Sentences with phrase «back views because»

Not exact matches

Even companies that garner lots of eyeballs on the world's biggest video site — and Machinima says it generates billions of views a month — have had a hard time turning that into a profitable business, because ad rates are low and much of the money they do make goes back to YouTube.

In August 2007, 22 members of the House of Representatives asked George Bush to back away from the SPP because of their concerns that it may undermine U.S. sovereignty and their strong objections about important discussions continuing «out of public view and without congressional oversight or approval» or the «proper transparency and accountability.»

Last week in London, for example, an analyst from a research company with whose views I am usually in strong sympathy and who herself is very bearish on China's growth prospects, airily dismissed Chinese debt concerns by pointing out that Chinese government debt, even after adding back estimates of losses in the banking system, is lower than that of the Japanese government, and because the government's debt burden has not been a problem in Japan it won't be a problem in China.

«What's going to happen is that youth unemployment is, in my view, going to become worse because there will be pressure on franchisees to cut back.»

Treasury bonds (T - Bonds) are issued by the U.S. Treasury and are viewed as the safest investments in the world because they're backed by the U.S. government.

In my view, this will be the «hook» that ultimately yanks the hope of long - term financial security from countless investors who were pulverized by the 2000 - 2002 and 2007 - 2009 declines — and believe that now is somehow the right time to get back in because Alan Greenspan said so on CNBC.

It is the internet and posting this link or that link is almost pointless because someone can always Google and post a link that backs up their views.

So I doubt many will take her views seriously, since the fly in the face of what we have learned through the years about such Christians martyrs as Jim Elliot (speared to death by the Aucas and yet his son went back to be a missionary to them, because he LOVED them, something she might want to consider).

Sorry to disagree with you but I have no problem with putting muslim «tradition» on the back burner and if you don't like it that's tough, heck, we didn't leave a single intact church steeple in Europe in WWII because they were used by enemy artillery spotters and snipers, why should muslims get a pass, Tradition did not stop muslims from dragging dead US soldiers through Mogadishu nor did it stop them from hanging contractors from under bridges, Osama's body should have been brought back and put on display is a glass box at all three of his sites, allowing those who wanted to view him ample time to do so.

You an be against the US gov» t helping them get released but not allowing them back in because they expresse their views won't help anyone.

Not hate and turning your back on someone just because they hold different points of view.

The things I find most appalling about religion reach a new zenith in Islam --(i) a dulling down of individual thought and a dogmatic requirement to conform to the views of the masses; (ii) a stultifying ignorant education system in which anything inconsistent with the Qur» an is not just discouraged, but censored; (iii) the subjugation of women to the point of educating them to be nothing but mindless f * king, breeding machines for their insecure husbands; (iv) a political class that feeds off the religious - based ignorance it imposes on its populations; and (v) a general back - sliding against the rest of the planet because heads are buried in Dark Ages mythology.

Speaking at the San Antonio Conference, Lesslie Newbigin made reference to his own cultural background in these terms: «As I look back on my own life as a missionary in India, I realize now in a way that I never did at that time that I was not only carrying the gospel but that I was also a carrier of this so - called modern world - view which I now see to be breaking down because it is false.

First he attempted to apply a logical argument, whose history extends back at least as far as Cicero's On Divination.4 According to this view, contingency (chance) and foreknowledge (fate) are contradictory assertions because a contingent event, being unnecessitated, can not be known until it occurs.

The evangelistic tactics that would call them back to the world view of yesterday, a world view they abandoned ages ago because it no longer made contact with their lives, are doomed to failure.

Cawthon says it all traces back to Chaucer, who was buried at the church in 1400 because he had worked at Westminster Palace --- not because he was necessarily viewed as a great literary figure at the time.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

The invitation was heavily criticized by progressives because of Warren's views on same - sex marriage, but in a new Washington Post-ABC News poll, 61 percent said they back Obama's invitation.

Luther's distinction between law and gospel seems to express this view, as does the vision of the twentieth «century Polish mystic St. Faustina Kowalska, which portrays a wrathful God the Father holding back from the application of terrible justice only because He sees man through the wounds of His Son.

Yes, some may take inspiration to mean only the elite should be able to interpret it, but just because somebody uses inspiration to back up their unfortunate views, that does not make inspiration itself incorrect.

DE: Whitehead called his view a radical empiricism because it claimed to be more radical than sense - data empiricism, as going back to a more primitive kind of experience.

They are knowingly attempting to inject their religious world view on everyone and anyone because they believe they know how best to live and don't give a rat's ass about anyone elses freedoms or rights, but if you want to call that «doing their best» then you can take your message back to it's authors, the vile disgusting things, the wh.o.re of Babylon, the putrid decaying evil of Joseph Smith and shove it down his dead and crumbling corpse.

Catholics have not used the language of primordiurn much because they see biblical history within the tradition and the tradition within history, but the conservatives are often primitive in their views about origins of episcopacy and papacy, and contemporary moderates often try to settle things by going back to biblical accounts of early ministry and communal life.

He's just viewed as «back to his best» because he scored.

The guy is not a RWB nor is he a CM.Just by looking at how he plays you can tell he was made to be a winger.A wingback can be viewed as a defensive winger.He does well there because he's able to play like a winger.However, if you ask me he's terrible defensively.But I like the fact that he tracks back when he plays as a winger.At CM, he's able to do very welll because his passing and crossing is excellent.However, over there he's forced to restrict his runs and risk taking a bit because he's playing at the center.As winger he has full freedom to expres himself.Here, he can use his running, crossing, risk taking and dribbling to great effect All he needs is to develop that certain level of cobsistency.He can really come good because he's shown he can.

