Not exact matches
At best such references evade the issue and give Hartshorne's doctrine of actuality an illusory air of plausibility; at worst they implicitly trade on ideas foreign to Hartshorne's own premise
At best such references evade the issue and give Hartshorne's doctrine of actuality an illusory air of plausibility;
at worst they implicitly trade on ideas foreign to Hartshorne's own premise
at worst they implicitly trade on ideas foreign to Hartshorne's own
premises.
I'm not saying spending on the OL is a
bad idea, or that you are wrong
at all, because I do agree with your basic
premise.
This whimsical story illustrates the unexpected outcomes of one little girl's
bad mood, and Lemony Snicket's presentation
at the BBF is guaranteed to banish any
bad moods from the
premises!
The game is honestly quite boring, despite its bizarre
premise, and the attempts
at humour are ham - fisted
at best and excruciating
at worst.
Don't be duped, if this
premise sounds
at all appealing, for Delta Farce is easily one of the
worst films released this year.
It was a middling effort — not a
bad premise, decent cast, pleasant enough to look
at.
With the body - swap
premise — something made even more ridiculous by the fact that Cage and Travolta looked absolutely nothing like one another — both Cage and Travolta got a good crack
at playing Castor Troy, the movie's delectably over-the-top
bad guy.
It is a blood fest bore in very
bad taste which tries
at some points to bring sentiment to its dull
premise.
I have definitely dropped that money on
worse production before, but this one has so much star power and a fun
premise (or
at least it sounded that way) that I feel this was one of the least risky choices I've made as far as going into a movie I know very little (or nothing) about.
The writing is always very good
at worst — and brilliant
at best — there are new developments for every regular [and major recurring] character; the most mundane events take on unexpected significance, while major events, no matter how seemingly over the top they might be, are so well grounded in the reality of the show's
premise that they feel completely natural.
The first
Bad Moms managed to greatly exceed box office expectations last year, and despite its cookie - cutter
premise and execution it turned out to still be an enjoyable time
at the movies.
When revealed, the intriguing
premise of the actual City of a Thousand Planets serves only a small purpose in the scheme of things and the film is not above (
bad) slapstick
at times.
, it comes out that Con Air screenwriter Scott Rosenberg, who just might be
worse than George Lucas
at making up names (one of the two main cops in Gone in Sixty Seconds is christened Detective Drycoff), begged onto the project after getting wind of the
premise, though no one so much as alludes to the Halicki film.
«Millennials versus Gen - X» was an idea that sounded
bad in theory and
worse when the season started with Jeff Probst straining
at every turn to use the thinnest
premises to contrast the generations.
It's not hard to see the appeal of a movie like this — again, the
premise is a slam - dunk as far as high - concept comedies go — but the execution is,
at best, lacking, and
at worst, baffling (why, for example, does this movie have more false endings than
Based on the novel by Richard Bachman
at a time when many (including the filmmakers) didn't know that Bachman was a pseudonym for Stephen King, this Arnold Schwarzenegger vehicle is a particular kitschy piece of 80s Arnie action, with a great
premise and some potent underlying themes
badly handled by scripter Steven E. de Souza and especially director Paul Michael Glaser.
At first glance, it would seem like an amusing
premise for a satire, yet for large stretches the film takes itself seriously on the one hand, then completely goes for
bad over-the-top theatrics and schlock in the other.
It's too
bad, then, that so much was squandered on dumb gore effects, dumber creature effects, and a
premise that only works as a metaphor — a clumsy one,
at that.
The
premise is that super-villains come together to form a team and try to save the day for once (One has to assume that every superhero came down with a
bad case of food poisoning
at the meeting to set up their own team).
Filling in the air time of this wacky
premise are nonstop vulgarities (
worse than Superbad, pervasive drug use (not as
bad as Half - Baked) and some of the most infantile attempts
at humor not seen since the misunderstood Freddy Got Fingered.
Simple
premise, two funny leads with a proven chemistry between them, and lead by
BAD TEACHER director Jake Kasdan, son of THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK scribe, Lawrence Kasdan, this should be something worth few chuckles
at least.
This would apply to «persistent offenders»
at non-domestic
premises activated by proven malfunctioning or
badly installed equipment.
Our sympathies go out to the victims of the Woodlake Apartments fire, and we note that it could have been much
worse — because the fire happened in the middle of the afternoon, many residents were
at work or otherwise off the
premises so
at this time there appears to have been no loss of life.
It's kinder to your dog, as it stops him from having
bad behavior reinforced (passersby will continue to pass by when he barks and rushes
at them, which makes him think that he's responsible for their leaving the immediate
premises), and will result in a calmer, quieter, less keyed - up Jack Russell.
