Too often you hear investors making very
bad decisions based on this use of YOC.
Uninformed webmasters make
bad decisions based on uninformative responses from Google and misleading internet comments
When you fail to do so, you're liable to make
bad decisions based on faulty information, as I recently learned.
They worked with me so that I would not make
a bad decision based on what I could really afford.
Ask a criminal defense lawyer, a divorce attorney or a bankruptcy lawyer how often they've seen a good person make
a bad decision based on emotion.
Observation at junctions — not looking enough, or making
a bad decision based on your observations
Not exact matches
Jon Bon Jovi
on how he feels Steve Jobs and iTunes have altered the music - buying experience... for the
worse The Sunday Times, March 2011 Kids today have missed the whole experience of putting the headphones
on, turning it up to 10, holding the jacket, closing their eyes and getting lost in an album, and the beauty of taking your allowance money and making a
decision based on the jacket, not knowing what the record sounded like, and looking at a couple of still pictures and imagining it.
Based on today's
decisions at least, Siegel will not have to do what she most dislikes about her job: Delivering
bad, sometimes crushing, news to a rejected applicant.
Also, «One dollar per month domains was a really
bad idea,» he says, referencing his
decision to try selling custom URLs at Web.com
on a monthly
basis.
Optimizing
based on click - throughs isn't much better, resulting in
bad decisions 17 % of the time.
Your financial choices and
decisions should be
based on your objectives, risk tolerance and time horizon — not
on what everyone else is doing, or
worse, moves
based on market panic.
The
WORST thing you can do is panic like the media, make emotional
decisions, and watch the news
on a minute by minute
basis which will make your emotions go even crazier.
The one thing they all have in common is willingness to believe without question
based on nothing more than faith — the world's
worst decision - making method.
Beliefs that hinge
on a guess can't be taken lightly, but we have a lot of people making their own
bad decisions that are
based on their treating their religious path as fashion or a trend rather than something to be lived.
On the other hand, using that as a
basis to say authorities should be «protecting» us from
bad life
decisions and taxing us simply because we have more than our neighbor is irrational and self - destructive.
Some how it's felt that values, morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds and reject
bad deeds and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures and beliefs... Laws or God and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built
on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but as can see now it is build
on groundless
bases if not of words of God to faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make
decisions of faith but at the moment the secular world make and take the
decisions while the beliefs and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!
Philosophy does not exist, however, without the readiness of the philosophizing man to make
decisions,
on the
basis of known truth, as to whether a thought is right or wrong, an action good or
bad.
These guys have a
bad habit of making major, kingdom - wide
decisions based on personal offense and whims, and should not be crossed.
Faith is the world's
worst way of making
decisions, which is why it's the only one religions have to rely
on, because if you used any of the more reliable methods (like looking at the evidence, or logic, or confidence in something
based on its past track record), you'd laff your head off at such nonsense and even more so at the solemn, self - righteous credulity of its proponents.
This directly affects the atheist who often sees
bad policy
decisions and laws being made
based on belief.
«What I told Larry was that if you look at it
on the
basis of two games, then it was a
bad decision.
Your
decision - making can end up
based on surprises or
on keeping your opponent off your scent,
on what is
worst for the opponent rather than what is best for you.
Thank you for you honest analytical viewpoint ken and backing me up
on the punctuation my phone is problematic and to get all the marks right takes three times or more as long but i feel the content is there, and rsh i was not hiding behind referee
decisions i said clearly that you do nt win or lose
based on the refs you have 90 minutes to win a game i was meaning overall across the league this year its been
bad almost as
bad as our honor as club supporters we made to a final and win ir lose that looks good to people across the globe but the fans embarrassed the club
on a global stage by walking out no honor in defeat.
Just like the stock market sometimes reacts in a non pragmatic manner, but even
worse for the UFC «rankings» because it is
based on a much smaller group of actors who are not even investing actual money in their
decisions / opinions.
They will be left rueing the
decisions that allow the club to claim the crown of the
worst pair of loans in Premier League history
based on cost and performance.
PUTTING BODY
ON THE LINE???? I PERSONNALY THINK THAT THIS IS PART OF THE BUSINESS, This is the players» personnal problem based on the decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BOR
ON THE LINE???? I PERSONNALY THINK THAT THIS IS PART OF THE BUSINESS, This is the players» personnal problem
based on the decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BOR
on the
decision that they have made to be a Pro-Football player.This is what they are paid for (Millions and millions of wages), and they have to take the risk
on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the worse thing yesterday is that it was BOR
on their own sake.To give an angle of an undertanding perspective as Arsenal Fan and as WE all have been always doing, i think The players might have been frustrated from seeing what happened to Rosicky and Eduardo so that they do nt wan na risk so much for the sake of their future carriere as they are also still young.May be!!!??? We do nt know!!!! But for me: If they are appointed and have decided to engage themself into the PL game and the CL and agreed to take the wages then they have to do the task that they are suuposed to do, regardless of their ages and personnal condition.We pay the most expensive ticket with hope in mind to see our team fighting NOT FORCELY WINNING.Evrybody here understand all the PBM, and i repeat again, EVEN IF WE HAVE LOST THE GAME BUT WE DID GIVE OUR BEST AND FOUGHT TILL THE END, THEN ITS UNDERSTANDABLE.WE WILL ALL LEAVE THE EMIRATES AT THE END OF THE GAME WITH PRIDE IN OUR HEART.AND the
worse thing yesterday is that it was BORO.
