Sentences with phrase «bad arguments with»

But in legal writing and advocacy, including bad arguments with good ones is a dangerous game.

Being aware of her mood would help you a lot to seduce her, if she has been working hard during whole day or had bad arguments with colleagues or boss will provide some hurdles to you.

Not exact matches

Nothing is worse after a car accident — fender bender or otherwise — than having an argument with the other driver about what really happened.

«Now we have a very clear argument for why it is a bad idea to store data in a centralized fashion with an American company,» Zwart said.

The problem with this argument is that what is good for oil producers and exporters is inversely bad for major oil consumers and importers like the United States, Europe, and China in this zero sum game of global energy markets.

But from what I can gather, the Brits probably mopped the floor with the Americans — the former's bad arguments being less bad than the latter's.

Although the argument is a mere two sentences, it aptly summarizes why many Christians are no help in the pursuit of racial justice, and it is loaded with a myriad of bad ideas — an impressive accomplishment for 11 words.

Stern notes the argument that an overly aggressive legislative (and by implication, police) response to militias might risk increasing the militias» paranoia, but he dismisses it with the flat assertion that the militias are already so paranoid that their attitude simply can not get any worse.

Badly written, pretentious and irresponsible in its claims and arguments, wholly lacking in historical sophistication and mastery of its sources, it nevertheless remains our only theological correlation of the original religious ground of Christianity with the higher religious expressions of Oriental mysticism.

Eric: Please don't confuse unity and tolerance with the lack of argument, debate, heated discussion, or even bad language.

nakedpastor said, on December 10th, 2009 at 2:36 pm Eric: Please don't confuse unity and tolerance with the lack of argument, debate, heated discussion, or even bad language.

no no no, i first engage them in a conversation... normally ending badly due to them not liking my choice of argument or tools i use in a conversation over belief... so in short i am norally the one insulted and left to think... which i believe is the same way children act when they hear the word «NO»... but i have had some great conversations with people over religion, its just a rare thing.

I don't bother with many other comment sections on the internet, so if she wants to explain to me how a complete lack of proof led her in one of the worst possible directions or how her lack of understanding of morals and ethics lead her to choose the most criminal of religious cults to join..., then that would be great and I'm sure we could all enjoy picking apart her arguments for her «conversion» to those of us who know the difference between reason, logic, common sense, and ethics and morals and empathy and sympathy... as I would guess she doesn't give a crap anyway I doubt she'll show up here.

When we familiarize ourselves with only one side of the debate (typically the side ultimately found to be just) we miss the full depth of the argument and, worse yet, slip into a sort of historical amnesia that allows us to believe we too would have chosen the side of good on account of its seemingly obvious virtue.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

Indeed, even one of the worthies quoted on the back cover has got it wrong: Wilson does not argue that «the criminal justice system has become a kind of theater of the absurd» with murder «explained away by arguments like having a bad day.»

We need to invent a new word for people willing to believe the writings of unknown authors, of unknown origin, of an unknown but ancient time, which is badly worded, internally AND externally (with modern science) inconsistent, full of statements with no actual arguments to back them up, with the only decently educated people to back it all up are theologians who twist the meaning of words and commit logical fallacies and still only try to prove that SOMETHING must exist, not that christianity is the truth.

You are not one of them however since any argument you tend to make has the bad habit of being laced with pointless insults.

This whole «buying broccoli argument is one of the worst the Right Wing has ever come up with.

Okay, Free Will: Again and again, I've heard the argument that when bad people do horrible things, God does not interfere, because that would interfere with that person's free will.

Whether it's on a Sunday, Tuesday, a bad work day, or because of an argument with a friend, little indulgences often make us feel better.

SSS arguments with grandiose conclusions are almost always bad, and this article is no exception.

It's tough to make a compelling argument for a quarterback when his team finishes with the third - worst record in the league, but Rivers is still a talented quarterback with tremendous value to the spread.

As long as the bad luck with injuries does not come back with a bang, there is a good argument that Wenger already has the tools to challenge for the Premier League.

City has been performing worse than Arsenal over the past 3 seasons so don't come here with that «trophies» argument because city has been doing that less often than Arsenal.

My second argument is Ramsey's poor passing and selfish play compares badly with Thomas Rosicky's recent brilliant form?

I apologize if i'm speaking for you in the wrong context Jonestown, but I think he was trying to point out that these «squad» players that people seem to want so badly may not be as stoked at the competition within our team as we would be... Sure there's arguments for a quality upgrade with a few players, but a few may have to leave before anyone comes in.