At their
worst, they can cause havoc in a household whose owners have failed to dog - proof the
premises beforehand.
However, while the
premise and design hints
at a deep game, instead we have a game that encapsulates the
worst elements of old school adventure titles.
The game's
premise is certainly not a
bad story
at all, especially when you consider platformers are not known for their riveting storylines.
To an extent, I'm willing to accept the
premise that many of these beasties are grunts for big
bad Bowser, particularly the ones throwing hammers or boomerangs directly
at the plumber's head, but I just can't bring myself to attack the Wigglers.
The
premise sounds pretty interesting and engrossing
at first, but Ranpo Kitan: Game of Laplace has more in store — for better or
worse.
If you study the conservative approach to climate change policy long enough, the implication that they are trying to participate in a scientific conversation starts to fade away and you realize the underlying logic they are using actually starts from the conclusion that regulation and government intervention are
bad and proceeds to the
premise that there is no real problem with climate change,
at which point, they pick around for snippets to support their
premise.
a) they don't believe the
premise of man - made climate change: they don't think scientific data collected to date is adequate to prove conclusively that any type of man - made event can result in either the recent fluxuations in climate or the anticipated kinds of drastic climate change, therefore CO2 control would be ineffective
at solving the problem b) they don't believe CO2 alone is responsible: they think other variables are as or more likely to be the catalysts or causes for the scientific data collected to date on climate change therefore CO2 control would be ineffective
at solving the problem c) they believe government efforts to curb CO2 emissions will fail resulting in an unprecedented waste of money and
worse economic conditions.
Manacker writes: «AGW skeptics should be happy to see their skepticism has been validated, while those who supported the IPCC
premise should be relieved that the «C» has been taken out of CAGW and that the failure to agree on global mitigation actions
at Doha may not have been such a
bad thing, after all.»
Herman Alexander Pope's model — too qualitative M.A.Vukcevic — too obscure Fred H. Haynie —
bad premise Oliver K. Manuel — whacko Harry Dale Huffman — double whacko Girma Orssengo — trendology does not make a model Tony (climatereason) Brown — reliance on anecdotal info David Postma —
bad physics Arno Arrack —
bad writing makes it inscrutable Nasif Nahle —
bad experimentation Chief Hydrologist — appeal to authority model Joachim Seifert — if I have to pay for it, it's not worth looking
at Stephen Wilde — a lawyer's model Nicola Scafetta — use enough variables and one can fit anything Alexander Biggs — a half - way - there model The SkyDragons — say no more «Joe's World» LaLonde — an idea written with crayons Stefan «TheDenier» Mikitch — a crazed Chewbacca Defense model David Wojick — some sort of anti-model that teaches «controversy» Doug Cotton — a SkyDragon acolyte Paul Vaughn — Pay him some money please so he can work his ideas out
Most attempts
at suppression rest on a denial of the fundamental
premise of democracy: that the ordinary individual, by exercising critical judgment, will select the good and reject the
bad.
This means that if the lawyers were unable to get onto their
premises, eg as a result of fire or flood, then access to systems and documents would,
at best, be limited, and
at worst, work would have to cease altogether.
Let's start with the
premise that our industry is notoriously
bad at Intake.
Personal Injury Car Accidents Truck Accidents Wrongful Death Motorcycle Accidents Dog Bites / Attacks Bicycle Accidents Child Injury — Day Care Injury — School Accidents — Sex Abuse — Clergy Abuse — Foster Home / DSHS Slip and Fall / Trip and Fall Workplace Injuries Pedestrian and Crosswalk Nursing Home Injuries Construction accidents Drunk Driving Accidents Medical Malpractice Maritime Accidents / Injuries
At Sea Products Liability Negligence Insurance Claims Insurance
Bad Faith Unpaid Wages Disability Insurance Disputes Sexual Harassment Employment Discrimination Age Discrimination
Premises Liability / Store & Department Stores
I have seen a fair amount of recent liberal legal scholarship that really does seem to recapitulate, in its unthinking doctrinairism and unquestioning use of contestable
premises, everything the Crits wrote about and against, while operating
at a fairly high level of either
bad faith and denial, or amnesia.
Our sympathies go out to the victims of the Woodlake Apartments fire, and we note that it could have been much
worse — because the fire happened in the middle of the afternoon, many residents were
at work or otherwise off the
premises so
at this time there appears to have been no loss of life.
If a non-relative visitor to your home gets injured while on the rental
premises (from a slip and fall, a
bad cut, etc.), it is quite possible you may be looking
at a liability situation.