Sentences with phrase «back up the statements of»

Just be sure to complete your own research to back up the statements of others.

The list of personal references attached to my resume should serve as a means to back up the statements of my success.

Not exact matches

That quick clarification of the true liability, backed by an additional statement from the White House, sent the stock back up within hours.

Be sure to back up your statements and explain how your new way of doing things will benefit them, solve a problem or, if it is a work situation, improve productivity.

«The NY Fed should go back to the drawing board and draw from the deep, diverse, and highly qualified list of candidates provided to it by the Fed Up coalition (as well as surveying the views of other public interest groups),» the Economic Policy Institute's Josh Bivens said in a recent statement.

The Metropolitan Police said in a statement that it relies on the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE), a 1984 piece of legislation, to back up its use of such devices.

Trump makes statements, whether it's about the size of his inaugural crowd or Obama wiretapped him or what have you, that just don't get backed up.

This book shows you that EVERY BUSINESS can adapt principles that help the world... This book uses trustworthy sources to back up statements and rather than just providing good ideas and examples of their implementation, it arms you with call to actions.

John, the problem with every single one of your statements is that you have absolutely nothing to back up your claims.

Of course God isn't interested in my opinion or in yours, since this subject isn't even in the bible and you have to prove God exist as well to back that statement up.

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

You didn't actually provide any proof to back up your statements as to where the whole concept of hell such as showing the Greek conecpts actually derived their belief from the Egyptians or showing how they were all derived from Persia as opposed to there could not be any chance whatsoever that there was any independant invention.

This non-sense of claiming that the Hebrew calendar is irrelevant to science and the «theory» of evolution is just another pig - rear false statement with no quantifiable evidence to back that up.

@Nonimus Naomi Klein's bias is betrayed by her loaded language, but she generally cites good references to back up her statements (even if a lot of them are deliberately contentious).

This is combined with an alarming tendency to make sweeping statements such as; «New Testament scholars sometimes say that the Gospel accounts of the appearances of the risen Christ are false and his followers did not intentionally claim to be eye - witnesses to his resurrection», without references to back it up.

So when I assert that I believe in God, I am willing to back up this statement with some kind of justification, reasons, or even empirical evidence.

I would like to see you back up this statement with at least one passage of scripture.

It is also frustrating to see you repeatedly post the same things without back up or citing sources, and after others (myself included) have attempted to engage you in dialog regarding the accuracy of your statements and you ignore those conversations in favor of posting the same things over again.

We need to invent a new word for people willing to believe the writings of unknown authors, of unknown origin, of an unknown but ancient time, which is badly worded, internally AND externally (with modern science) inconsistent, full of statements with no actual arguments to back them up, with the only decently educated people to back it all up are theologians who twist the meaning of words and commit logical fallacies and still only try to prove that SOMETHING must exist, not that christianity is the truth.

You don't have a single shred of evidence to back up that statement.

So opening up the blog posting all over again I went back and read everything you wrote about your experience with this cake and I noticed the statement your husband made about this being one of your best five cakes you've ever made.

These were the words uttered by Danny Duffy, who later backed up that statement by committing to a five - year, $ 65 million deal with the Royals before the 2017 season, buying out several years of free agency.

Our player of the season so far?Certainly the most consistent.JACK AND OZIL CONTRACTS - just get them signed up for F *** S SAKE.Jack doesn't want to go anywhere and Ozil will have his choice of big clubs to choose from if allowed to be able to go on a free.How about giving out a statement of our ambitions (yeah right) and show were prepared to pay whatever it takes (up to the point of being ridiculous) to SIGN the best and KEEP the best» These two are the best we have so get them sorted early to send out a message of how serious we intend to be.AUBAMEYANG - So what if he has a contract.So did Sanchez.Offer the right money to Dortmund and the player and he will be ours.What is there to question over this deal?He is a proven goalscorer.We have just lost one.Get the deal done.GIROUD - Get rid of him to Dortmund if they want him either by selling or if it sweetens the deal just loan him till the end of the season.He was a back up when Sanchez was here and will be on the mix of back ups if Auba signs.He has a World Cup squad to fight for just to be considered so needs to be playing every week.We do not need him if Auba signs and would demand better than him if the deal fails to happen.Just get rid.JONNY EVANS - I'm not sure.Agree Kos needs nursing through games and we do not have consistent performers to come in if he is injured or rested mainly due to both Chambers and Holdimg not progressing through as much as we first thought and hoped for.Gooners have always been patient and supportive of the youngsters as they have come through but question marks to the whole coaching staff as to why these two seem to have stalled as much as they have done.Steve Bould - What do you do?You should be ashamed.

