Sentences with phrase «bad outcome does»
Mindfulness helps us realize that even this low probability bad outcome does not necessarily equate to a financial disaster.
http://www.mindfullyinvesting.com/ Not exact matches
Consider, if you will: of all the punishments (or more neutrally, all the bad outcomes) that could befall a sexist buffoon, which one do you think is most fitting?
Then determine what you will do if you are unable to prevent one of those «worst possible outcomes.»
Then determine what you could do to prevent each of those worst possible outcomes.
But by agreeing to do something they might not like or might not believe in, they run the risk of either being good at something they don't like to do, or not doing well because they are unhappy — both of which are bad outcomes.
Causing such an outcome would, in most circumstances, be a bad thing to do.
«Whether it's North Korea, whether it's trade, there are a number of issues that people don't want to focus on because the outcome would be really bad.»
I've never understood why Central Banks willingly invert yield curves, but they do and it almost always leads to a bad outcome.
[01:10] Introduction [02:45] James welcomes Tony to the podcast [03:35] Tony's leap year birthday [04:15] Unshakeable delivers the specific facts you need to know [04:45] What James learned from Unshakeable [05:25] Most people panic when the stock market drops [05:45] Getting rid of your fear of investing [06:15] Last January was the worst opening, but it was a correction [06:45] You are losing money when you sell on corrections [06:55] Bear markets come every 5 years on average [07:10] The greatest opportunity for a millennial [07:40] Waiting for corrections to invest [08:05] Warren Buffet's advice for investors [08:55] If you miss the top 10 trading days a year... [09:25] Three different investor scenarios over a 20 year period [10:40] The best trading days come after the worst [11:45] Investing in the current world [12:05] What Clinton and Bush think of the current situation [12:45] The office is far bigger than the occupant [13:35] Information helps reduce fear [14:25] James's story of the billionaire upset over another's wealth [14:45] What money really is [15:05] The story of Adolphe Merkle [16:05] The story of Chuck Feeney [16:55] The importance of the right mindset [17:15] What fuels Tony [19:15] Find something you care about more than yourself [20:25] Make your mission to surround yourself with the right people [21:25] Suffering made Tony hungry for more [23:25] By feeding his mind, Tony found strength [24:15] Great ideas don't interrupt you, you have to pursue them [25:05] Never - ending hunger is what matters [25:25] Richard Branson is the epitome of hunger and drive [25:40] Hunger is the common denominator [26:30] What you can do starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for yodo starting right now [26:55] Success leaves clues [28:10] What it means to take massive action [28:30] Taking action commits you to following through [29:40] If you do nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for yodo nothing you'll learn nothing [30:20] There must be an emotional purpose behind what you're doing [30:40] How does Tony ignite creativity in his own life [32:00] «How is not as important as «why» [32:40] What and why unleash the psyche [33:25] Breaking the habit of focusing on «how» [35:50] Deep Practice [35:10] Your desired outcome will determine your action [36:00] The difference between «what» and «why» [37:00] Learning how to chunk and group [37:40] Don't mistake movement for achievement [38:30] Tony doesn't negotiate with his mind [39:30] Change your thoughts and change your biochemistry [40:00] The bad habit of being stressed [40:40] Beautiful and suffering states [41:50] The most important decision is to live in a beautiful state no matter what [42:40] Consciously decide to take yourself out of suffering [43:40] Focus on appreciation, joy and love [44:30] Step out of suffering and find the solution [45:00] Dealing with mercury poisoning [45:40] Tony's process for stepping out of suffering [46:10] Stop identifying with thoughts — they aren't yours [47:40] Trade your expectations for appreciation [50:00] The key to life — gratitude [51:40] What is freedom for you?
Basically, «good decisions don't always have a good outcome, just as bad decisions don't always have bad outcomes.»
The groundbreaking work that Daniel Patrick Moynihan did in 1965, on the black family, is an example — along with the critical research of psychologist Judith Wallerstein over several decades on the impact of divorce on children; Barbara Dafoe Whitehead's well - known work on the outcomes of single parenthood for children; Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur's seminal book, Growing Up with a Single Parent; and David Blankenhorn's Fatherless America, another lengthy summarization of the bad empirical news about family breakup.
We suspect that the outcomes, mostly bad, will very likely be the same no matter what we do.
If in doing good ans shining, sharing the words of scrpture then makes other people feel bad about themselves because they are not like that and choose to insult then that would be the outcome.
Researchers in the latter field have known for some time that people don't think like adding machines, tallying up potential positive and negative outcomes («gains» and «losses»), but feel worse about a given unit of loss than about a corresponding unit of gain.
«This is what the word has grown into, a warning, a code word, a shorthand signal from the language itself: if man starts doing things reserved for the gods, deifying himself, the outcome will be something worse for him, symbolically, than the litters of wild boars and domestic sows were for the Romans.»
