Sentences with phrase «back up their statements with»

Watch out for: The optimist who tells you that everything is going to go viral, or who claims that something's viral but can't back up the statement with numbers.

So when I assert that I believe in God, I am willing to back up this statement with some kind of justification, reasons, or even empirical evidence.

I would like to see you back up this statement with at least one passage of scripture.

So please back up your statement with good reference or research that supports it, else shut up.

Back up your statements with fact not hearsay.

Please feel free to back up that statement with some peer - reviewed citations, it is really disturbing that some parents actually believe this nonsense.

First, you should back up your statements with sources.

Not only does your comment serve as a reminder that fashion is so subjective, but you back up your statements with a fabulous recommendation!

I didn't catch in time to actually check any notes I had aganist the profiles on site, so can't say for certain but it appeared that they had listed some members as basic / featured members but after contact with them and going back to the members user name in my buddies list and sent mail lists on site that evenone in all my lists was now listed as an online cupid So I can't back up my statement with hard facts I know I had coontact with members on first contact were listed as basic or featured.

Students tend to give vague answers, so we must work with them to be specific and back up their statements with evidence.

And they're prepared to back up that statement with a massive editing giveaway all through the month of August.

If you can not back up your statements with references to specific sources, the value of your law dissertation is equal to zero!

That certainly happened with Lomborg, who accused the group of acting as «opinion police» when one of the annotators didn't back up a statement with facts — which then prompted a long response from Vincent in the comments section of Forbes.

It seems to me to be bizarre that modern scientific method (for instance backing up your statements with tests demonstrating that they have statistically significant support from the data — where data is available and the test is easily performed) seems optional for those arguing against the mainstream position.

But I promised to back up that statement with solid reasons, and attempted to do so.

Then you need to back up these statements with evidence about yourself and your achievements.

If you're worried about sounding boastful or blunt, backing up every statement with solid examples will diffuse that.

Back up statements with examples or extra details.

Be clear about the direction you wish to take and back up your statements with concise, clear, consistent facts about yourself.

Highlight your achievements and the value added skills you can bring to the job and back up your statements with examples.

The rest of your document would need to back up that statement with verifiable evidence, of course, but you could do that easily by listing some of your «savvy» in the qualifications section.

Anyone can say, «x causes y» but few people can actually back up those statements with science (or even logic in many cases).

Not exact matches

Back up your ideas or statements with credible evidence.

In a previous statement regarding the same proposal, DiNapoli once noted: «ExxonMobil has said it supports the Paris Agreement, but those are empty words unless the company backs them up with action.»

This book shows you that EVERY BUSINESS can adapt principles that help the world... This book uses trustworthy sources to back up statements and rather than just providing good ideas and examples of their implementation, it arms you with call to actions.

This statement is also never backed up with valid reasons.

But I won't hold my breath ---- cause all you emergents makes statements like the above with only your opinion to back it up.

John, the problem with every single one of your statements is that you have absolutely nothing to back up your claims.

You called me out as being disingenuous when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the argument, and came up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».

I say unless you can back up a law with facts and logical statements then it shouldn't be considered in a democracy.

This non-sense of claiming that the Hebrew calendar is irrelevant to science and the «theory» of evolution is just another pig - rear false statement with no quantifiable evidence to back that up.

if one wanted to be a troll, one would turn that very statement against you: Why make statements about what / who created man or which religion is correct when you can't back them up with proof?

Can you back that statement up with evidence, or are you just going to rely on someone else's reputation to make your point for you?

This is combined with an alarming tendency to make sweeping statements such as; «New Testament scholars sometimes say that the Gospel accounts of the appearances of the risen Christ are false and his followers did not intentionally claim to be eye - witnesses to his resurrection», without references to back it up.

Jibberish i.e. wild statements with nothing to back»em up is for juveniles and the less able.

Now you can continue to rant and whine and come back yet again with more false statements about my views... or you can simply grow up and leave it alone.

If I make a statement about the objective world, which includes everything apart from my subjective world: my thoughts, my feelings, my beliefs, etc., I need to back it up with empirical evidence that can be tested and retested experimentally.

We need to invent a new word for people willing to believe the writings of unknown authors, of unknown origin, of an unknown but ancient time, which is badly worded, internally AND externally (with modern science) inconsistent, full of statements with no actual arguments to back them up, with the only decently educated people to back it all up are theologians who twist the meaning of words and commit logical fallacies and still only try to prove that SOMETHING must exist, not that christianity is the truth.

You believe in theories which are unproven beliefs and try and back them up with the statement «Science provides questions that may never be answered...» LOL talk about a lazy answer.

In all honesty, there is not a single product or recipe out there that you can't recreate at home using whole foods and natural sweeteners that come packaged up with other goodies like vitamins, minerals and fibre (will this statement come back to bite me?!

So opening up the blog posting all over again I went back and read everything you wrote about your experience with this cake and I noticed the statement your husband made about this being one of your best five cakes you've ever made.

You made a statement with nothing to back it up.

These were the words uttered by Danny Duffy, who later backed up that statement by committing to a five - year, $ 65 million deal with the Royals before the 2017 season, buying out several years of free agency.

His subsequent statement to the press that he «went two yards further back» kicked off a Saturday morning of fevered activity that ended up with the committee investigating Woods» actions and eventually assessing a two - shot penalty but not a DQ.

Golovkin's got some real mandatories approaching, so I'd much rather see him fuck Canelo off for good now and try and dismantle the up - and - comer class, get back to being the active fighter everyone loved and end his career with that kind of statement.

Manchester's biggest news publication claim that Smalling was in fact suffering with food poisoning — a diagnosis that is also backed up by a statement on United's official website.

I have written before here about the shocking statement that the board have no clue unless Wenger has an idea and if not they wait for him to come with a plan (which they will back up).

Because it is easy to pull out such statements when there's nothing you can back them up with.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene

Anyone can make a statement but you need to back it up, Even with Sanchez we are not strong enough to win the league or even challenge, We need more top players, At the moment we have spent around 40 mil on transfers, Where is the so called warchest.