As
bad as a the politician by the looks of it.
Not exact matches
As a rare CEO of a big bank who avoided the
worst of the mortgage crisis, Mr. Dimon carries an influential voice, and one that many
politicians would rather not hear.
No one is saying that the other religions / philosopies are not
as bad, although I have never heard of a
politician who follows Buddhist tradition trying to stop legalization of abortions, or an adherent of Jainism trying to stop same sex marriage.
Wow.Mr.Limbaugh's belated «apology «aside, I find myself stunned at the level of vitriol, rudeness, and sheer hatred we seem determined to spew at each across the web nowadays; its advent has obviously unleashed some deeply - buried, long - simmering resevoirs of hate, scorn, and opprobium that has finally boiled over among many of us.If we spent even a third of that energy seeking solutions to righting the
badly - listing ship - of - state called America... Well.The
politicians aren't going to do it, fellow citizens.
As clever
as we think we are venting over folly and nonsense on these websites, we had better get busy getting our nation's affairs in order, or we'll become the laughingstock of the world, with tiny,no - name third world countries thumbing their noses at us and telling us to «Get lost, America, you silly, Hollywood has - been.
Afraid of being branded
as moralists, or even
worse, proselytizers,
politicians cling to surface arguments that remain in the public's comfort zone, choosing sides in the familiar debates on school prayer, pornography, media immorality and abortion.
In many eerie ways, this echoes the devolution of Adolf Hitler, although he began
as a
politician, then became his own amateur general (and a stubborn, unteachable one, and therefore a
bad one); and then, pretty much skipping the whole serpent phase, he ended up
as a spent, pathetic, vegetarian toad.
Which
politicians wouldn't be interested in something UNICEF describe
as «a natural safety net against the
worst effects of poverty» or a factor shown to have a significant impact on the national economy?
So despite the fact that it isn't necessarily a «
bad» word, populism is seen
as a
bad thing because it's a stance usually adopted by
politicians whose intentions are not aligned with the best interests of the populace.
And while the globe faces a no less complex scenario than in 1974 the reaction is to shrug our collective shoulders at best and at
worst talk down politics and write off
politicians as venal and selfish.
Marching around saying it's «bullshit» whilst our
politicians tour their constituencies in stab - proof vests, our bankers screw society for personal gain, our teachers describe classrooms
as battlegrounds, our towns and parks have become no - go zones most evenings, our social workers come across the most appalling instances of abuse, just to name but a few of the most obvious examples - well, I think you need to produce a little more than some statistics and a bit of
bad language to turn the narrative around.
For the record, while the politically powerful Nehru - Gandhi family has shown that concession was not a
bad venture
as some may think, the incommodious confusion of political party action with family matters by some particularly petty
politicians, in my view, runs against the grain of human values.
Just
as the Catholic Church, for example, struggles to deal with its own
bad applies, so
politicians must now confront the inherent weaknesses of their own arrangements.
The routine relies mainly on video segments of embarrassing errors by right - wing
politicians — of which the hardened observer is likely to have seen already —
as he gently guides his audience through a brief history of the
worst the Republican party has to offer.
But there is
bad new for all
politicians as the poll investigated the public's feelings about the current media storm about MPs» pay and expenses:
Johnson and other city
politicians deserve their problems because they are making it
worse by cozying up to the governor against what they view
as a weakened, lame - duck mayor.
The participants saw themselves
as being potentially the
worst affected by spending cuts, not least because they perceived
politicians to take less notice of the views of young people than of those of older generations.
When you've had a
bad day
as a
politician, pretty much the last person you want to be sitting opposite is Andrew Neil.
Just using the expenses scandal,
as Labour
politicians and the prime minister are trying to do, to excuse their very
bad performance, I think, is a red herring.
We think that if you are a
politician in charge of a department, and a department does its job
as badly as the Home Office has clearly been doing, then you should resign.
An official internal inquiry into why the Lib Dems did so
badly in this year's local elections has pointed the finger at advertising campaigns such
as one which portrayed the
politician as «Cleggzilla», trampling over public services.
And apart from the narrowing of the polls, there was some
bad news for the Tory leader,
as 62 per cent of voters described him
as a lightweight
politician, compared to 57 per cent a year ago.
