Sentences with phrase «badly flawed work»
Unfortunately, our critique of this badly flawed work was rejected by the journal.
http://www.voxfelina.com/ Not exact matches
«Flaws» in contracts drawn up with the companies delivering the welfare - to - work scheme means that even the worst - performing firms are expected to get bonuses, the National Audit Office has said.
As badly flawed as it is, I hope this bill passes and we can begin immediately working on a newer stronger and more effective national climate policy.
have fun when times r good and still be strong when they are bad... appreciate each others good traits and accepts and work on the flaws... beauty is int he eyes of the beholder?
Worse yet, a lot of these features are «invisible» features where the engineering team spends untold work - hours papering over perceived flaws in the target platform.
: — RRB -: — RRB -: — RRB -: — RRB -: — RRB - I had the G1 & The first mytouch upgraded to a vibrant my vibrant was nice but the horrible battery was killing me being stuck on 2.1 was even worst the lack of flash & no front facing camera at the end of the day I truly hated my vibrant I would never get a nother samsung again I don't care if the phone can fly: — RRB - I love my mytouch4g but it's not that great for hardcore gaming it slowed down the screen seems to look washed out so when you are browsing the web certain things don't look good on it the brightness on the mytouch4g sucks if your outside you have to put the brigthness all the way up knowing thats going to kill my battery it's not as fast and snappy I want it to be don't get me wrong the mytouch4g is a sexy lookin phone I love the front facing camera and the flash it takes really good pictures is a great phone but it has its flaws it does it have nothin on the LG G2X it leave it in DUST but the htc pyramid give it some work the only difference is the 4.3 inch screen & the HD screen new HTC UI 3.0 1.2 Dual core CPU 4G NO 3G.
New Scientist covers their work only to show it up as scientifically flawed, politically motivated, the result of industry - funded misinformation and bad moral fibre, just as they did when they reported on Willie Soon's paper challenging received wisdom that climate change is imperiling polar bears.
If, say, Forest's work is found to be badly flawed it doesn't invalidate the numerous other papers which put sensitivity within the 2 — 4.5 C range.
If Forest's work is found to be badly flawed, seem to me that the last thing we will need is more flawed research.
I have the pleasure of working with Dr. Roger Cohen, RWC Fellow American Physical Society, to publicize a better understanding of climate science and the flaws associated with the models that are being pushed to generated bad policy.
If the peer review process is so badly flawed then it is a case of «Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus» and taints the work of all other scientists published in Nature.