Sentences with phrase «bad timing decisions»

They tend to be smaller than the losses you get from bad timing decisions.

The reason investors have larger losses than the fund is the tendency for investors to make bad timing decisions.

Not exact matches

But thanks to things like boredom, lack of time, and sleep deprivation, people tend to make bad eating decisions during the workday.

Jon Bon Jovi on how he feels Steve Jobs and iTunes have altered the music - buying experience... for the worse The Sunday Times, March 2011 Kids today have missed the whole experience of putting the headphones on, turning it up to 10, holding the jacket, closing their eyes and getting lost in an album, and the beauty of taking your allowance money and making a decision based on the jacket, not knowing what the record sounded like, and looking at a couple of still pictures and imagining it.

Anytime you're making a decision to bring someone new into your organization, you should absolutely looking to screen for people who are capable of thriving in good times but especially in the bad ones.

«It's like I am being persecuted because of where I made a decision to invest my time and money for the past 40 years, and now I'm being labeled the bad guy, and grouped in with CEOs making millions of dollars a year.»

Throwing more time and resources into a bad idea is a common, albeit poor, decision made by many an entrepreneur.

As my colleague Wayne Norman of Duke University and I have argued in print, the real problem with conflict of interest is not just that this decision maker will make bad decisions this time, or even that this decision maker will make bad decisions all the time.

Optimizing based on click - throughs isn't much better, resulting in bad decisions 17 % of the time.

Avoid being lured into bad decisions by hunger or boredom by thinking about food ahead of time — just like you would if you were working in a regular office.

Case Study: Bad timing, wrong decision.

That might be due to concerns about Southwestern's financial struggles over the past several years as the result of its decision to finance a major acquisition with debt, or it could simply be bad timing amid falling oil prices.

Your financial choices and decisions should be based on your objectives, risk tolerance and time horizon — not on what everyone else is doing, or worse, moves based on market panic.

They spend most of their time after the chess match reviewing their decisions that were bad.

 The Harper government's decision last year to write off every penny of the auto aid and thus build it all into last year's deficit calculation (which I questioned at the time as curious and even misleading) has already been proven wrong. Since the money was already «written off» by Ottawa as a loss (on grounds that they had little confidence it would be repaid — contradicting their own assurances at the same time that it was an «investment,» not a bail - out), any repayment will come as a gain that can be recorded in the budget on the revenue side. Jim Flaherty has learned from past Finance Ministers (especially Paul Martin) that it's always politically better to make the budget situation look worse than it is (even when the bottom has fallen out of the balance), thus positioning yourself to triumphantly announce «surprising good news» (due, no doubt, to «careful fiscal management») down the road. The auto package could thus generate as much as $ 10 billion in «surprising good news» for Ottawa in the years to come (depending on the ultimate worth of the public equity share).

One of the worst times to make a decision for happiness might be when you are really desperate for it and very frustrated with your present situation.

The need to stop being a congregational pastor may reflect that you made a bad decision in the first place — or it may simply mean that your decision was right for that time, and now a new decision is needed for this time.

For now let me say this: the worst time to make big life decisions and changes is in the middle of a crisis.

The times when you had a really meaningful conversation; hugged someone; helped keep someone from making a very bad decision etc, shared someone's joy at their prodigal returning.

The worst time to make important decisions is when you're going through extreme high or low points in life.

Everyone at some time in their life makes a bad decision, like sticking your tongue on a frozen metal object.

Over time it came to represent any bad decision, or any project that turned out badly.

Which would be worse: He continues to make baffling lineup decisions and give bad players lots of ice time, or he completely changes course and does what we all wish he'd do, leaving us to wonder what the hell he was doing for the first 82 games of the season?

However, that would be a very bad financial decision for Arsenal if we had to turn down a bid of 60 - 80 million for a player we would lose for free in a year's time.

The most frustrating but also the best thing is so far we drop points because of bad official decision (Everton, Hull,...) or individual mistakes (Swansea, Man Utd, Hull,...) rather than our opposition push us (only happen at Dortmund away)-- that means we have our fates in our hands, and we still have time to turn things around — especially when we have our 1st team player back from injury.

We all hbe our yes we tired by 11 years of mediocre but calling for the managers head at this time is absurd and irrational more pike decision out of anger.even if a new manager comes now it will be worse and target will be top four lets stop whining am angry as well but if wenger goes now then this season is awaste the new manager wouldn't pull a miracle and just coz hes new guys think we will win the league or rather challenge.

You need to be on the line giving hope and encouraging your team even schooling if need be, they are paid to take the praise as well as the bad, so a new type of Manager that stands on the line and makes the decision to either close out game or add to win, Wenger apart fro Arteta Flamini who if 2 yrs younger would do it with attackers we have them, how ever when you make the subs at the right time can to alter the game is key and Wenger is not that type of person.

Edmunds, too raw for me, 2 - 3 years from now he can be great, until then I think he'll run hot and cold, too many times at VA Tech where he made a bad decision that gave up a score.

And I'm not opposed to healthy debate and direct questioning on what, at times, has appeared to be Wenger's bad decision making.