His subsequent statement to the press that he «went two yards further back» kicked off a Saturday morning of fevered activity that ended up with the committee investigating Woods» actions and eventually assessing a two - shot penalty but not a DQ.

talk about skewing the stats to fit your own conclusions... this is like a slap in the face to every real Arsenal fan... have you no shame, have you no dignity, have you no sense of right from wrong... if you think everything was so well orchestrated why is everyone and their brother laughing at the way in which we conduct business both on and off the field... either you're a paid hack or a delusional buffoon... regardless you can't be a genuine Arsenal fan because the difficulties facing this club having been going on for years and this latest episode in our pathetic recent history is but a glaring reminder of how far we have fallen... I'm not going to waste my time discrediting every single ridiculous statement you made in your love letter to Wenger, but if you write another article I will gladly expose you for the fraud you truly are... this club is in desperate need of a serious cleansing and for you to try and package this dog and pony show as a well - oiled machine is a direct insult to anyone who has supported this team during the supposed «lean» years... the deceptive and disrespectful manner in which this organization has treated it's fans is an abomination to supporters everywhere and for you to even try to justify their actions is akin to saying just shut - up and keep filling our pockets... so please crawl back under whatever stone you crawled out from under and think carefully before you spew this type of propaganda ever again

Golovkin's got some real mandatories approaching, so I'd much rather see him fuck Canelo off for good now and try and dismantle the up - and - comer class, get back to being the active fighter everyone loved and end his career with that kind of statement.

When he was challenged about his statement by one of the reporters at the Arsenal press conference yesterday, Arsene Wenger chose to back up a little and say that you can never rule out any club from the Premier League title race at this early stage of the season.

Go to uefa.com before making bold statements, I agree we don't have a world class striker like Messi, Ronaldo, lewandowski and ibrahimovic, but also bayern aside none of them have a world class keeper like cech, certainly none of them have a back up as good as ospina.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

I have to admit this is a pretty clever way to attempt to deliver a mind game hammer blow to the opposition and for all I know he followed up this statement by stating that Cesc Fabregas is «weeks away from becoming an Arsenal player» and perhaps a neat back handed compliment where he states that «Robin Van Persie's injuries have made Arsenal's physio departments one of the hardest working in Europe».

For Gruden, it's more of a mission statement propped up by iconography about how he's gonna bring back OLD TIMEY FOOTBALL to a modern game that's lost its way.

On this week's episode of the Mixer Irish football podcast, we look back at a dream week for Bohemians and those controversial Bray Wanderers statements, as well as the usual round - up of the latest League of Ireland action.

Also, if we are saying that only money will win you the league then it is indeed sad and it reminds me of what I said a while back where if FFP is not effective, we may as well dispense with playing the 38 matches in a season and just get the club treasurers of each of the 20 clubs to turn up at the beginning of the season with a copy of the clubs latest bank statement.

How old was your mom, what were her avenues of information back in the day and so on... Now to the second part of the statement «I turned up ok».

You don't cite any studies or research to back up your statements, just your observations, but let's examine a few of your reasons anyway.

Athletes want to get back as soon as possible and the attitude of «invincibility» that teenagers often have can end up garbling the instructions given by the therapist; a statement such as «You can start practicing again next week» can end up as «You can go back to full speed 100 % in the game next week.»

I wrote a an entire page for a response and will post the link here when it is published on their website, but for now I will just share with you a portion of what I wrote in reply...» This statement about breastfeeding is not only incorrect with absolutely no evidenced based research to back it up, but can be harmful t to a mum's breastmilk supply and her baby.

As the lead investigator said in a statement, «Countries that have been holding back on implementing medical circumcision programs due to a lack of evidence regarding risk compensation should have no concerns about scaling - up programs.»

Frequently reassure your son that he always has your support and show him the truth of this statement by backing it up with actions.

They assume, and present their statements, as if they are backed up by systematic studies that prove that parents are not intelligent nor capable enough to take care of the sleep environment within which they «co-sleep» and that during sleep parents all become insensitive to their infants need, and are incapable of responding to their infants needs or conditions when scientific studies published in the best medical scientific journals contradict and refute their claims.

The figures are extremely out of date, and do not back up the statements made.

On top of that, COMIDA seemed to go out of its way to back up Reilich's statements last weekend, visiting the I - Square site.

The release also includes some helpful back - up for King's statements, including reports on Levy's association with Ethan Ellner, whose title company received $ 85,000 worth of county business even though he is an ex-con, and Lazio's Wall Street bonus and efforts to fight consumer protections while he was a lobbyist at JP Morgan.

«While the federal government continues to turn its back on protecting natural resources and plots to open up our coastline to drilling, New York is doubling down on our commitment to renewable energy and the industries of tomorrow,» Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo said in a statement.

«These brave New Yorkers stepped up to help our neighbors at their time of greatest need and after battling dangerous wildfires in California, I'm proud to welcome them back home,» Cuomo said in a statement.

With so few statements backed up by coherent arguments many people in the UK are being exposed to unbalanced accounts of many of the important issues of the day.

During the AV referendum in 2011 David Farrell and colleagues found that just 12 % of statements made in the print media were backed up with coherent arguments.

Those shouts were a scattered but steady stream of supportive statements, drawing waves and the occasional shout back from the candidate as she moved expeditiously up Fifth Avenue.

«South Jersey deserves a conservative champion in Congress — someone who will defend the president's agenda, fight to bring our fair share of tax dollars back to South Jersey, and stand up to Nancy Pelosi and the radical left,» he said in a statement.

It was not, it's fair to say, universally welcomed by Labour supporters and there was particular criticism of it being backed up with a couple of poll questions showing people agreed with a statement «We must live within our means so cutting the deficit is the top priority».