Tebow, a 30 - year - old player who has a defensive ceiling as a bad corner outfielder, hit.226 /.309 /.347 against teenagers and 21 - year - olds, which would suggest that there are, oh, about 100 to 200 players with a better argument for an invitation.

These signings undeniably look bad in retrospect, but the argument defending Pace's approach is that he was able to bet on five different players with potential upside with minimal long - term (or even medium - term) cost to the franchise.

Children seem to «excuse» their mothers» negative behaviour in arguments with their fathers more readily than they do fathers», more commonly attributing it to «state» («the mum had a bad day») than to trait («it's because of the kind of person the dad is»)(Weston et al, 1998).

Misery enjoys company: Ever have a bad day, come home and picked an argument with a «safe person?»

I refuse to teach her to read before they do it in school (unless she picks it up on her own), the best argument I heard was that if the child learns to read to early s / he will be bored in class with all the consequences of it (bad behavior, starting to dislike learning, and what not).

It gives those of us who are a little granola (not organic, vegan, made with nothing but love granola) a bad rep.. That goes for both sides of every argument.

So, our debate with the Lib - Dems and their supporters should not be about the fairness of cuts - which ends up with short - term / long - term arguments - but the kamikazi economics of the coalition agreement, which threatens at worst a return to recession and at best low levels of growth.

He had either under - performed so badly that he was not fit for his office, their argument went: or, in fact, he had actually connived and plotted, along with his office, to help the Leave camp that he so obviously backed in private.

Rather disarmingly for an election campaign with a lot of bad blood flowing around the two seem to get on pretty well, as if this were a case of two mates having a political argument all over the street.

I would argue, even ignoring all the other arguments above, that if this was the entirety of the issue with marijuana it should be made legal on the grounds that freedom of choice, even bad choices, should be favored if the harm is minor enough; as shown by our legalizing of other equally or more addictive drugs.

Opinion on whether HS2 is a good or bad idea is divided to say the very least, and I don't propose to go into the arguments here although for the sake of full disclosure, I'm on the side of the antis, but it did annoy me that many people who were protesting that it would have a devastating effect on their lives were waved away with the flick of a railway engineer's hand.

The problem with this is that Hannan didn't actually write this, so this is a strawman argument — your own quote of him reads «some of the worst health outcomes in the industrialised world».

«We're learning that kids who drink alone tend to do so because they're feeling lonely, are in a bad mood, or had an argument with a friend,» said lead author Kasey Creswell, assistant professor of psychology in CMU's Dietrich College of Humanities and Social Sciences.

Whether it's an argument with a loved one, a project at work gone horribly wrong, or something far worse, we've all had those times when our minds just won't let us move on.

I'm always «fighting» with ignorant people who use «the blue guys» as PROOF that colloidal silver is bad... these arguments coming, of course, from people who will eat pharmaceutical poisons without thinking twice!!!!! Wow.»

It is entirely possible that the fact that these populations eat a plant based diet is irrelevant to the lack of heart disease it could easily be another factor or more likely multiple different factors working together that explain the lack of heart disease.That said I happen to agree with you, but that's a really bad argument.

Dr. Seyfried and Dominic D'Agostino aren't making that argument either, but I think what they bring to this is a fresh perspective that in many ways if it's true, it can be more empowering for people that are dealing with cancer, and the risk of cancer, because it offers a lever for intervention and treatment above and beyond just the idea that «Oh, I have bad genes and there's not really anything I can do about it.»

Oddly enough, there seems to be significant support for, and I haven't heard any argument against the idea that stress in many forms including worrying about diet can be very bad for your health with possible connections to cancer via free radicals and chemistry changes in the body.

An argument with his lughead roommates ends with his being given the worst dorm room on campus.

But Stallone makes his one - sided, pro-interventionist argument with such intoxicating fervor — especially in an astonishingly bloody finale filled with decapitations, bullet - riddled bad guys and a visual equation of Rambo to Jesus Christ — that the fantasy becomes impossible to resist.

(I just had an argument with someone who didn't like Brooklyn because he felt that the indecisiveness of Saoirse Ronan's Eilis made her a bad role model.

The Keaton and Fonda story lines suffer from fake, concocted arguments with their respective lovers — the bane of all bad romantic comedies, and this time we get it double.

starts with a full moon, scary music, and even a lone wolf howling as Russ and Lina are startled from bed (and their argument about whose job is worse) by an unexpected noise.