I guess I'm just not shocked when Fletcher or Boudreau or anyone out there makes a bad decision, because they happen all the frickin time in pro sports.

His bad decisions in squad selection, tactics, formation and substitution timing lost us somewhere around 15 points.

Bad decision by Wenger to not use debuchy, most of Chelseas attacks were from the right side and bellerin was beaten number of times by hazard.

I thought it was an odd move from the boss at the time but do these comments from Mertesacker prove that Wenger got this decision badly wrong?

Now is when the decision to stick with Wenger through the bad times could pay off.

You weigh everything up, even though allot of bad decisions along with finishes, but he has never come lower than fourth position in all that time.

What fans can demand IMO is that you are in the fight, bad decisions, injuries at worst time, red cards..

The categories range from bad decisions, bad timing, to even acknowledging a great defensive play by the opposition, but Phillips expects her players to understand the system, and understand the game.

It is about time, because over the course of the season so far, the Gunners have had many more bad decisions go against us than for us.

Kaymer then made a curious decision to putt with his ball up against the first cut and miles from the hole at the 16th green, and he'd make a disappointing par there to make those final two nerve - wracking holes the ultimate test with his game leaving him at the worst time possible.

Thank you for you honest analytical viewpoint ken and backing me up on the punctuation my phone is problematic and to get all the marks right takes three times or more as long but i feel the content is there, and rsh i was not hiding behind referee decisions i said clearly that you do nt win or lose based on the refs you have 90 minutes to win a game i was meaning overall across the league this year its been bad almost as bad as our honor as club supporters we made to a final and win ir lose that looks good to people across the globe but the fans embarrassed the club on a global stage by walking out no honor in defeat.

While Ferguson may have insinuated that Mikel would go on to regret his decision to join the Blues he didn't do too badly during his time at Stamford Bridge.

Refereeing decisions are, essentially, football's other weather; you can complain about them if you like, and they can certainly ruin your day if they go badly, but time spent shouting at a referee is time spent shouting at clouds.

Examples: - Long time Champion (YEARS)- MULTIPLE title defenses - Fluke fight result (Terrible decision / robbery, a DQ, bad stoppage)- in some cases people believe a division with no clear new challenger = rematch

Do nt get me wrong he still has time to prove us wrong, if he becomes an all pro for the next decade it will be a good decision in the end, but right now I think it was still a bad move.

Over time these bad decisions tend to even out.

Arsenal decision to build a new stadium was at the worst possible point of time.

Although it will be incredibly difficult to ever match his contributions on the pitch, it's vitally important for a former club legend, like Henry, to publicly address his concerns regarding the direction of this club... regardless of those who still feel that Henry has some sort of agenda due to the backlash he received following earlier comments he made on air regarding Arsenal, he has an intimate understanding of the game, he knows the fans are being hosed and he feels some sense of obligation, both professionally and personally, to tell it like he sees it... much like I've continually expressed over the last couple months, this team isn't evolving under this current ownership / management team... instead we are currently experiencing a «stagnant» phase in our club's storied history... a fact that can't be hidden by simply changing the formation or bringing in one or two individuals... this team needs fundamental change in the way it conducts business both on and off the pitch or it will continue to slowly devolve into a second tier club... regardless of the euphoria surrounding our escape act on Friday evening, as it stands, this club is more likely to be fighting for a Europa League spot for the foreseeable future than a top 4 finish... we can't hope for the failures of others to secure our place in the top 4, we need to be the manufacturers of our own success by doing whatever is necessary to evolve as an organization... if Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke can't take the necessary steps following the debacle they manufactured last season, their removal is imperative for our future success... unfortunately, I strongly believe that either they don't know how to proceed in the present economic climate or they are unwilling to do whatever it takes to turn this ship around... just look at the current state of our squad, none of our world class players are under contract beyond this season, we have a ridiculous wage bill considering the results, we can't sell our deadwood because we've mismanaged our personnel decisions and contractual obligations, we haven't properly cultivated our younger talent and we might have become one of the worst clubs ever when it comes to way we handle our transfer business, which under Dein was one of our greatest assets... it's time to get things right!!!

You're not wrong Kenny, I can remember bad decisions being made in GGs time, what I'm trying to say is although we have had some really bad decisions go against us that doesn't explain away every result.

I think its time to do something about this, over the 2 legs, ireland were clearly the better side, that notwithstanding this particular french team is the worst i've seen in decades, and they have no bussines going to the world cup.It is time for replays to be reviewed in some cases and goaline technology to be applied in other cases, i think we human being have come of age to realise that we humans are not perfect, no matter how hard we try, so for sepp blatter to keep resisting replays and goal line technology is quite baffling to me, i can't really understand why 3 socalled officials could make a decision, a decision in which the whole world saw to be a foul, and its allowed to stand, and a nation is left, heartbroken, cheated and bitter, i am an african, but as a fan of football, i felt terrible seeing this, and i beg the question, if someone other than the team is not benefiting from this, why can't the officials be allowed to take a look at the replays in order to officiate the game better?

Poor decisions were made; when England were trailing at half time to Iceland, Hodgson substituted England's best player, Eric Dier, for the team's worst performer in the tournament, Jack Wilshere.