As I stated the other day when calling on the governor to rescind this misguided action, everyone but the governor and some other
politicians seem to understand that laying people off is
bad for the economy.
Labour
politicians, especially the surly Ed Balls and Ed Miliband, are portrayed
as the
bad guys: tribal, belligerent, arrogant and against coalition.
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said that
as a
politician you must «always plan for the
worst», and «that is what Jeremy Hunt is doing» with Ebola screening.
Andrew Lansley, long on death row since his health reform train crash, is out —
as he should be, a decent man but a
bad politician.
The
worst conclusion to draw from the parliamentary expenses scandal would be,
as the cliche has it, that «
politicians are all the same».
In episode 206, Michael maneuvers for power
as he and Kath prepare for an addition to the family; Tommy tries to clean up a
bad neighborhood; Eileen gains perspective from the wives of other local
politicians; Rose struggles with the reality of aging.
Or
worse -
as Mosley notes in his autobiography, if an accident on the magnitude of the 1955 Le Mans disaster occurred, «we would risk
politicians banning motor sport».
So, all right: the surge in
politicians» incomes over the past decade isn't quite
as bad as it appears at first glance.
Most
politicians do not have a clue
as to what the real world is dealing with and I know there are way
worse stories out there than mine.
Of course no
politician is ever going to mention a tax, or
worse, mandatory reductions in work so
as to reduce carbon emissions quickly.
Thus, any
politician that actually advocates or agrees to anything truly effective and equitable, which can so easily (given the mentality) be framed
as «putting the country at a competitive disadvantage», will surely LOSE the next election — BIG TIME in the
bad economic times that will surely prevail.
The study comes
as scientists have predicted proliferation of these blooms
as the climate changes, and amid increasing attention by the news media and local
politicians to the
worst cases.
Worse, the news media, climate activists,
politicians, and regulators treat the «projections»
as predictions, or forecasts, for purposes of stirring up public anxiety and trying to justify draconian anti-fossil-fuel policies.
Compared with the radical know - nothing litmus test for
politicians we see now, on climate science most of the Bush Administration,
bad as it was, was downright nuanced and moderate.Link to archived 11 - minute audio webcast.
It is
bad enough that
politicians such
as Whitehouse and Grijalvi are playing this sort of political game with science and scientists, but I regard it
as highly unethical for scientists to support defeating scientists with whom you disagree by such methods.
The coal industry and
politicians traditionally labeled active community members
as «environmentalists» with the thought that it was a
bad thing.
As for the mushiness, Tierney needs to keep in mind that while the field welcomes criticism, it would be nice if said critics would actually try to work through the established scientific conferences and organizations instead of running out and trying to sway the public and
politicians instead (again, another
bad habit they seem to share in common with the creationists).
This large a change would bring out pitchforks and torches
as people realize just how
badly they've been used by a small group of scientists and
politicians, how much they are the victims of indefensible abuse of statistics to average in the terrible with the merely poor
as if they are all equally likely to be true with randomly distributed differences.
The six
politicians who earned top honors
as the «
worst of the
worst» in supporting policies that keep energy prices high and disproportionately hurt low - income families are these: Joker: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Joker: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid Ace of Spades: U.S. Senator Dick Durbin Ace of Diamonds: U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer Ace of Clubs: U.S. Rep. George Miller (D - CA) Ace of Hearts: U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D - MA) http://www.stopwaronpoor.org/
Evidence must re-engineer what I want
as a
politician, if not, the evidence is
bad.
As usual with tech and politics,
bad reporting combined with weak technical literacy among
politicians is confusing matters (though of course I'm all for Zuck being asked questions by Congress).
I don't need to hear every death, every fight, every
politician slamming each other, or
worse, getting caught with their pants down,
as it seems to be the norm lately (for Pete's sake, keep it in your pants or get a divorce!).
Our system of «Governance» is
badly broken and needs a total overhaul and until that happens the Agent's seemingly bottomless pockets will be picked to support an every growing increasingly expensive bureaucracy and their voices will continue to fall on deaf ears much the same
as they currently are by elected
politicians at all levels of Government in Canada.
All of those
politicians are
as bad as each other.