Sentences with phrase «backed by physics»

Until now, this has been a reasonable proposition and suspicion, albeit backed by Physics.

Is the entire body of climatology backed by physics established since the 19th century not good enough evidence for you?

Yet CO2 forcing is clear and backed by physics.

Not exact matches

So in one sense it all seems to be over; as though, having reached its final point of Noospheric Reflexion, the cosmic impulse towards consciousness has become exhausted, condemned to sink back into the state of disintegration implacably imposed on it by the laws of stellar physics.

So, the researchers — headed by Professor of Physics and Biological Sciences Shane Hutson and Associate Professor of Cell and Developmental Biology Andrea Page - McCaw — targeted cells on the back of fruit fly pupae that expressed a protein that fluoresces in the presence of calcium ions.

We are realising as a community that ideas from theoretical computer science can give us deep insights into physics, backed up by rigorous mathematical proofs.

She traces those anomalies back to a fraction of a fraction of a second after the Big Bang, when our universe was so small that it behaved like a subatomic particle, dominated by quantum physics.

«This was made possible by my unusual position of working on the symmetries of viruses whilst having a mathematical physics background and is thus a unique inspiration of mathematical biology back into mathematical physics.»

So you can get this roughly eightfold leverage (three - to fourfold in the case of a hybrid) from the wheels back to the fuel tank by starting with the physics of the car, making it lighter and with lower drag.

Gunnar Ingelman: So this brings me to the 4th of July, 2012, which is a day that marks a new era in particle physics and this is not only because Francois Englert and Peter Higgs met for the first time ever in front of the packed auditorium at CERN but mainly because their ideas on mass of the fundamental particles had just been confirmed but let us start by going 50 years back in time.

Lead researcher Dr David Clements, from the Department of Physics at Imperial College London, explains: «Although we're able to see individual galaxies that go further back in time, up to now, the most distant clusters found by astronomers date back to when the universe was 4.5 billion years old.

An early sign of helium's odd behavior was observed back in 1911 by the Dutch physicist and 1913 Nobel physics laureate Heike Kamerlingh Onnes, a master of refrigeration who was the first to liquefy helium.

Fourteen months after scoring one of the biggest discoveries ever in physics, experimenters are back in the hunt for gravitational waves — ripples in spacetime set off by some of the cosmos's most violent events.

«This means if we look back to the universe when it was less than a quarter of its present age, we'd see that a pair of galaxies separated by a million light years would be drifting apart at a velocity of 68 kilometers a second as the universe expands,» says Font - Ribera, a postdoctoral fellow in Berkeley Lab's Physics Division.

By studying how the molecule springs back, we can test basic theories of polymer physics far from the equilibrium state.

But she hasn't turned her back on physics and in fact spends a fair share of her time working side by side with physicists in CERN.

«The idea of a cyclic universe has been around for a long time,» says Andreas Albrecht of the University of California at Davis, a co-inventor of inflation, «and it has always been plagued by a fundamental problem: what physics causes the collapsing universe to bounce back into the expanding phase?»

At first the field resembles the one produced by that staple of freshman physics, the current loop: the field lines run up through the center of the doughnut and then circle back on themselves, like the field lines of a bar magnet.

The journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics chose two papers, a perspective paper on the theory of hydrotropes pioneered by the Shimizu Group, as well as simulation work led by a team in Stuttgart which confirmed the theoretical calculations of Joshua Reid (PhD, 2018), originally made back in 2015 (PCCP 17, 14710, 2015).

Because she was trained and nurtured in high energy density physics (HED) at the Lab, she plans to give back «by contributing to our new HED Center, training young scientists and working on some new ideas.»

When the lower back gets out of whack, our necks can be at risk too by the laws of physics and overcompensation in the spine.

A quantum physics professor is forced to take action after being drugged by the leader of jewish cult who wants him to come back home and become the man he once was.

What's more Stephen's interest lies wholly within his world of mathematics and theoretical physics while Jane is involved with medieval Spanish and French and links to Stephen's interest in time by stating that she has often wanted to travel back a few centuries.

The Wolverine table stands out as a true classic for me and the gameplay here is backed by a great physics engine to keep it feeling real.

This is more apparent when talking about the difficulty of the game too, as it's not just a straight up arcade game where you can rely on riding guard rails to get round corners, as FlatOut 4 does incorporate some realistic physics, this combined with the extremely aggressive AI will lead to a lot of restarts as quite often you'll be rounding a corner with the chequered flag in sight, only to be spun out by one of the AI, or hitting an imperfection in the road sending your car into a snake only for the back end to come around on you.

