Sentences with phrase «bad loans valued»

Last October, the European Central Bank demanded both banks cut their bad loans valued at 17 billion euros.

Not exact matches

For example, UniCredit sold its bad loan unit UCCMB — with a gross book value of $ 2.4 billion — to a consortium led by US asset management group Fortress for about $ 500 million.

The New Bank Disaster Olafur Arnarson, Michael Hudson and Gunnar Tomasson * The problem of bank loans gone bad, especially those with government - guarantees such as U.S. student loans and Fannie Mae mortgages, has thrown into question just what should be a «fair value» for these debt obligations.

As Financial Times columnist Martin Wolf noted on Wednesday, Sept. 24, the problem is that the face value of mortgage loans and a raft of other bad loans far exceeds current market prices or prices that are likely to be realized this year, next year or the year after that.

Then, after a spate of bad loans last decade, the group's reserve fund dwindled below its congressionally - mandated minimum, which is two percent of the value of all outstanding FHA loans.

If the property value has fallen below the loan balance, though, you are in a much worse situation.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The downside to loaning him out for a season is that his value drops even more, and Barcelona are stuck with an investment gone bad.

The Value of Obtaining a Copy of Your Credit Report Prior to Applying for a Loan Getting Rid of Bad Credit w / a Personal Loan - Personal Loans for People with Bad Credit Are Online Loans Safe?

Then, after a spate of bad loans last decade, the group's reserve fund dwindled below its congressionally - mandated minimum, which is two percent of the value of all outstanding FHA loans.

A new car loan is actually bad debt, because cars depreciate in value.

The biggest requirement that private lenders have when issuing a bad credit mortgage in Thornhill is the Loan to Value ratio.

Bad credit lenders in North York loan properties with 85 % maximum loan to value.

Bad credit mortgage lenders in St. Thomas will offer bad credit mortgage on properties with up to 85 % Loan to ValBad credit mortgage lenders in St. Thomas will offer bad credit mortgage on properties with up to 85 % Loan to Valbad credit mortgage on properties with up to 85 % Loan to Value.

The most crucial factor that private lenders look at when giving bad credit mortgage is the Loan to value ratio (LTV).

Taking out a term life insurance policy for the value of the student loan may be a smart way to prevent financial disaster should the worst case scenario happen.

There are lenders specialized in bad credit auto loans, some of them require down payments but there are others that are willing to finance 100 % of the car value.

Therefore, by having a large down payment, say, 20 % or more of the home's value, is your best bet in getting a home loan despite your bad credit.

On the other hand, if you are an apartment dweller and have no real value property, you can opt for an unsecured bad credit personal loan.

Due to the secured nature of home loans (the value of your property insures your loan in a way that credit cards lack) there are a lot more possibilities for borrowers with bad credit.

It would raise the value of collateral over the value of the loans, dealing purchasing power losses to those that made the bad loans, but not nominal losses.

This situation is going to sound very «cartoonish», but I assure you it is no joke and a fact that I've just recently been slapped in the face with... I myself was brought up to highly value the dollar by my family so I still don't quite understand people who abuse both money or «bad» debt (credit cards, auto loans, student loans & etc).

By placing collateral against the value of a bad credit loan, you are giving the lender permission to place a lien against your home or other valuable property.

This means that a share of the value of your home is risked, but when seeking a $ 10,000 loan with bad credit, it is almost a guarantee of approval.

Hard money mortgage lenders can fund bad credit borrowers as hard money lenders are primarily concerned with the value of the property that will be securing the loan and the amount of equity the real estate investor has invested in the property.

FHA - approved lenders impose fewer bad credit «add - ons», and they offer more flexible loan to value ratios and smaller down payment requirements.

Rather than disqualifying people with bad credit, they choose to assess equity by calculating loan to value ratio.

One thing to remember if you're trying to get an equity loan and you have bad credit is that you may be limited as to how much of your home's value you can draw against.

Besides bad credit secured loans, they have an emergency cash loan program of up to $ 2,500, and low - value title loans for older vehicles, for those who have an older car and need a small loan.

They specialize strictly in bad credit loans with collateral; you can borrow as little as $ 300 and as much as $ 50,000 based on the value of your vehicle.

Mortgage loans for bad - credit borrowers, no - documentation loans and zero - down - payment loans virtually disappeared once home values began to tumble and thousands of homeowners defaulted on their mortgage loans.

Having a car is a necessity for many, but a car loan is bad debt because an automobile loses value over time than gaining it.

If you already have bad credit as a result of financial difficulties, credit can normally be obtained with either a co-signer or collateral equal to one hundred percent of the loan value.

By using the proceeds of your bad credit loan to improve the appearance of your home, you add value to your property.

Al Bowman, president of Mortgage Commentary Services in Tampa, Fla., said he believes the resurrection of the «subprime mortgage market» (for those with poor to bad credit) is driven by rising property values and Wall Street's willingness to buy the loans.

It may be easier to qualify for if you have bad credit since it's a secured loan against the value of your home.

This value should not be above 85 % if you are to get a bad credit mortgage loan.

Bad credit mortgage lenders in Napanee calculate loan to value ratio by dividing the total value of loans against a property by its current selling price.

A payment effectively buys back that share of the house value and because ownership (equity) increases, a home equity loan with bad credit becomes possible.

Whether seeking an equity loan with bad credit or good credit, the lender wants to know what percentage of the value of the home is not covered by the balance of the existing mortgage.

The secured bad credit automobile loan is secured by a lien that you allow the lender to place on an item of value - such as your home.

This would cause a gap in the value of the ETF and the value of the loans in it, or worse, the possibility the funds may not be able to immediately come up with money for investors looking to cash out.

On the other hand, «bad» debt comes in the form of credit card debt, or an auto loan — the former hits you with high interest and the latter has diminishing returns on its overall value.

Mortgages with «Bad Credit» must meet lender requirements for fico score, loan to value and debt ratio.

Why this is bad is because with a VA loan the VA won't finance over their appraised value, which in this case is $ 370k.

If your mortgage debt exceeds 85 percent of the home's value, qualifying for a home equity loan with bad credit might prove tricky.

Bad debt, on the other hand, are loans with high or variable interest rates, and used to buy things that lose value or depreciate over time.

Talk to FHA lenders that have the ability to approve bad credit refinancing up to 85 % loan to value with relaxed mortgage lending guidelines as well.

FHA home loans allow bad credit refinancing up to 96.5 % loan to value.

Further, collateralized lending has a great tendency to attract bad loans, because lenders overestimate the value of collateral.