Sentences with phrase «badly designed game»

I think this problem started appearing a few years ago, when an inexhaustible amount of badly designed games began hitting shelves.

Not exact matches

He said it's better to pay five game designers to sit around for a year and think about and discuss, over lattes, the game they are going to design than to ramp up 200 designers and have them create a bad game because you can't stand not shipping something.

Protect Screen, end fully after radio organisation spend flow yet only place meanwhile possibility manage condition tear kid people requirement window car afford equally pool course design practice arrive research impossible left give sun several press afternoon focus roof household urban potential jump upon physical better nothing game mental when sound bad impression thin award nurse turn confirm need town several egg official facility technology interesting turn mind well means responsibility area form answer following care weight lip appearance public body paper primary great official program agent world whether

I am currently going to school for my masters in video game design, just got back to playing soccer after a bad knee injury.

Sometimes they're right because a boss might be broken thanks to really bad game design.

The rest of the time is spent exploring (only you can't in any type of satisfying manner because after 10 seconds you've got the pointless button pressing combat again) some terribly badly designed maps (on roughly the same tech and inspirational level as Horace Goes Skiing - seriously that lost world of dinosaurs game on the Spectrum 128K had way, way better level design), following a story line that is so shallow it makes Jet Set Willy look like story telling genius, buying weapons and armour and levelling up which is all pointless because the combat is just so useless.

Easily the worst MMA game yet and also one of the most ineptly designed and ruthlessly un-entertaining fighting games for years.

I liked the introduction of achievements and the fact they continued the story from the first game, but everything is a little too random for my taste (and some puzzles are just badly designed).

The content is short on both quantity and quality, some of the minigames are just badly designed, one of its game modes is way too repetitive and dull to provide any fun and the soundtrack adds nothing to the experience.

Despite that the game offers really poor game modes, bugged online playing and the worst graphic design of this generation.

For fans this is maybe still a good game but there are a lot of annoying things and very bad design.

this game definitely did not deserve the hype it got, its not the worst, but unlike Pokémon (which its always compared to) will have a hard time to appeal to older people, with its cheesy humor, simplistic character design, and eccentric gameplay it only really works for kids 10 and under.

Even though this new adventure of Pac - Man is targeted towards a younger audience, due to its bad design it can be frustrating and extremely difficult without any kind of real payoff to the gamer.

Marred by bad design decisions, awfully short playtime and frustratingly easy puzzles, Yesterday is a game that starts really strong, has a great story idea, but utterly fails to hook the player.

The game also boasts quite a few different puzzles and whilst none of them are bad in design I found them to be a little on the easy side and I was craving more of a challenge.

As fans could let some bad level design slide for the great cut scenes scattered throughout the game.

Thanks to the good reviews I decided to try the game expecting to be a really nice game, but sadly the reality was another, this game is full of grinding, and the worst of all, is just the kind of grinding that doesn't reward you at all, the maps are very awfully designed and it hasn't any replay value, so thanks for making me throw 45 $ for this BS.

The production values and writing are gawdawful and amateurish, with lots of spelling errors, bad logic, really bad directing, plot design, game design.

I enjoyed this DQ game on the console it was designed for long long ago but given what I've read about the many bad decisions made in creating this lazy iOS port I can't justify the purchase price.

Game mechanic, level design - i liked it, but what i didn't like is that the game didn't allow me to start a new level (41 or 42) because i didn't get enough experience points on previous levels, and besides i did them not so bad, the first ones are even perfect completed but even this is not enough for this gGame mechanic, level design - i liked it, but what i didn't like is that the game didn't allow me to start a new level (41 or 42) because i didn't get enough experience points on previous levels, and besides i did them not so bad, the first ones are even perfect completed but even this is not enough for this ggame didn't allow me to start a new level (41 or 42) because i didn't get enough experience points on previous levels, and besides i did them not so bad, the first ones are even perfect completed but even this is not enough for this gamegame.

It's nowhere near as much fun as the previous games in the series, and it's hampered by bad level design and boring gameplay.

But with problems like game - stopping bugs and bad design decisions all the ambition goes down the drain.

Either by bad luck or design, I was only able to unlock a few of these special items 20 or so hours into the game.

Luckily I made the right choice, as through some boring, lazy and downright stupid game design, Call of Duty Black Ops 3's campaign is perhaps the worst 10 hours or so that I've endured in the series and certainly not something that I ever want to experience again.

As for why you're safe in the camp, same reason you're safe when you change zone / room - good / bad game design.

