patting your belly with satisfaction.

If you get to that point, you can then slowly inch your prices back up (assuming you retain the same level of customer service) and expand your profit margins.

After watching Ackerley lunging cross-legged in front of a former president, Degeneres backed up Robbie's original point that the shorts were way too short.

This selling point appears to be backed up by the numbers: Concur is currently in use in over 90 countries by thousands of companies, and, according to Newell, the company is currently pushing strongly in Canada (which is why they polled Canadians).

A litany of social research backs up his remarks, Kenney added, pointing to a 1960s study by former U.S. senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan that warned about the consequences of the breakdown of the African - American family.

At that point, there isn't a lot of information out there to back it up, and the idea hasn't been tested as thoroughly as other, farther along concepts.

At one point, she gingerly hikes up the legs of her pants to display the sores on her knees from crawling back and forth on her bedroom floor each day — an exercise meant to help her relearn the use of her limbs.

A lot of science and fellow meditation experts back him up, pointing out several needless hurdles to getting started.

With the NRA and NRA - backed politicians becoming a focal point of the conversation around gun control, people and companies are standing up to say «enough» as they join in the rapidly growing NRA boycott.

«The collaboration we saw was some billing and administrative contacts between the two of them, so you'd see similar people show up in each of the accounts,» said Schroepfer, when asked for more detail about what it had found, before declining to say anything else in a public setting on account of ongoing investigations — despite the committee pointing out other witnesses it has heard from have not held back on that front.

So the process of getting back up to a normal or neutral interest rate could take multiple years, I think is what they are thinking at this point.

Stephen Todd made a significant amount of money in the huge January rally, got out before this February crash, then got back in on Monday February 12th and after a 747 Dow point rally in two days is up nearly 8 % for February too.

To back up that point, Tsipras said a French businessman accompanying French President Emmanuel Macron on his 2 - day visit to Greece this week told him that the once prevalent narrative of Grexit — the likelihood of the deeply - indebted country leaving the 19 - nation eurozone — has now become Grinvestment.

While the points made by these gentlemen are both valid and critically important, they fail to take note of four other dangerous subsidies: (1) the market perception that the Washington and Wall Street revolving door has rendered these firms immune from prosecution — even for repeated, illegal cartel behavior; (2) the ability to spend billions buying back their own stock, effectively propping up their own share price and bad behavior; (3) self - regulation with compromised bodies creating the market perception and reality of a competitive edge; and (4) Congress and the Supreme Court tolerating Wall Street running its own private justice system (mandatory arbitration) where corrupt acts are kept hidden from public view until they blow up into catastrophic events to the economy.

He says that based on the economic data, the fed has set up some parameters for itself and from a data dependent point of view, they have everything they need, but James believes that what will hold back the feds will be market instability.

At this point, the vast majority of people my age — being honest, the dividing line seems to be around 45 years old — roll their eyes and, in a perfectly rational manner, argue that a currency is usually boring and backed up by meaningful institutions such as central banks.

We take some comfort that bond spreads have not moved significantly even as the yield on the 10 - year has backed up three quarters of a point from the 2016 lows (see chart below).

He pointed to the $ 40 billion worth of mortgage - backed securities that the U.S. Fed is buying each month, a policy designed to sop up many of the toxic subprime lending still weighing down the balance sheets of the nation's banks, but that Fisher warned is helping to fuel low mortgage rates.

This can be in the form of travel points, airline miles, or straight up cash back rewards.

In the present environment of ultra-low interest rates which will no doubt head back up at some point, interest rate risk is certainly top of mind.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

Because here's the thing: even with the «head of the wife» bit (what I'm sure we can agree is the most solid verse to back you up) you are missing the point and mistaking the analogy, meant to illustrate only, as the thing itself.

And then the evidence of history pointed toward Jesus having lived, having made these extraordinary claims and then backing that up by returning from the dead.

Whenever a discussion of alcohol comes up among members of my congregation, and someone mentions the story about Jesus turning water into wine for his first public miracle, one point is inevitably made: that the wine back then was watered down so much it had little or no alcoholic content, making it barely more than grape juice.

Also, your point of Bronze Age peoples being intellectually inferior, you really didn't put up anything to back up that claim either.

Whiteheadians seem able to imagine such ecstatically spanned unities - across - time on the so - called «microscopic» scale of the «specious present,» but give up on the idea as the scope of the temporal disclosure space is widened to the scale of human lifetime and of generations.7 But worse than this from the point of view of Heidegger's temporal problematic, by submitting the ecstatic unities of their «specious presents» to the before / after ordering and metric properties of linear time, at least in terms of their mutually external relations and arrangements, they give back ontologically every advantage they gained from the use of an cc - static - temporal disclosure horizon in the first place, even though it was only the single horizon of presence.

But I am getting way off subject here, and into dangerous waters, so let me back up to the real point of this post.

... switch from using a mac to using a pc and expect the same thing... or go back to religion and get the same shunning from the atheists that you got from whatever church that was that you blindly followed... now you get to be the poster child for atheists the same way a repentant drugged up rock star gets to be the poster child for church... except from the atheists» arrogant point of view, you went from uneducated, ignorant, bigoted, intolerant and stupid to being sophisticated, intellectual, open minded and free thinking... in their opinion you were formerly a stupid a s s...

As to our three discussion points: 2) I think we have basically agreed here that we may have both been guilty of putting things in that may not be able to be backed up.

It is not, as James Hester argues, a digression from the narrative that brings the reader back to the conflict that might have gotten lost in the irenic settlement of 2.9 - 10.33 The conflict is a negative illustration following what has up to this point been a positive illustration of unity in the circumcision free gospel.

Eberstadt points out that the conventions of modern libertinism lead to a whole host of social and personal disorders, and she has plenty of evidence to back her claim up, but she provides no account of what would truly satisfy.

As a compromise, they switch channels back and forth during the commercials, and, if Mom and Dad give up, may very possibly stay with the new music - TV channel which entrances both Junior and Sis, who at this point may be doing part of their homework at the same time.

Jared has clarified his critique of evangelicals, which seems to be a sociological critique that, regardless of what we say at the end of the day, our orientation reveals that the political has in fact become an idol.I think it's worth bringing up at this point Joe's post from way back....

Any casual glance back at hisory, right up to the present day will confirm that point of view for any who have intellectual honesty.

So it is that the last of the points made some pages back, summing up the several elements of eucharistic action, comes to the fore.

His strategy, which he refers to as a «recurrence» to this phase of philosophic thought, is to back up to the point where he is sitting there cheek to jowl with Descartes, and then to start all over again, this time avoiding the hopeless dualism which has kept Descartes, and the whole tradition which constitutes the phase of thought in question, from completing the Copernican Revolution.

They all seem to agree and would have no problem / issue with the extra attention to the turban with respect to security issues but none of them can agree with it because there is no rationale to back up why the turban is being pointed out yet no other article of clothing is.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

At one point, he organized a rally of 10,000 to fire up Christians to take back the nation.

I'm not sure if your pointing fun at people who do this kind of ministry, but I just want to back them up and say that I have seen a countless number of healings happen in such a way.

Sharing the gospel of Christ according to the Scriptures backed up by a life of holiness is the best way to point others to Christ.