We all have the choice to make good or
bad decisions, and the people who do these violent acts are making choices not
based on love and compassion.
As someone who was talked OUT OF an epidural even though I very much wanted one, I can say it's much
worse when someone refused to listen to your very real request for an intervention then when they speak to you about an intervention like you are an adult making a
decision based on facts.
When trainees make career
decisions based on generalized statements such as: «Medical writers are freelancers,» or «Management consulting is a
bad fit for me because they have 80 % travel,» it's an indication that they have not done enough research.
During the Vietnam War, soldiers blamed the number crunchers — those informing
decisions in the Pentagon
based on body counts and kill ratios — for the war's
bad turn.
Moreover, it seems that the mothers make their
decision based on some facts talking about foreigners and their
bad behaviors towards Ukrainian women for marriage.
Basing a television show
on a 20 - year - old movie (and one that had already been turned — unsuccessfully — into a TV series in 1990) is an odd
decision in itself, but NBC's new «Parenthood» has also been plagued by
bad luck, with original star Maura Tierney forced to drop out due to health problems and the show bounced from fall until March.
Worse,
decisions are
based on geographic or enrollment considerations, not performance.
«I tell them, you're
basing your opinion
on some officers that made a
bad decision — I'm not that dude.»
The scenarios are
based on the historical Pilate and some of the
decisions he had to make, so if you know the background you can explain what Pilate actually did and student can discuss whether he was a good or
bad ruler.
That's a shame, since the same basic dysfunctions that ail general education afflict special education too: middling (or
worse) teacher quality; an inclination to throw «more people» at any problem; a reluctance to look at cost - effectiveness; a crazy quilt of governance and
decision - making authorities; a tendency to add rather than replace or redirect; and a full -
on fear of results -
based accountability.
What I can say is that in a data - driven system, schools like BCHS that are explicitly designed to take the students with the
worst data need to be very carefully reviewed when
decisions are made
based on their data.
Now to be clear, here, I do think that not just «grossly ineffective» but also simply «
bad teachers» should be fired, but the indicators used to do this must yield valid inferences, as
based on the evidence, as critically and appropriately consumed by the parties involved, after which valid and defensible
decisions can and should be made.
From my vantage, I can't tell if it was a good or a
bad decision, but if were made
on the
basis of the information that you provided, there is a very good chance that they have erred.
Not only is the argument outrageous and
based on your
bad gas, but your
decision to post a rant about the «wrong» type of book readers
on a blog targeted at readers is lunacy.
And while much of this might seem like nothing more than petty playground behavior between children who honestly do not have a clear good guy or
bad guy, keep in mind that several ebook retailers incorporate the Goodreads» API into their sales pages, effectively posting book reviews that many in the Goodreads community knew to be false, and nothing more than an act of revenge against an author; real - world sales
decisions have been made by consumers
based on these reviews.
Even
worse, in addition to plastering the horrifically awful Metro UI GUI
on top of Windows 8 so Microsoft could pretend an 18 - wheeler is an automobile, Microsoft also made the completely insane
decision to try to FORCE their entire installed enterprise and SMB
base to embrace that same horrifically awful, productively killing, unintuitive, ergonomically destructive touch interface
on ALL PCs!
But it won't help writers who make their career
decisions based on outdated myths and
bad information.
He's shining a bright light in an otherwise dark corner... Our industry has
basing business
decisions on bad data.
Lenders may impose stricter guidelines
on a loan that is written for
bad credit, and
base their
decisions upon what you have proven to other lenders in the past, without regard to the situation that you were in at the time.
This may not end up so good for you, if that happens, which is why it is always best to make a
decision on the type of loan you will pursue
based on what you know you can afford, in the
worst case scenario.
Most important to the plaintiffs is their built - in protection against having settlement funds dissipate too quickly
based on bad financial
decisions.
That
bad credit score is
based on a variety of factors like your ability to pay off more debt, your credit history and other things that might help creditors make the
decision whether you will pay them back.
I only ask because I have heard of people getting
bad financial advice, and then make
decisions based on it.
Asking «what if» is generally an indicator that you are
basing your
decision on a
worst case scenario.