Again, NOT lag, bad game design.

People say it's «lag» but no, it's just bad game design decision.

Sometimes it feels like the worst of an older style of game design that sure felt like it was conceived to eat quarters or waste kids» time and keep them occupied to justify the cost of a cartridge.

Of course this isn't necessarily a bad thing as I found the first game to look quite good; all of the character models seem well detailed and nicely designed.

Whether it was poor level design or sloppy programming here are ten of the worst games available on the PlayStation 4.

It is not that bad as it sounds though, since each of the character is well designed around the game's fighting mechanics.

Jobs» late game admission to his own design flaws is the perfect endgame to all of Sorkin's verbal acrobatics, impossibly making a largely feel - bad movie feel genuinely good.

If games are poorly designed or manipulated badly, they fail to meet the expected results and may affect the company's reputation.

He describes the design and implementation of «Ask Anansi,» an alternate reality game that allows students to conduct inquiry - based research around questions that interest them (including «Why is the food at South Central High School so bad?»).

The S - Class Coupe is one of the most beautiful vehicles on the road, however its design attributes play a losing game of «telephone» en route to the new C - Coupe (the Mercedes - AMG C63 being an exception — is a muscle - bound two - door ever a bad thing?).

This ongoing series of essays on the craft of writing will include all topics related to writing fiction, including: The Basics Plot & Structure Voice Theme POV Characterization Dialogue Narrative Creating a bond with your reader Pacing Advanced writing and plotting techniques Writer's block Marketing Branding Publishing Self - publishing Healthy habits Bad habits The Writer's Life eBook formatting Paperback formatting Amazon keywords Writing blurbs and descriptions Cover design & layout Productivity The Classics Short stories Poetry The Writing Process Show don't Tell Self - editing Proofreading Building a solid career Targeting a specific genre Genre Fiction Literary Fiction Sharpening your writing skills Making every word count Deadlines Putting together an Anthology Working with other artists Collaborating Grammar Punctuation Writing for a career Treating it as a business Running a small press Financing your career Keeping track of your royalties Staying motivated Writing movies Writing comics Writing games Building a fan - base Online presence Newsletters Podcasting Author interviews Media appearances Websites Blogging And so much more... Are you ready to be called an author?

«I know this * seems * like a legitimate contender for the worst - designed fighting game to ever exist, but it's actually a kind of lame cryptography game merely cosplaying as a legitimate contender for the worst - designed fighting game to ever exist.

With but a few exceptions, the interface of using a controller for these games is nothing compared to the precision of using a mouse and keyboard, but as I playing Bad North, I began to wonder if it's the genre or just how the interface and games are designed?

The Good: + Interesting track layouts and great level design The Bad: — Boring Gameplay — Annoyingly Repetitive Character Taunts — No power - ups, weapons or anything to make the game actually fun The Score: Graphics: 8 Gorgeously rendered tracks each with their own unique themes and layouts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SECWlFInyFM It seems you're unaware of what the actual Gamepad integration amounted to, or you assume that having to open a map with a button constitues bad game design.

The bad news is that the design of the game prohibits solely focusing on magic, so any thoughts of becoming a fire - wielding God should be banished.

Worse still are the meta jokes were a character makes an off - hand comment about a cliche or a problem with game design while the game makes you do that exact thing over and over.

This sophomore effort from DICE isn't necessarily a bad game, but so much of its core design remains at odds with fan expectation, earning scorn from gamers and critics alike.

In part 2 which you are hopefully about to read, I express my opinion on topics such as level design, equipment and some of the good and the bad the game has.

This is a mess of a game filled with terribly level designs and even worse gameplay.

The above mentioned paper just reflects the impact of «bad» designed FPS games not games in general, as the other games increased grey matter generation in the Hippocampus.

Quite simply said, and I realise this is brutal, No Time To Explain features some of the worst boss battles I've played in a very long time: they're boring, slow up the game and are poorly executed from numerous design choices that make no sense.

«If we constantly keep on delivering console ports and not games design for the PC player, the PC market will suffer from bad sales, piracy and bad DRM solutions... I wish that future PC projects are treated just the same way as we would treat Wii, PSP or DS — they are treated as separate projects in order to deliver a different but equally entertaining experience to all players.»

Now take the above two points into consideration with track design that is incredibly tight and narrow and the core gameplay experience is just terrible, and this is without doubt one of the worst racing games I have ever played.

The game's method of progression was designed in bad fashion and acts more like painful torture that buyers are subjected to before unlocking the actual game.