The 55 % benchmark prevents either the Tories or the Lib Dems from
backing out of the coalition and bringing government crashing down, because neither party can secure that level of support in the Commons.
Not exact matches
This morning's account in the Times (#)
of a «dinner table plot to unseat the
coalition» turns
out to be the second subtantial leak from the No Turning
Back Group - the right -
of - party - centre backbench dining club
of Conservative MPs
of which I was once a member.
Assuming he hasn't had a change
of heart and decided to row
back on promises set
out in the Conservative manifesto and the
Coalition Agreement, the detail in the Red Book will confirm that the UK will meet its promise to spend 0.7 %
of our national income on aid from next year.
The more seats a party or grouping has, the more chance it has
of forming a government - with 198 seats
out of 646 the Conservative Party could only form a government if significant numbers
of other MP's decided to
back them, as happened in 1924 when there was a situation that the Conservatives didn't want to form a
coalition with either other main party and equally the Liberals didn't want a
coalition with Labour and the Liberals and Conservatives saw it as an opportunity to allow Labour into government but in a situation in which legislation was still reliant on Liberal and Conservative votes and they could be brought down at the most suitable time, supposing the notional gains were accurate and in the improbable event
of the next election going exactly the same way in terms
of votes then 214
out of 650 is 32.93 %
of seats compared to at 198
out of 646 seats - 30.65 %
of seats and the Conservative Party would then be 14 seats closer towards a total neccessary to form a government allowing for the greater number
of seats, on the one hand the Conservatives need Labour to fail but equally they need to succeed themselves given that the Liberal Democrats appear likely to oppose anyone forming a government who does not embark on a serious programme to introduce PR, in addition PC & SNP would expect moves towards Independence for Scotland and Wales, the SDLP will be likely to
back Labour and equally UKIP would want a committment to withdraw from Europe and anyway will be likely to be in small numbers if any, pretty much that leaves cutting a deal with the DUP which would only add the
backing of an extra 10 - 13 MP's.
His Left - wing rhetoric will alarm many Conservatives and business leaders, who point
out that the
Coalition is asking the private sector to take the lead in hauling the economy
out of recession as the public sector is cut
back.
Following
of week
of Gov. Andrew Cuomo and surrogates pushing for a statewide universal pre-Kindergarten plan funded
out of the budget, the
coalition backing universal pre-K in the city is distributing a flyer this Caucus Weekend pushing Albany officials on the proposal
backed by New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio.
The labor -
backed Strong Economy for All
coalition is doubling down on the millionaire's tax, despite the fact that Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos flatly declared it «dead» today, sending
out another round
of mailers on the topic to constituents in nine new Senate districts.
Meanwhile, a
coalition of good - government organizations — NYPIRG, the League
of Women Voters, Reinvent Albany and Citizens Union —
backed Schneiderman's assessment
of the special prosecutor role as laid
out by Cuomo.
The AV and EU referendums failed to go his way, while five years
of coalition with the Conservatives diminished his party such that they were wiped
out at the 2015 election, with Clegg's seat, on the
back of a student vote, angry about tuition fees, turning Corbynite two years later.
Amid the rancorous
back and forth, a
coalition of transportation advocates put
out a statement urging the governor and the mayor to «move expeditiously» towards an agreement, one that includes «significantly» more city funding, and significantly more details on how Cuomo plans to fund his own promised $ 8.3 billion contribution.
Sen. Andrew Lanza (R - Staten Island) saw statements like that as signs that Democrats are trying to
back out of the reforms the
coalition passed in the coup.
«The
Coalition's crackdown on welfare abuse is welcome but Cameron needs to focus on the three pathways
out of poverty Main Warsi to ex-Labour Ministers: hand
back your severance pay»
Take
Back Parliament launched dramatically a few weeks ago, at the height
of the
coalition negotiations, when several thousand people chanting «fair votes now» and «we want to speak to Nick» gathered outside the LGA building where Nick Clegg was meeting and called the Liberal Democrat leader
out to demand he does not abandon the party's historic commitment to PR.
Well this «Referendum on the voting system used to elect MPs to the House
of Commons» came about as a result
of the bargaining carried
out in anonymous
back rooms, possibly no longer smoke filled due to Health and Safety, which resulted in the creation
of the
coalition which is now our government.
With the Tories coming
out as the biggest party in terms
of votes and seats, the assumption from those
backing Mr Cameron to stay in Number 10 is that «if the seats are there,» the Liberal Democrats will do another deal with Cameron and we'll have
coalition 2.0.
Only one in four people (26 per cent) who voted Liberal Democrat in May agree that the party should now pull
out of the
Coalition, as do 27 per cent
of those who
backed the Tories.
The Guardian's Lenore Taylor has pointed
out that while the
Coalition is bringing
back the «carbon tax» scare campaign
of 2013, its own scheme would have to draw on the «safeguard mechanism» component
of Direct Action — which is itself a disguised ETS — to have any chance
of meeting the targets.
Dave Snyder, the executive director
of the California Bicycle
Coalition,
backed the state's new legislation based partly on the idea that e-bikes help
out those who «just can't ride as far or as fast as they need to.»