Science: Mostly via statistical epidemiology,
bad effects of smoking were clearno later than 1964's report of the Surgeon General.
Not exact matches
The
effects of secondhand
smoke are as
bad as
smoking itself.
The
effects of secondhand
smoke can often be as
bad as
smoking a cigarette directly.
And according to Dr. Valter Longo, a researcher studying the
effects of dietary protein on health, there is convincing evidence that a high - protein diet — particularly if the proteins are derived from animals — is nearly as
bad as
smoking for your health, BUT, the big caveat: These
effects were either abolished or reduced in individuals eating a high - protein diet that was mainly plant based.
Enter the 3,000 - mile wide ship, which penetrates Earth's atmosphere in a bland haze
of smoke and flame (All
of the
effects are, at best, unconvincing or, at
worst, indecipherable on account
of the movie's hyperactive style).
So other than loading up the kids and dogs in the SUV and heading to the coast (not a
bad idea), what, if anything can be done to decrease the adverse
effects of the
smoke on us and the animals in our care?
I think you could make the case that consistently breathing PM from wood burning fires would be much
worse for those individuals than the longer term ill
effects of global warming, etc.... just as it would be
worse for individuals to be in the path
of coal burning
smoke as opposed to suffering the long term consequences.
Bad habits such as
smoking cigarettes and consumption
of alcohol have an adverse
effect on the premium amount.
Most know about the
worst health
effects of smoking, and wish they had never started.