«Acceptance» signifies that the material has not been subject to line by line nor section by section discussion and agreement, but nevertheless presents a comprehensive, objective and
balanced view of the subject matter.
Not exact matches
However, news stories about the
subject are obliged to include the
view of those who do not believe it is real — leading to stories that are so «
balanced» that they will lead readers to think that opinion is split down the middle.
Adhering to these traditional concepts the US Department
of Agriculture has concluded that diets, which reduce calories, will result in effective weight loss independent
of the macronutrient composition, which is considered less important, even irrelevant.14 In contrast with these
views, the majority
of ad - libitum studies demonstrate that
subjects who follow a low - carbohydrate diet lose more weight during the first 3 — 6 months compared with those who follow
balanced diets.15, 16, 17 One hypothesis is that the use
of energy from proteins in VLCKD is an «expensive» process for the body and so can lead to a «waste
of calories», and therefore increased weight loss compared with other «less - expensive» diets.13, 18, 19 The average human body requires 60 — 65 g
of glucose per day, and during the first phase
of a diet very low in carbohydrates this is partially (16 %) obtained from glycerol, with the major part derived via gluconeogenesis from proteins
of either dietary or tissue origin.12 The energy cost
of gluconeogenesis has been confirmed in several studies7 and it has been calculated at ∼ 400 — 600 Kcal / day (due to both endogenous and food source proteins.18 Despite this, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this intriguing hypothesis; on the contrary, a recent study reported that there were no changes in resting energy expenditure after a VLCKD.20 A simpler, perhaps more likely, explanation for improved weight loss is a possible appetite - suppressant action
of ketosis.
Thanks for a sane and
balanced view of an insanity - producing
subject.
Kindly read: MFs are
subject to risks — My
view List
of investment options Best
Balanced funds
The recent use
of oceanic
subject matter refers back to some earlier works
of fleshy figures, carefully
balancing between imagery that can be
viewed as both erotic and beautiful.
The BBC is committed to providing programming on the
subject of climate change which represents a full range
of views but which also properly reflects the
balance of scientific opinion.
To counter criticism
of the business community from college campuses, business organizations such as the Chamber
of Commerce should support scholars who will defend the free enterprise system, develop speakers and support speakers» bureaus that will counter the liberal rhetoric coming from college campuses,
subject textbooks to ideological review, insist on equal time for speakers exposing the
views of the business community for speakers on campuses, insist that college faculties be
balanced by those who will defend the free enterprise system, request that graduate schools
of business include courses that support the free enterprise system, encourage local chambers
of commerce to provide the
views of the business community in high schools, establish staff who work with the media to communicate to the general public the
views of the business community, monitor and criticize television programs that unfairly criticize the free enterprise system and where appropriate file complaints with the Federal Communications Commission, monitor radio and other media and pressure them to cover the
views of defenders
of the free enterprise system, support scholars who support the free enterprise system to publish in scholarly journals, establish incentives for scholars to publish defenses
of free enterprise in books, papers, and pamphlets, spend more money on advertising that expressly supports the free market system.
I fear that some will endorse your letter, in the mistaken belief that you are making a
balanced and knowledgeable assessment
of the science — when, in fact, you are presenting a flawed
view that neither accords with IPCC nor with the bulk
of the scientific and economic literature on the
subject.