The reason is simple statistics: It's extremely unlikely to encounter two
background eclipsing binaries (or one background binary and one genuine planet) at the same location.
Not exact matches
Next they ruled out a false positive, usually caused by an
eclipsing binary - star system in the
background, with two relatively small telescopes on the ground, which offer better spatial resolution than COROT does.
An
eclipse within the
background binary would mimic a small brightness dip in Kepler - 20.
But other observations need to confirm the true planetary nature of these candidate events, because the observed dips may also be due to an
eclipsing binary star in the
background whose light blends with the foreground star studied by Kepler.
This goal requires knowledge of the incidence of false positives such as
eclipsing binaries in the
background of the targets, or physically bound to them, which can mimic the photometric signal of a transiting planet.
A blend may consist of a
background or foreground
eclipsing binary (or star - planet pair) whose
eclipses are attenuated by the light of the candidate and possibly other stars within the photometric aperture.