And guys - there's something to
back up your argument when people say geeks are no fun!
Not exact matches
I'm sorry but you're not making an
argument to counter his, you have no references or citations to
back up such a claim and so you revert to attacking this man by calling him gay??? really, you think your the world authority on the bible
when then you start casting stones left and right and attacking your fellow man?
You called me out as being disingenuous
when I said «that as time goes on however, I'm finding things that are helping to disprove things previously held as fact among Christians», so I have provided you an example that not only wasn't it a disingenuous statement, but that I've done my homework, on both sides of the
argument, and came
up with something that no one has been able to give me a response with even either the slightest chance of being possible, or falling
back to the old status qua of «mysterious ways» and «having faith».
Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my
argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change
when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then
when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death
when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look
back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz
When adversaries stick it to you from outside the club, always trying to cause a stir within and among us and we have so called fans agreeing with these failed pundits who prolly do nt even have a voice in their own households, we like illegitimate children back up their unsincere arguments, hell Piers Morgan does it from a place of genuine concern, the AKBs and AOBs too, Fatboy gooner and NY gunner on here even and we are happy to have them but when we thoughtlessly indulge and endorse those who would rather see us fail by always coming up with.unsolicited advise especially without any reasonable bases, we are as much enemies of the club we claim to love, cutting of our nose to spite our face... shame ag
When adversaries stick it to you from outside the club, always trying to cause a stir within and among us and we have so called fans agreeing with these failed pundits who prolly do nt even have a voice in their own households, we like illegitimate children
back up their unsincere
arguments, hell Piers Morgan does it from a place of genuine concern, the AKBs and AOBs too, Fatboy gooner and NY gunner on here even and we are happy to have them but
when we thoughtlessly indulge and endorse those who would rather see us fail by always coming up with.unsolicited advise especially without any reasonable bases, we are as much enemies of the club we claim to love, cutting of our nose to spite our face... shame ag
when we thoughtlessly indulge and endorse those who would rather see us fail by always coming
up with.unsolicited advise especially without any reasonable bases, we are as much enemies of the club we claim to love, cutting of our nose to spite our face... shame again.
Unfortunately there are no stats to
back up this
argument but all one has to see is how comfortable this man is
when he is on the ball; he's like Marvin Gaye — smooth.
I think people pull that
argument out
when they literally have no other basis to
back their side
up.
,» In the piece, Dana comes out essentially right where I did, suggesting that we modify flavored milk rather than eliminating it entirely, and she
backs up her
arguments with many more facts and figures than I had at hand
when I wrote my own post.
When in 1999 I wrote and warned him that his approach was disintegrative, his Chief - of - Staff, Jonathan Powell, called
back, summed
up my
argument saying «After us the deluge» and asked me to meet then Lord Chancellor Derry Irvine, who agreed the «The genie is out the bottle».
Redwood's
argument is that the UK is bound into the EU's trade policy by its membership of the customs union and that the EU's trade policy is to have no agreements with other countries at all — thereby leaving both us and them on
back -
up WTO trade terms
when it comes to the rest of the world.
Well, I don't think we should start messing around fixing it in the sense of sending them miles
up into the space; [in] fact I make some
arguments why that's not going to happen, because we can't even agree on CO2 now, the world's nations are not going to agree upon how much to try to turn the thermostat
back, particularly
when the crops might be growing better with higher CO2, right now
when the temperature effects haven't kicked in fully.
Actor Russell Crowe stirred
up controversy earlier this year (15)
when he dismissed the ageism
argument, stating, «There are roles for people in all different stages of life», prompting self - confessed feminist Jessica Chastain to fire
back, «I think he's getting his foot stuck in his mouth.»
When the NAACP tries to
back up what they refer to as «research» [emphasis not mine] as to why they have a moratorium, they find themselves reaching and breaking with logic very quickly into the
argument.
Its a completely different
argument when interest rates go
back up above 6 %.
I do nt believe facts and figures are «incoherent», I believe that
when we are talking about the catastrophic destabalization of our global climate, it is neccesary to
back up my
argument with fact, and to educate you.
When you look at it closely, the thought that the effort to screen could lack value is an
argument without the facts to
back it
up.