Sentences with phrase «background variability in»

Not exact matches

Mr. Carson has suggested in his more discursive and less technical paragraphs that «variability» and «change» are so endemic to all such systems that the very notion of a «background» or secular change in such a system is inherently specious.

Therefore, it would be necessary to gather more data on the range of variability that can be expected under a broader range of genetic backgrounds and in interaction with biotic and abiotic stressors.

These include variability in the duration of breast - feeding, frequency of breast - feeding, use of supplemental formulas, recall of feeding practices, type of allergic disease being studied, and maternal atopic background.

The researchers noted in today's (Mar. 27) issue of Scientific Reports that «Both the models and observations suggest this signal has only recently emerged from the background noise of natural variability.»

Variability with MJO characteristics (e.g., convection and wind anomalies of the correct spatial scale that propagate coherently eastward with realistic phase speeds) is simulated in many contemporary models (e.g., Sperber et al., 2005; Zhang, 2005), but this variability is typically not simulated to occur often enough or with sufficient strength so that the MJO stands out realistically above the broadband background variability (Lin et Variability with MJO characteristics (e.g., convection and wind anomalies of the correct spatial scale that propagate coherently eastward with realistic phase speeds) is simulated in many contemporary models (e.g., Sperber et al., 2005; Zhang, 2005), but this variability is typically not simulated to occur often enough or with sufficient strength so that the MJO stands out realistically above the broadband background variability (Lin et variability is typically not simulated to occur often enough or with sufficient strength so that the MJO stands out realistically above the broadband background variability (Lin et variability (Lin et al., 2006).

Cancer is an extremely complex biological phenomenon showing enormous variability (e.g., age of patient, cell of origin, general health status, genetic background, location in an organ, nutritional status, presence or absence of continued development of neoplasia (i.e., carcinogenesis), presence or absence of enhancers, rate of growth and division, type and dosage of therapy administered, etc.).

But development is a very complex thing, she says, and she and Mancilla - Martinez have demonstrated in their research that there is immense variability among children from lowincome backgrounds, that risk factors can be balanced out by other strengths, and teachers should always be aware that low - income children are not destined to fail academically.

The majority of variability in test scores results from «system - level conditions»; meaning everything affecting a student outside the teacher's control: the child's socio - economic status, parental background, language barriers, medical issues, student mobility, etc..

There's temporal resolution loss as you go back, but I suspect that for a given background climate, there's a lot of «boringness» within it (e.g., how much in - Eocene or in - Snowball variability do we actually expect?

This variability was named the AMO in the same year by Kerr, see Dijkstra et al 2006 on AMO physics for background literature.

In other words, what we are seeing is probably natural variability in this circulation against a warming background ocean state forced by the increased greenhouse effecIn other words, what we are seeing is probably natural variability in this circulation against a warming background ocean state forced by the increased greenhouse effecin this circulation against a warming background ocean state forced by the increased greenhouse effect.

But to the question you really want to know — when did our massive fossil fuel induced CO2 emissions begin to alter the modern temperature record in a noticeable way beyond natural background variability.

Further, all datasets except for surface temperature decay in quality substantially prior to 1980, making it difficult to interpret the natural background variability.

Specifically, smoothing sea - level data (adjusting for natural variability of ENSO) over the past century fits most closely with a 4th degree polynomial model, and there has very likely not been any slowing in the longer - term background rate of sea level rise over the period of the tropospheric «pause».

Raising the costs of 7.5 billion people's food, energy and fuel in order to maybe slow down warming by less than.1 C / decade seems like a very risky thing to do to me, and I want to see 60 to 120 years more data to really tease out the human signal from the background natural variability signal.

There is an instantaneous rate of increase (nominally — see below) in greenhouse gas forcing of 1E - 9 W / m2 — set against a background of immense natural variability.

Or does the background trend in Figure 3 represent the global warming «forced» signal of an ever - increasing sea ice loss, plus natural variability (Bitz)?

«can causes to climate variability be deduced using differences that are «in the background noise» of the «system's» (thermometers + computer models + data selection + other) ability to measure with confidence?»

This evidence of reduced resistance to bleaching in 2004 in corals at Butaritari supports previous short - term manipulative experiments and long - term observational studies which found that higher background temperature variability or previous exposure to heat stress conferred bleaching resistance [15], [33]--[37].

While there may indeed be additional energy in the system as a result of greenhouse gases — it is set against a background of large natural variability driven by internal climate processes.

There is an instantaneous rate of increase (nominally) in greenhouse gas forcing of 1E - 9 W / m2 — set against a background of immense natural variability.

I contend that that there is strong evidence for major changes in climate over the Holocene (not Milankovich) that require explanation and that could represent part of the current or future background variability of our climate.

There are at least 4 hypotheses about the quantitative effects of the suite of factors collectively called «natural variation»: (a) that it has reduced warming below what CO2 would have caused in the absence of background variability; (b) that natural variability has caused 0 % of the warming since 1850; (c) that natural variability has caused 50 % of the warming since 1850; (d) that natural variability has caused 100 % of the warming since 1850.

In the background reference and in the WGII report, it is clear that this projected impact reflects the combined effects of climate change and variabilitIn the background reference and in the WGII report, it is clear that this projected impact reflects the combined effects of climate change and variabilitin the WGII report, it is clear that this projected impact reflects the combined effects of climate change and variability.

Many time in most threads, and several times in this one I have run across comments that suggest that «If we knew the background variability better, we could reduce the noise component of the compound signal that is the climate.»

In each of these experiments, a non-uniform pattern of sea level rise emerges above the background of temporal variability in the latter part of the 21st centurIn each of these experiments, a non-uniform pattern of sea level rise emerges above the background of temporal variability in the latter part of the 21st centurin the latter part of the 21st century.

BACKGROUND: Manufacturing footwear requires intense manual labor and high repetitions with low variability in function that may lead to musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) symptoms and psychological stress.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Variability in patient care settings and the range of patient handling tasks present challenges in developing and evaluating safe patient handling and mobilization (SPHM) programs.

BACKGROUND: Variability in patient care settings and the range of patient handling tasks present challenges in developing and evaluating safe patient handling and mobilization (SPHM) programs.