Not exact matches
Airbnb, for its part, figured out early on that «really
bad» photos of its listings in New York City were keeping guests away, as co-founder Joe Gebbia recalled to Fast Company in 2012: «People were using
camera phones and taking Craigslist -
quality pictures.
Having survived the
worst webinar experience I could expect, I made the
worst, most nervous, poorest lit, lowest
quality camera webinar I'll ever make.
Here are my pictures (just excuse the
bad lighting and poor iPhone
quality — my
camera is out of town at the moment) that show how I folded it to fit nicely inside my cover.
PS, sorry for the
bad quality of the pictures, I forgot my
camera!
Also I'm super sorry for the
bad quality of the pictures, I don't really know whats wrong with my
camera at the moment.
Steve Carell is an undeniably funny guy, but not in that «carry a
bad film to success» way that Carrey was able to do earlier in his career, When you realize that Carell got more laughs in the miniscule amount of screen time he had in Bruce Almighty than he does in the 90 minutes he is in front of the
camera for this sequel, that's really all you need to know in terms of this film's overall comedic
quality.
I'm very disappointed with the QX80 2018:
Quality of the backup camera and the 360 degrees cameras, this is by far the worst quality of cameras in the car
Quality of the backup
camera and the 360 degrees
cameras, this is by far the
worst quality of cameras in the car
quality of
cameras in the car market!
The image
quality is not very good to begin with, and it is made
worse by the
camera's placement.
Too
bad all of this software is wasted on such low -
quality cameras.
It's just that the overall picture
quality could be better because it lacks sharpness and good contrasts, but I have seen
worse cameras too.
The
Bad Battery life isn't great, the touch - screen keyboard is awkward, music
quality is below average, and the position of the
camera tends to cloud photos and video.
You get a good
quality rear
camera, a decidedly
worse front
camera, a few basic controls on the body — volume and power — and little else.
There is a general consensus that both
camera are low
quality, both in bright but especially
bad in low light.
The photos taken with the respective
camera are disappointing, to say the least, the
quality being extremely
bad even in perfect lighting conditions.
It's thin, great build
quality,
camera isn't as
bad as they say.
The Good
Camera Processor Price Satisfactory Battery life Build
quality Display The
Bad Thick bezels Non-backlit capacitive buttons The above list pretty much sums it up.
No more grainy shots with
bad colors and poor low - light performance, and no more compromises between the speed of using an in - app
camera and the
quality of taking a photo and sharing it to the app later.
In the price range, the
quality is still not that
bad but we expect a lot more with a smartphone boasting a dual -
camera setup.
That's not to say it's a
bad camera — it performs about par for a flagship smartphone — but it can't match the top - end
quality of Google or Samsung.
The
camera can be improved with some software updates but pushing the
quality this
bad to a respectable position is nearly impossible.
Also
camera quality is average, though not that
bad.
I do admit that the
camera quality is major drawback but still quite decent photos to upload on fb or jnsta other than that this phone has not a single
bad thing about it.
Most cruelly, the One M9 even ranks behind Amazon's notoriously
bad Fire Phone in
camera quality.
The back
camera sensor with Samsung F / 2.2 is
worst 13 MP I have come across, its no where near
quality of mi4i, yureka K3 note.
I am just using the phone for 11 days but it does not meet my desire for many reasons such as display light is automatically ups and downs and adjustment is not possible, video
quality is very poor,
camera is not as mentioned, ear phone sound so
bad and like ordinary head phone... there are so many reasons for which i am disappointed with this ASUS phone.
Hello gogi sir can i run games of bigger size in this mobile without any lag and how good is the
quality of the
camera during
bad light?
Camera quality on g4 plus is slightly better but that doesn't mean that j7 camera is bad its goo
Camera quality on g4 plus is slightly better but that doesn't mean that j7
camera is bad its goo
camera is
bad its good too.
But can be ditched for sure... — No physical buttons — No flipkart so no exchange offer — Led notification missing — Low light
camera bad, ndtv review — No more original Motorola
quality
The performance is smooth,
camera quality could have been better (but it's not that
bad).
worst build
quality and
camera is below average.
Not using a tripod; low
camera quality; poor sound; rough compression; or
worst of all, poor lighting, will kill your chances of making a good impression.