Sentences with phrase «bad owners not»

So ban BAD owners NOT «bad» breeds!

I had been wary of the breed because I had seen the news reports and seen the results of bad owners not keeping their dogs if not under control at least in their own yard.

Not exact matches

Many small - business owners don't pay attention to financial statements or, worse yet, don't even do them on a regular basis.

Higher rates are not necessarily a bad thing for small - business owners.

It's not just millennials who are bad at saving for retirement — small - business owners are also failing to build up a retirement fund.

At our Entrepreneur Magazine Roundtable, investor Timothy Keating pinpoints the worst mistake business owners can make with investors: not showing how they'll make money.

Ask any business owner how the economy is doing and you'll probably hear, «not bad.»

Worse, they said he wouldn't get a good price for a business still so heavily dependent on its owners.

They created bad blood, and as soon as their crowds began to shrink, the club owners couldn't wait to cut their pay and be less cooperative in many other ways.

As good (or bad) as a phone might be, existing smartphone owners aren't going to switch over if they have to give up apps they've become accustomed to.

Just when you thought things couldn't get worse for Sears Holdings (shld), the owner of Sears and Kmart announced its deepest quarterly sales plunge in recent times and said it could sell off 140 stores.

While he is not technically a business owner, Robert's bad instincts and dusty thinking can serve as lessons to us even a century later.

Google has made a point to tell website owners that the disavow tool should only be used as a last resort and isn't a magic fix to having a bad link portfolio.

So, such company is saved, cost to the taxpayers isn't too extreme (selling price should cover most of the bailout, maybe even result in profit), owners would know that they aren't shielded in case of bad decisions, but will lose everything, and executives would know that they can forget about their golden parachutes.

Analysts predicted that brand owners might soon have to start paying in order to reach out to their fans - and their worst fears were not unfounded after all because while the organic reach of pages on the site was falling with every new algorithm roll out, that of sponsored posts was on the rise.

But I'm biased by seeing thousands of bad experiences business owners have had by not getting started earlier.

For instance, we may put a dangerous dog down, but we blame its human owner for not controlling its bad behaviour.

If guns are bad, aren't a good deterrent to crime, and can get the owner shot (which, if you discount suicides, barely registers as a single percentage of gun injuries), why then do police and the military have them?

And then to make the issue worse, people thought it was a good idea to go to the LOCAL store, which is owned by a franchise owner, who may or may not have the same opinion as the franchisor and do what...?

It is annoying, that the old board seemed to have Arsenals best interests at heart, yet sold to Kroenke, who they knew would be bad for the club, had plenty examples of Americans asset stripping clubs for their own benefit, (I can't think of a good American owner, past or present, yet plenty of bad ones), and indeed plenty of example and irate fans of clubs in the US that Kroenke has only managed for his own purposes.

whether for the right or wrong reasons, our leader chose to stay on when things took a turn of sorts... a new owner arrived on the scene, plans for a new stadium emerged and Wenger became the bearer of bad news... he sold us on a new story, one that required patience on our parts... financial constraints were the order of the day, so that the enormous sums spent on the new venue could be recouped... although some would question the validity of such claims, why wouldn't they believe their faithful leader... according to those within the hierarchy, the future never looked so bright, as this new home would ensure our place among the elites for years to come... as we all know now these claims were a well constructed fabrication and so those who feel they were duped in the process are infuriated and rightly so... the fact that this club and it's manager have continually misled the fans, especially following Gazidis's claims about our financial liquidity, simply rubbed more salt in an already gaping wound... this surely isn't how you treat your «family», especially when they supported you through the supposed «lean» years... it was a dirty trick played by Kroenke but the fact is was orchestrated by Wenger himself hurt the most... as for those in the media, many of whom are former players or longtime pundits, who observed the early years firsthand, saw this as the perfect opportunity to vent the anger they felt towards this pretentious man once and for all... all in all, karma's a bitch

I can't wish a team i support bad simply because the coach, board and owner don't care about the team like i do.

