«It's
bad for human rights, it's bad for our justice system, and it's bad for our taxpayers.»
As stated earlier, I agree with the point that tropospheric aerosols from fossil fuels are incredibly
bad for human health and other environmental impacts (black carbon soot, acid rain, radioactive emissions, mercury poisoning), putting us in a situation of damned if we do, damned if we don't.
New York Times More on Swine - Related Diseases Swine Flu: What You Need to Know Antiviral Tamiflu Stockpiling Fast, Despite Unclear Health and Environmental Effects Pork Chops Won't Give You Swine Flu, But Here Are Other Reasons to Abstain Follow the Swine Flu (H1N1) with Google Maps Swine Flu Reveals: What's Bad for the Environment is
Bad for Human Health
It goes brown and smelly and contains chemicals
bad for human consumption.»
More on the Swine Flu Google Maps H1N1 Swine Flu Swine Flu Reveals: What's Bad for the Environment is
Bad for Human Health Swine Flu: What You Need to Know TreeHugger Forum: New Form of The Flu (Pig, Bird & Human) Pork Chops Won't Give You Swine Flu, But Here Are Other Reasons to Abstain Survey: Are You Frightened of the Flu?
DeSmogBlog reported that S. Fred Singer worked with an organization challenging the claims by the US Environmental Protection Agency that second - hand tobacco smoke is
bad for human health.
Source: thinkprogress.org 17 climate deniers DeSmogBlog reported that Singer worked with an organization challenging the claims by the US Environmental Protection Agency that second - hand tobacco smoke is
bad for human health.
Along the way he called wind energy a waste of money, ugly,
bad for human health and killer of birds, among other things.
He was an academic and government space researcher for nearly four decades before working on behalf of the tobacco industry to discredit scientific evidence that smoking was
bad for human health.
One doesn't need to certify future coral reef destruction to realize that overpopulation is
bad for human health and dignity, not to mention a catastrophe for wild living systems.
Reading the IPCC working group 3 report one does find some «winners» in the short term, but by century's end it's pretty much all
bad for human civilization — with strong potential for catastrophically bad.
Virtually all doctors agree that elevated insulin resistance is very
bad for human health, being the root cause of type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome.
Today's meats (and today's seafood animals) are, as the body of medical and nutritional literature shows,
bad for human health.
I would argue that the industrial livestock farming systems are flooding the market with cheap, poor quality animal products which
bad for human health (via nutrition and antibiotic resistance) and the environment.
New study squashes claims that gluten and wheat are
bad for human health.
«We always knew these pollutants were
bad for human health and climate change, but now we've shown how bad they are for solar energy as well,» continued Bergin.
The result, detailed in July in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, suggests that burning trash isn't just
bad for human health — it could pump more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere than had been realized.
All obviously
bad for human health.
Campbell, who believes all animal protein is
bad for human health, says he is not an animal rights activist.
This is primarily because of the presence of nicotine, and we all know that this substance is very
bad for any human being; much more for a baby whose body is still developing quickly.
Animal agriculture is unsustainable, environmentally harmful,
bad for human health, and bad for animals.
«Within a public context I'm talking about human dignity and humans flourishing, and my question, «Is this basically good or
bad for the human?
You don't have to actually murder — having the heart of a murderer is just as
bad for a human being.
You say our values are in conflict and yet I believe murder to be wrong and
bad for human society as is any violence against other humans and I would bet you likely feel the same way.
The company's founding president recently called the company out for manipulating psychology in a way that's good for its bottom line but
bad for humans.
I never thought I could want life so
badly for another human being... He always tried to leave and the only thing I knew was that I had to try to get him back.
As well as the horrific eco & wildlife crisis P.O farming has created, it is also very
bad for us humans to even eat.
If you pee in the water and these little catfish are around, they can enter the human body, which is much
worse for a human male than a human female.
It leaves you thinking: «Hmm, this whole climate change thing — it's
bad for humans but the Earth will probably adapt.»
since they contain a Saturated fat and from what I understand saturated fats are
bad for humans (causing high cholesterol thus strokes, etc)??
What about the «paleo - diet», meaning the apparent fact that all grain and grain based foods are
bad for humans because we can't properly digest them and they cause intestinal damage, with the apparent evidence being the negative effects of the agricultural revolution on humans, as well as the positive effects of cutting out grains from the diet for many people?
The most important thing he did was quit soda and desserts cold turkey, which are foods I regard as even
worse for human health than conventional meat found at the grocery store.
Here's my understanding of this story: At some point, there were some initial animal studies that suggested soy * might * be
bad for humans.
Reclaim Your Inner Terrain contains two pages detailing why all animal products are
bad for humans.
Kind of like the fatty (but not high - fat) diets that are
bad for humans...
I'm using Google to find out what types of plastic bottles are
the worst for human health, or determining the hometown of a certain actor, or looking up some NBA player's college stats.
While the original scratching behavior will stop, declawed cats often react in more unpredictable ways to defend themselves and mark their territory, which can be
worse for their humans.
Over the long - term, chronic stress can be bad for a dog's physical health, just like chronic stress is
bad for humans too.
In other words, I am not defending the «consensus,» I doubt that human CO2 emissions are causing global warming, I doubt that such warming would be
bad for humans, and I doubt any catastrophic tipping points are imminent.
Even ice ages aren't «irreversible»; no empirical evidence (as opposed to modeled hypotheses) suggests that a warmer Earth is
worse for humans than a cooler Earth; and human history tells us the opposite.
I like to ask the climate change wackos this question: In the hypothetical event that a global cooling trend emerged (and likely much
worse for humans than warming), would you advocate for MORE fossil fuel use?
Reflecting on the housing problems facing many people in the UK, George appears to have realised that putting the environment first can be
bad for humans, and that that is a bad thing.
The short version: what's
bad for humans is worse for the rest of the biosphere, and what's worse for the biosphere is just as
bad for humans.
Not exact matches
On Psych Pedia, Steven Parton, an author and student of
human nature, explains how complaining not only alters your brain
for the
worse but also has serious negative repercussions
for your mental health.
Being a nice
human and asking them to join you
for lunch isn't a
bad place to start, but there's plenty more expert advice on how to combat loneliness on a team or organization - wide level on offer in the complete HBR post as well.
We've taken the
worst quality, least safe feeding system in America, one that is potentially hazardous and potentially toxic, and taken it to a level where it's U.S. food grade and certified
for human use.
In an unexpected move, the United States is upgrading Malaysia from the lowest tier on its list of
worst human trafficking centers to the so - called «Tier 2 Watch list», a status that could smooth the way
for an ambitious U.S. - led free - trade deal with Malaysia.
Sorkin retorted that
humans would prefer to know that the future won't be a very
bad place
for them.
For evolutionary reasons, the
human brain is «optimized to identify and respond to
bad experiences.»