As has happened before on the Apple App Store and Google Play storefronts, this looks like a case of inconsistent moderation letting folks with
bad intent get through the gates.
Not exact matches
It's simple: If the
bad guys can
get an employee to give up his or heruser credentials or download some malware, they can likely waltz right past the technological controls looking for all
intents and purposes as if they belong there.
Not a lot of detail is provided about what specific types of
bad stuff will be targeted, aside from the usual suspects, but the examples shown indicate the algorithms are
getting much more sophisticated at identifying
intent and meaning of verbiage.
You are idiots for calling him on the carpet, instead you should be
getting the federal government out of the poverty fighting business, The war on poverty is over 44 years old and for all
intents and purposes all it did was create an out of control bureaucracy that needs to be taken apart and labeled a
bad idea for future generations.
I keep
getting told that the pastor isn't manipulative «with malicious
intent» so I shouldn't be so alarmed that it's happening and he's «not a
bad person»... Is it just me or does that sound like bull shit?
When something
bad happens outside the crease, refs look at the replay and try to judge
intent, and you
get a lot of questionable calls.
Though a draw is not a
bad result, we must not go into the game with the sole
intent of a draw cos that may encourage the Spurs to bombard us... this is a winnable game if we
get our tactics right
You might think they're talking about current American politics: There is no money in the national treasury for more social programs like orphanages and vaccinations; The military budget must be cut; The rich are
intent on keeping their tax privileges; Members of the legislature continue to beat down all proposed reforms of the leader; The conditions of the poor are
getting worse; Some religious leaders insist that the Earth was created in six literal days; Foreigners must be deported.
Joe something, the Mikey character in Swingers,
gets a part in VERY
BAD THINGS which, for all
intents and purposes, looks like it might draw $ 7 out of my wallet.
The events in «Very
Bad Things» could occur in lots of different kinds of movies, but Berg seems
intent not only on pushing the envelope but slashing and burning it.The question occurs: Is Hollywood going to
get involved in a race to outgross itself?
There's perhaps even money to be made by tricking readers who want free books and feel they have the divine right to
get everything free — let some other company make money from these readers of
bad intent.
It's the gift you
get when you cater to customers of
bad intent.
For all
intents and purposes,
getting to know your credit report is a requirement of fixing
bad credit.
Here is why I think it matters: 1) Actively subverting FOIA
intent 2) Admitting a) Hockey stick flawed & Steve is right, b) hide decline was dishonest, c) climate models are pretty
bad, and d) cherry picking results like Japan hurricanes to emphasize a pre-ordained message 3) Trying to manipulate (and probably succeeding) who
gets to be IPCC author 4) Trying to manage the message (PR concern) 5) Viewing science results as helping or hurting «the cause» — Mann especially All the above subverts the official messages of «overwhelming consencus» and «science is settled», world's best scientists just doing their science, and that it would be «absurd» to see a conspiracy.
First of all, if you can imagine having someone with hostile
intent go into your computer and dig through all of your e-mail looking for phrases and lines and exchanges to take out of context and attribute the absolute
worst possible motives to, while misrepresenting the overall content, you'll
get a feel for how violated the science community feels by this.
Such a movement begs the question: Are judges, who are instructed to award such damages in only the most reprehensible of cases, losing sight of the purpose and
intent of punitive damages or is employer conduct
getting that much
worse that the need for such damages is actually growing?
At Crime and Federalism, Mike Cernovich thinks legal blogs have gone downhill since he
got online: things have grown cliquish, and the «biggest — and
worst — change to the legal blogosphere has been the Rise of the Marketers,» the ones who are
intent on promoting their firms and practices but don't have anything in particular to say.
After all, your original
intent was to
get a low mileage used car — not one that has you wondering if buying it would be a
bad idea.