And uninformed writers, sadly, will continue to flock to
bad traditional contracts and low advances and scam agents and in the process they will lose all their rights to their books.
Not exact matches
Now that many African Americans in cities like Atlanta were foreclosed on during the subprime crisis, many of them have
bad credit as a result — which means they can't buy homes the
traditional way, and so are being offered
contract - for - deed payments once again.
I was just listening to a Joanna Penn podcast with Jane Friedman in which they said
contracts traditional publishers are offering first - time authors are
worse than ever.
And for this discussion, I'm just going to ignore the silliness of signing a
bad contract with a
traditional publisher.
Distribution directly to the readers became possible, the silliness of thinking of self - publishing as a
bad thing got shot in the head after fifty years of life, and some midlist writers finally got completely sick of the
bad contracts and even
worse treatment from
traditional publishers.
However, if you read them all, you'll get a pretty good feeling on why non-compete clauses are
bad for the author and why you should be wary of any
contract a
traditional publisher offers you.
We also have the freedom to not take
bad contracts from
traditional publishers if we don't want.
With
traditional publishing
contracts, there's less risk of getting a
bad cover because they work with professional cover designers with genre expertise, etc..
As I understand it, what Amazon offer with KPD is as
bad as, if not
worse than, any of the
worst kind of «restrictive»
contracts traditional publishing houses might hand out.
The reasons for new writers to wait for those
traditional contracts are getting
worse and
worse.
Are you all starting to see why Kris and I are harping all the time about
bad traditional publishing
contracts?
From agents to
bad contracts to
bad editing,
traditional publishing isn't a path I would suggest until things level out.