We have ALL lambasted Robin Van Persie over the years for leaving Arsenal but looking back at it now it makes him seem like Nostradamus because he clearly stated that his views on the way Arsenal needed to move forward was markedly in contrast to what Gazidis and Wenger were thinking.

The team desperately needs Ahmad Bradshaw to return, because despite the success of rookie David Wilson, as evidenced by his 12 carries Sunday, Coughlin doesn't view him as an every - down sort of back.

Our 3 back is just so wrong.We don't have natural wingbacks even in this formation.It also seems to me that lots of people here believe if you're good at right or left fullback then automatically you're good at RWB / LWB which quite frankly is untrue.That's why Oxlade Chamberlain can be considered at RWB but not right back.At RWB or LWB you're asking too much in terms of attack from Bellerin and Kolasinac.A proper wing back can be viewed as a more defensive winger which quite frankly none of them are and they don't possess the flexibility too to play that way.Our midfielders are also not disciplined enough because in 3 back there's a huge gap in the centre of the field that must be covered by our CM's so indiscipline only means disaster.We also have Ozil who looks like he's playing at RW in 3 back.In that we're limiting his impact because Ozil takes on his man because he wants to not because he likes to.You can't play such players at the wing.He's a proper No. 10 who likes to be given freedom.That's why Ozil plays likes he's lazy on the ball and stuff.It's because he wants to be free and for that you need to put him at No. 10.

«From my point of view, it is very promising because we were short at the back, especially in the centre position.

As for Fournette and your view of our running backs let's just move on because you're trying to say that Ivory, Yeldon and Grant were a productive stable of running backs.

All of our posts include an opinion so it's important that you comment your opinion back because football is all about fans having their views.

If selling Van Persie and Arshavin are required to raise the funds then so be it because in my view, our needs at the back are greater than our needs at the front.

Not sure anyone will be wanting to sign him next year for other than a few million, He has had one good game so far this season and seeing we have had a great start that does not sit well, Last week playing Tomks and Reid in the middle was not good and so far Tomks has played better at right back because he concentrated more and don't give me that not so good attacking view we don't need that with the midfield and forwards we have and I would prefer Kouyate going forward and not having to worry about covering Jenks back, Time for Oxford to have a game along side Reid I think or Ginge, Maybe Jenks and Noble need to watch from the bench for a week and get a reality check, No I ain't saying get rid just a slap on the wrist to wake them up

Klopp has spoken already about different tactics and will be looking to be able to tweak options to make us more unpredictable — in this sense then Origi and Sturridge should not be viewed as back - ups because that presupposes they are not going to play unless we want to rest Firmino when all that we have heard so far is that Klopp wants different options — I'm not sure that at home against lowly opposition that Firmino's subtleties are the best way to break down the door — equally a conventional striker against an elite team may not be the best ploy

This is not me at an official wellness class but I'm including it because OMG that view and OMG my back finally felt good enough to do this pose.

Because regardless of what happens with SNA's desired one - year waiver language in the pending 2015 appropriations bill, the 2015 Child Nutrition Reauthorization (CNR) is looming large and the SNA clearly views the CNR as its best chance to permanently roll back key HHFKA nutrition standards relating to sodium, whole grains, fruits and vegetables and a la carte offerings.

Because sitting there hurt him too much emotionally, he often tried to get up and reconnect, which I viewed as defiance and put him back in the chair.

I love doing giveaways because it gives me an opportunity to give back to all of you, and to... View Post

His body tucks alongside your side, with his feet towards the back of the chair, or whatever you're sitting on.3 This is another helpful early nursing position because it supports your baby well, while giving you plenty of control and a good view of his face.

From a wrap back carry, baby has a great view of the world and benefits from enhanced language development because baby can easily hear you talking and see what you're talking about.

I'm adding brave to this too because of an incident some years back, when Baby Friendly was something us «breastfeeding people» hoped for one day but was viewed as non-priority by many hospitals.

It makes so much sense because it kind of just goes back to what we were saying earlier about how it's probably in all of us that we have an idealistic view of the family experience and like gosh, I don't know if I really want to talk about it like it being hard or things happening to my moods

Send this back if u do...» I must stress that I normally view texts and emails like these with contempt, but for some reason - perhaps because it was recess - I decided to forward it on to my girlfriend.

Pakistan is strictly backed by U.S. India have close ties with U.S. because, from U.S. point of view, it is some sort of counter-weight against China.

POLITICO's Glenn Thrush suggested not long ago that D'Amato's backing of Blakeman «only further proves» the ex-senator is trying to help Gillibrand because Blakeman isn't viewed as a strong challenger, even though he has amassed the most GOP support of her three would - be challengers to date.

His responses are not always as polished as some of the others, but that's because they are his views and not the creation of some back - room spin doctor.

A major critic of the project has been the New Patriotic Party's flagbearer, Nana Akufo - Addo, who challenged the president to go back to the drawing board to reassess the current cost of the Interchange project because, in his view, it was overpriced.

If you're saying to people «your views aren't legitimate because of who you are» I think it's a self - limitation — it's like sending Mo Farah onto the track with a 40 lb weight on his back.

In all logic refugees are less likely to travel back to their country (because they'd be persecuted if they'd do so) so there's no reason to be against them migrating, in an ecological point of view.

For the first time since the Sex Offender Registry Act took effect in January 1996, some individuals often viewed as untouchables are getting back some of their privacy because they're aging off the list.