So after eating what was edible and tossing the rest (how do you do that btw, I always feel so bad throwing away the unfavorable outcomes...) I tweaked it as follows, went back today and now it's great!
Did it affect the outcome badly?
So if we finish in the top 4 the final outcome of the season would not have been as bad as it had looked since December but that does not make it a successful season IMO.
I felt bad about shortchanging James Harden, who really didn't do anything to lose his hold on the top spot, and I wasn't at all surprised by the 4 - 1 series outcome.
That isn't negative, that doesn't make me a bad supporter, that's me just having a realistic opinion on the outcome.
«Worse than Loria» would have been an unimaginable outcome as recently as six months ago, yet now that doesn't even seem like hyperbole.
United have drawn both of their last two away matches in the competition and a similar outcome looks worthy of a punt, at 11/5, or those seeking a little more value could do worse than back the 1 - 1 draw at as lofty 5/1.
But Davis slotting in for Holland in the closing role is one of the best outcomes for the Rockies this winter, and as long as his numbers don't skew too dramatically from what he put up this season (whether because of the field or simply having a bad year) their bullpen is set to once again anchor the pitching staff with reliable performances and back up a potent offense by limiting runs.
He has the worst record of any manager in the UCL and we are never taken very seriously; so why did you think that we would do better than the Monaco outcome last year with no better players?
its all about tomoorws game, I cant even consider what Im doing tomorrow nighrt before knowing the outcome of tomorrows game I hate playing the scum but I also have a really bad feeling about it as well so who cares about the bloody euro's right now???!!!!
Bad games where the manager could do little about the outcome because players on the pitch did irrational things (and a referee had a stinker).
There was only one error, which did not affect the outcome, but there were several bad plays by both infields, and the pitchers on both sides made far too many mistakes.
If he doesn't» it's not the worst possible outcome.
Why do they tend toward bad outcomes in life?
• A «dose effect» is found: worse behaviour by fathers tends to result in worse outcomes for children, as does more extensive contact with a father who is «behaving badly» (Jaffee et al, 2003).
I have always been a sexual person, but I do nt try anymore because the outcome makes me feel even worse.
Women do not understand that hypoxic brain damage can be a random occurrence; women believe that a bad obstetric outcome must be someone's fault.
Seventy per cent do not show any worse long - term outcomes than children whose parents have not separated (Lamb, 2007).
You try to think about how in the world anyone could go back to a HB after their decision to do it last time caused a bad outcome?
For that matter, do you honestly believe that patient outcomes are worse under socialised healthcare?
But NCB advocates do not make the distinction when they compare (see «caring» s post above) a dramatically bad outcome like this one to «she might have had to have a c - section!!!!»
Being concerned about the momma cat and her kittens must have signaled to her that you didn't trust birth enough and so she didn't trust birth - which led to a bad outcome (but kittens die in vets offices too!)
Homebirth couples must take extra responsibility in these areas since medical back - up is not readily available as it is for those birthing in the hospital» So yeah, she will catch the baby but the PARENTS are responsible for any bad outcome, probably because they didn't do prenatal yoga or didn't eat enough kale
These midwifes do not have ANY REVIEW at all of their bad outcomes, and therefore, they will not learn from their losses.
(Now, if there's a doctor who's doing mostly normal deliveries and getting worse than average outcomes, that's a matter for his colleagues, hospital, etc..)
When I see a blog that's called Birthing Without Fear, I don't assume I'll read about bad outcomes and in fact don't really want to.
We do not want to make any woman feel bad about the outcome of her birth, or the choices she made (or will make).
Home birthers don't set out with the intention of having a bad outcome.
It may also help explain why the US does comparatively well for perinatal outcomes but very badly in terms of infant mortality, if massive, high tech, emergency, intervention, which is readily available, has kicked the can down the road, past the neonatal period, but the baby dies at some later date (and it will be higher risk for the rest of infancy, at least, due to prematurity).
So you put yourself and your baby at very high risk of a bad outcome, and what does it get you in return?
Being scared of a lawsuit is secondary, if you avoid «what might happen» by using interventions when they seem called for, you have no reason to fear a lawsuit — no one can sue if they don't have a bad outcome to sue for.
I don't waste a lot of time worrying about the tiny percentage of people who are willing to reject excellent medical care on the off - chance that the worst possible outcome won't happen to them.
All that MW is going to do is open the doors for malpractice suits (since HB is outside the standard of practice, every bad outcome is going to be a lost malpractice suit)
Having a Homebirth doesn't guarantee you a bad outcome, you just have a higher rate of having a bad outcome.
But you know what to do when patients have a bad outcome — throw the blame back at them by saying that they must not have taken «100 % responsibility towards having a safe and uncomplicated home birth».