To
back up his argument for cutting his way out of the recession, Mr Osborne looked to the left as well as right of the political spectrum quoting Roy Jenkins and James Callaghan.
** Looking for more specific information (with references) to
back up the arguments for keeping the cap on charters?
Not exact matches
It's a cogent
argument,
backed up by the fact that 57 per cent of people in B.C. voted
for the NDP and the Greens.
So the theologian has to
back up and make an
argument for the authority of Scripture.
For argument sake the almighty takes the witness stand and
backs up Mitchell.
Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my
argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look
back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live
for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines
for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord
for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
We need to invent a new word
for people willing to believe the writings of unknown authors, of unknown origin, of an unknown but ancient time, which is badly worded, internally AND externally (with modern science) inconsistent, full of statements with no actual
arguments to
back them
up, with the only decently educated people to
back it all
up are theologians who twist the meaning of words and commit logical fallacies and still only try to prove that SOMETHING must exist, not that christianity is the truth.
Vincent and McEachran have split
up previously, following a series of
arguments, but decided to get
back together and we can't rule out the same thing happening again with both parties claiming they still have feelings
for each other.
Well, not at the very beginning of the season any way; I have trouble imagining him taking to the field along side Vermaelen at Anfield and I am not persuaded by the
argument that we wouldn't have paid ten million pounds just
for back up.
She makes the common sense
argument that failing to pay
for more healthful meals
up front will only result in higher health care costs on the
back end, and she considers a variety of ways to pay
for universal lunch, such as a tax on soda or soda advertising, an increase in the capital gains tax, or by reducing income guarantees and price supports to producers of corn and soy.
Check
back on Monday, January 30th
for Part Two of «A Wellness Wake -
up Call,»
for strategies and solutions to implementing new wellness policies, and to learn how the Wellness Impact Report can help you make data - driven
arguments to win over reluctant stakeholders.
Trump quoted a lawyer from O.J. Simpson's legal team to
back up his
argument that special counsel Robert Mueller should never have been appointed because there was no «probable cause»
for collusion or obstruction of justice.
Thanks
for the feedback Garet, nice to see someone using legitimate logic to
back up their
argument!
I'd say that a Guinness might have pepped you
back up after the
argument with your friend, but as you don't like beer... another round
for me and Kyle it is!
Actor Russell Crowe stirred
up controversy earlier this year (15) when he dismissed the ageism
argument, stating, «There are roles
for people in all different stages of life», prompting self - confessed feminist Jessica Chastain to fire
back, «I think he's getting his foot stuck in his mouth.»
The economic research
argument for universal preschool is
backed up by some practical considerations.
While the KT520's image and video results aren't earth shattering, they do the job and are
backed up by an auto focus function — although the flash must have had an
argument with LG too as it's left the building
for this handset as well.
You don't have to agree with me, but saying that I'm wrong because I'm not in the publishing industry, without
backing it
up, doesn't make
for a very compelling
argument.
She
backs up her
arguments with clear examples, and she provides lots of resources
for writers.
Hmm, I wonder if the «Pet health industry» includes in your definition, the «breeding industry,» because your
arguments ring almost word
for word of the trolls the breeding industry sends in to throw out wild claims about spay / neuter without the documented research to
back it
up.
- takes place at a prestigious academy located on an isolated island - protagonist is Tenma Wakakoma, who doesn't get along well with his Medabot partner - after a heated
argument, he walks
back home depressed and ends
up meeting the Roborobo Team by accident - he decides to follow them and ends
up in a fight involving the group and a mysterious Medabot - Tenma manages to fend off the evil group, but he doesn't know is that an old man witnessed the whole thing - several days later, he receives a mysterious letter that tells him he has been selected to enter the prestigious academy - he even received a scholarship
for it - Tenma accepts and enrolls in the academy - the academy is a place where the richest and most influential Medabot battlers train - the academy is located on a large, exhausted Medalia mine - rumors say there's still a large, undiscovered Medalia vain underground - total of 290 Medabots - revamped battle system allowing
for swapping of Medabots parts during battle
My sniff test
for this
argument causes my head to jerk
back and my nose to scrunch
up.
Thanks
for the graph showing that ozone has not lowered since around 1988,
backing up my
argument, that it cant be the cause of south pole cooling.
Chief sometimes sets the benchmark
for arrogance and at times can be thin skinned, but as far as I am concerned he carries weight,
backs up his
arguments with data and links and generally is someone deserving of respect.
I presented a list of simple statements
for you to accept or deny because you had failed to make any rational
argument to
back up your sneers.
In any case, there's no denying that you have gathered a very comprehensive collection of explanations, generally
backed by pertinent links,
for most
arguments AGW - sceptics may come
up with.
JEG comes
back with the
argument that he's not screening
for going
up at the end, he's just trying to screen
for what actually correlates to temperature, which happens to have increased in the 20th century.
For the sake of argument lets say I can't pick up and throw any faster than you so for every ball I throw over you throw one back at the same ti
For the sake of
argument lets say I can't pick
up and throw any faster than you so
for every ball I throw over you throw one back at the same ti
for every ball I throw over you throw one
back at the same time.
But does nt this
argument also apply to replacing coal fired power with nuclear and NG
back -
up for extreme peak demand?
Well, it looks like the press release was carefully worded, and referring
back to Anthony Watts article on his blog which is criticized at the beginning of the RC article, i see no wrong claim there... Hiss main
argument is written in bold: «The IPCC is under scrutiny
for various data inaccuracies, including its claim — based on a flawed World Wildlife Fund study — that
up to 40 % of the Amazonian forests could react drastically and be replaced by savannas from even a slight reduction in rainfall.»
What he intended as a learned
argument for rolling
back «big government» ends
up sounding like just another Tea Party diatribe.
It's the same
argument I used
for JD Supra on the web: don't just tell me you're an expert,
back it
up.
For example in Ishaq v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 FC 156, (a case about whether a woman could wear her niqab during a citizenship ceremony), six public interest groups — including the Ontario Human Rights Commission, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and the National Council of Canadian Muslims — were refused permission to intervene, as the court determined that they could not advance their proposed
arguments without social science evidence to
back them
up; nor could the court take judicial notice (facts and materials are accepted on a common sense basis without being formally admitted in evidence) of any of the facts necessary to support the
arguments.
If that is the best
argument you can come
up with
for people to invest their hard - earned money, you might want to go
back to selling timeshares in rented hotel ballrooms.
we get into a lot of
arguments and yes after the cheating incident i have asked
for a divorce but i didn't mean it i was very upset we have gotten in multiple physical fights and we have made
up from them but recently we have gotten in a really bad one to the point where my husband has told me that he no longer wants to be with me and wants to divorce me i need advice on what i should do like he still tells me he loves me and is nice and loving toward me every so often but then he goes
back to the whole he doesn't want me and tells me not to touch him but then a few hours later or a day later he wants to be close again.
It's an odd way
for lawyers — artists of logic — to preface neutral advice
backed up with reasoned
argument.