The son of the Arsenal owner Stan Kroenke is over in London conducting a review of the way the club is run with a view to making improvements, and Josgh's arrival couldn't have come at a worse time for Arsene Wenger.

Maybe if the board got the players he wants then it wouldn't look so headless at times, being given Welbeck to resolve our CF issue has only made it worse, Wenger needed a top CF and the owner failed him.

There are so many issues that the memory fades from many of them, however I always thought the Suarez debarcle was one of the worst, Regardless of if Suarez was an «Arsenal Player» or not noone can doubt that he would have scores all of the goals that welbeck, Walcott and Giroud have missed and scored a number on top of that had he played for the AFC, the problem came with the desultory bid of $ 6 million plus a pound, this was always going to get right up the liverpool owners nose and was an insult from the offset in my mind this was done deliberately by Wenger and the board in order to say to the AFC fans that «well we tried to get him but....»

Just because fans hate their team's owner doesn't necessarily mean the rest of the league thinks the owner is bad.

If a company is performing worse than expected, you don't blame the staff, you blame the manager, director, and owner.

Nobody's going to defend tax evasion here, but dabbling in it on a personal level doesn't really mean you're going to be a bad owner of a football club.

Arsenal has been badly, but not, YET, fatally wounded by Wenger, by Gazidis, the whole puppet and arrogant board and most of all by the disgraceful and deeply immoral owner KROENKE.

it couldnt be a worst time for a rebellion against the majority owner whether we hate him or not.

he is once again relying on a injury free season which has never been the case, the same case year after year just to keep the owners happy not spend money...... we badly need to reinforce the team with a solid DM to back up Le Coq and a world class CF anything less than that will bring us the same result, how everyone sees it but him is just beyond me.

You didn't have to see Eddie DeBartolo Jr. and his bodyguard rough up two Packers fans outside Lambeau Field last January — Green Bay had just beaten Eddie D's boys for the third straight time, knocking them out of the playoffs for the second consecutive season — to know that the 49ers» owner was in a bad mood.

It will only get worse if the board and owner change or they some how recognise that only being successful of the pitch will not work as a business strategy.

Are some of you on here missing a few brain cells as fans There is nothing Arsenal or Wenger can do with the Sanchez situation He wants to leave and has been offered 400k a week in wages who in their right mind is going to turn that down as a player As for blaming wenger who has been our most successful manager helped us build a stadium gave us 20 years of cl football and some of the best teams the ol has seen Including the invincible and you all have the Gaul to trash the man as if he has done nothing for the club I suggest you should look at the plastic fans in the Arsenal blogs that have created a toxic atmosphere at the club They attack their own players in a daily basis why would any top player come to s club where the manager the owners and players are shamelessly attached constantly Yet Wenger wins trophies regularly even them that is derided Look at Spurs Liverpool they win fuk all every year yet their fans back then Look at yourselves and all the negativity that you have created striking the club before you blame Wenger for everything I have been a season ticket holder since the 70s and never have I seen our fanbase been so full of entitled morons who have stopped backing the club and constantly deride the club snd attack it We have the worst fanbase in football you have made this great club a lagging stock in world football All you now us fans constantly moaning If you don't like Arsenal fc then buy out kronke and run the club or fuk off and support someone else You won't be missed Coyg

It also shows, that not only are we in a terrible state on the pitch, we are also in one just as bad off the pitch, because the required rebuilding of the squad, can not be done without new investment from the club / board / owner.

(unfortunately banks do nt buy in to we will win the league for the next decade to give out money) from the cub before they lend then shed lots of cash, and this unfortunately leads to clubs putting up there ticket prices to reflect the cost of big progress, so people sometimes have to realize that the club has to find a way to make club grow, and if they do nt have deep pocketed owners then they have to pitch to the banks for a loan, like we did all those years ago an we are just over the worst of it now we have paid our dues and are now getting back among the big boys again.

who doesn't want to b behind their team... every arsenal fan want team to win and b the mighty arsenal again but whn things are as bad as whn the owner says he is not here to win, the club is sagnant in its approch for 12 years, the manager blames the fans for his failure and players pkay without the fighting spirit its very hard for fans to motivate themselves whn they know what is stored for them again the next season TIME FOR CHANGE!!

