Too
bad about the fuel economy.
Not exact matches
Beijing is trying to boost domestic liquidity in the hopes that this will generate stronger domestic demand, but expanding liquidity
fuels capital outflows, and these put downward pressure on the currency, while increasing PBoC concerns
about the monetary impact of money leaving the
economy which, as an article in last week's FT argues, might be
worse than we think.
I m really lucky with the car, but the
fuel economy isn t really that great... its not
about the money, but I have a
bad feeling burning so much gas, cause I driving a lot of km / year.
I actually considered buying a Lincoln Navigator but the
fuel economy was too
bad... the odyssey has 20/28 mpg, is just as spactious, and comes with more options for a lower price... well not that low...
About 40K with all the options
That falls significantly below the EPA's estimates of 28 city mpg and 40 highway, but if experience has taught me anything
about three Car Tech editors sharing a car that claims a sporty pedigree, it's that our observed
fuel economy is usually something of a
worst - case scenario.
The Sienna $ 1,130 AWD upcharge isn't
bad, but all - wheel - drive costs you
about 10 % on
fuel economy: 16 mpg city, 23 mpg highway, 19 mpg combined, vs. 18/25/21 for front - drive, which is another 1 - 2 mpg short of the class leader Odyssey.
[15] However, after criticism and lawsuits
about worse - than - expected real - world
fuel economy, in August 2013 Ford voluntarily lowered the EPA ratings and issued customer rebates.
A lot of things have an influence on the
fuel economy of a car: Driving style, weather (mileage can drop quite a bit during winter), tire pressure (we wrote
about that),
badly tuned engine, carrying unnecessary weight in the car, idling, cold engine & catalytic converter, etc..
Sadly, most people just assume that their car gets the sticker mpg, or
worse, they don't even think
about it (something else that a little
fuel economy screen on the dash would help change).