Designed by Tomorrow Corporation's Kyle Gabler, World of Goo is the oldest of the three Tomorrow Corporation titles released on Switch this week, but it's quite possibly the best one out of the three, due to the intelligence behind the game and the ground - breaking physics that impressed us all back in 2008.

This game has a long story: the original game was released back in 2004 on PC by Spain - based Felix Casablancas and Nurium Games, and was the best breakout - style game at its time featuring something very unique for the genre — fully interactive physics.

The standard physics feel more arcade oriented with a much lower chance of crashing when you have become accustomed to the handling, while the semi-pro physics strikes a balance between standard and pro physics as the pro physics are far more realistic and fully depend upon you perfecting the weight distribution of your rider and precision braking throughout every corner of the track, although the rewind mechanic can reduce the difficulty by being able to rewind back to before a crash occurred.

It's rough around the edges and the production qualities are pretty low, but sitting right in the centre of it is a beautiful handling model backed up by solid physics, creating a racer that feels truly great to play.

There is a cool slow - motion mechanic at work that lets you catch a breath as you still move at the same speed but when enemies are hit, in or out of slow - mo, their ragdoll physics take over and many just go sailing back as if they were hit by a semi truck.

Kachina is a whimsical physics toy that explores negative space by allowing players to manipulate a hole in the ground, swallowing up animals and spitting them back out elsewhere.

Likewise, Milestone's WRC 4 was another solid entry improving on WRC 3 with improved graphics, physics and authenticity, but its release towards the end of the current - gen console era meant it too was held back by hardware limitations.

The on - ice physics here, promoted as «True Performance Skating» by the developers, are stunning with a new level of detail in the way momentum can take you toward the goal, along the boards, or into the back of your opponent.

I initially saw your work back in 2012 at the Fabricators exhibition that sculptor James Capper curated at the Hannah Barry Gallery in London and was blown away by your infatuation with physics, engineering and new technologies.

Basic physics, verified by experiment going back to Professor John Tyndall, and satellite observations by NASA.

We do know that there are trends in temperature extremes and precipitation extremes (which are backed solidly by physics in a warming climate), but for the other metrics we don't really see trends at all.

If I extend the physics regarding an earlier post by the kind folks here regrading the skin effect of the temperature inversion layer on the calm sea as preventing the transfere of the heat content of the top of the ocean back into space; If I add in the NOAA 0 Deg.

There is no significant CO2 - AGW — it takes a really bad scientific education to believe in «back radiation», but that is the case for the Atmospheric Sciences whose well was poisoned by Sagan's basic physics» mistakes.......

You responded by admitting that you didn't understand the maths and physics involved, but you refused to back down from your original claim.

As fast as you warm the top, gravity has to move the heat to the bottom to restore the lapse rate, which means that it keeps flowing through the silver to the top, where it flows back to the bottom, where it flows to the top — perpetual motion — of naked heat, absolutely predicted by high school physics.

D Cotton June 15, 2013 at 6:38 am The whole of the pseudo physics of greenhouse effects and assumed heating of the surface by back radiation (or «radiative forcing») is trying to utilise the Stefan - Boltzmann equation which only relates to bodies in a vacuum losing all their energy by radiation without any conduction or evaporative cooling.

All the calculations are backed up by published scientific papers and have been peer reviewed by Dr Thomas Stocker, professor of climate and environmental physics at Bern University in Switzerland, in an attempt to prevent the fossil fuel lobby attacking the findings.

I was baffled — why would little versions of me (for I was a physics undergraduate over two decades ago) not accept manmade climate change when it was backed by overwhelming evidence and endorsed by the vast majority of climate experts, Nobel Laureates and even David Attenborough?

They make up the difference by assuming 333 W / m ^ 2 LW RF measured by «pyrgeometers» pointing to the atmosphere («back radiation») provides extra surface heat when standard physics shows for a normal temperature gradient, an atmospheric RF can't transfer any energy to the surface.

It all goes back to Sagan who was misled by mistaken aerosol optical physics.

The good news is (at least from the perspective of science) that the role of carbon dioxide in climate change is very well established — at the theoretical level in terms of quantum physics, at the experimental level in terms of the study of the absorbtion and re-emission of radiation by carbon dioxide, at the numerical level (when equations get a little too complicated — but a good approximation can result from intensive computation by means of our fairly advanced computers), in terms of historical trends going back more than 500,000 years — and countless studies.

Secured smooth operations of Department's Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory by maintaining Pyrotronics systems and emergency back - up systems.