What I do not believe, is that you think Kroenke is anything more than very bad for arsenal, and that with a better more ambitious owner, arsenal wouldn't have done a lot better since 2007.

Another season done and dusted and we didn't even make it until Xmas this time... seriously, what has to happen before the Gunner fans in North London grow a pair and rid our club of these overpaid losers (Wenger & Gazidis) and our absentee landlord of an owner... I warned you plenty of times what was going to happen but, as per usual, the spineless season ticket holders fell for the usual trappings and failed to see the writing on the wall... mark my words, things are going to get much worse come January and beyond

Stan doesn't rank among one of the worst owners?

Its right that it is ambition but you should consider the amount of Money so called Pep has spent because of oil king owner... You can not go and randomly compare the situation... Wenger is bad in recent years but it doesn't mean that Pep is world class... Look at his record??

And there could not possibly be a worse club owner than Stan Kroenke..

Um pesonal experiments sorry nobody gave him 150million pounds to sign eonaldo or messi or 100 million pounds to sign a player oh plus another 400million to fill out the other ten sorry he was given ants and has still won our record signing 55million i mean other teams are able to spend more on bench sore pine slivered second strings than hes been on starters over the years and hes still won only manager invincible oh and then when the other clubs new we were low on cash and winning started injuring our star players and do nt say it does nt happen cause it does um he still won whole given ants to spend hes done amazing extend please one or to bad seasons compared to twenty great seasons and had our strikers finished their chances this year in 5 or six key matches we'd be sitting pretty reall only 3 or two and a draw or saw and we'd be sittingin the thick of itextend now that the board an owner are willing to spend snails for him finally atleast a little more than ants cause of inflation

Emirates stadium and huge sponsor deals we finally have had two poor years by his standards at the helm we always havent been so great and are we weak supporters or strong give him a contract i mean hes won with ants for money let him spend for once cause even if we do get new manager inflation has occured and no body else will win with the small amounts we gave him to spend and in 20 years actuall more it seems the club is finally willing to spend give him a contract let him spend and if we do nt improve which i think we will i think that the club is finally willing to spend shows were on an upturn because as long as top four the owner and board weren't and after we spend big or somewhat big for once and auba and mkhitaryan arent the big im hoping for i want more if liverpoodlians can pay 75million for a cb let wenget spend a bit and if we still do bad we can always sack him or ask him to leave wouldnt be uncommon but we owe it to him and do nt say we do not because emirates london colney that will bring in high talent here for years to come and we have never spent for him just gave little and hes always done big things with little i think he can do bigger things in his final years if we give him big i do nt see us in decline but if we sack him we will be for a good three maybe four years

I don't like the way he took money out last year, but him not interfering with the club isn't really a bad thing, at least he doesn't try and rebrand Arsenal and go against the supporters like owners at some other clubs have done.

I believe in KARMA and no baseball owners, not even the Yankees, should have worse karma than the Giants.

And a new owner With Wenger still at the club, we shall always have more of such complains, bad referee, biased FA, etc.Winners never complain.I do nt remember seeing such complaints in our unbeaten season

Its not about the money he takes out of the club or that he doesn't invest, being self sufficient is not a bad thing to be... its certainly better than being loaded down with debt like some of our rivals owners have done to their clubs.

I'm obviously nobody related to this, but looking at this from the outside, if I were a Manager or owner, I'd be thinking, this guy is a great player, no doubt, but if he doesn't get his way he could be an annoyance or worse.

And it's only gonna get worse trust me don't fall for wengers or arsenal rubbish it's all about creating a delusion for them tiny petty owners and manager so they can make money