This is essential reading for policy specialists concerned with
balancing school autonomy and government oversight, and with debates over parental choice of schools.
Not exact matches
Faith
schools undermine social cohesion, discriminate in admissions and employment (potentially affecting up to 1 in 3 teaching posts) and may teach that a single world view is the correct one, without ever exposing pupils to other world views or philosophies, disregarding children's
autonomy and their right to a
balanced education.
This is potentially at odds with Mr Gove's previous statement that «I do not believe that the Government's policy of promoting
autonomy, encouraging
schools to convert to Academy status and establishing new Free Schools and Academies will alter the balance between faith and non-faith schools in this country.
schools to convert to Academy status and establishing new Free
Schools and Academies will alter the balance between faith and non-faith schools in this country.
Schools and Academies will alter the
balance between faith and non-faith
schools in this country.
schools in this country.»
Some are both familiar and basically applicable, such as «set clear goals,» have checkpoints along the way to gauge (and control) student progress, worry a lot about teacher quality (principals, too), finance
schools equitably, strike the right
balance between
autonomy and accountability, strive for a coherent «system,» etc..
Fordham is a charter authorizer itself (in our home state of Ohio) and we're keenly aware of the need to
balance the risk that a new
school may struggle academically against a charter's right to
autonomy and innovation.
Possible strategies include certification waiver processes and alternate routes that
balance charter
school autonomy and accountability.
It will also be difficult to find the right
balance between regulation and
autonomy that maximizes the potential benefits of
school choice without sacrificing accountability.
Balancing Autonomy and Accountability in
School Leadership: An Interview With New York City's Shael Polakow - Suransky
We recognize that
autonomy and differentiation among
schools are important attributes of the charter
school movement and authorizers must continue to
balance the rights of
schools to be autonomous while protecting the rights of students to be treated in a legal and non-discriminatory manner.
While observing 133 high
school classrooms, Deci and colleagues found that students were most engaged when teachers
balanced structure with
autonomy — communicating «clear expectations» for learning and «explicit directions,» while «highlighting meaningful learning goals» and providing opportunities for self - directed learning (Jang, Reeve, & Deci, 2010, p. 588).
Allowing
schools to choose from a menu of nationally norm - referenced tests would more appropriately
balance accountability and
autonomy.
(Calif.) There are signs that a confrontation may be brewing as lawmakers attempt legislation that strikes a
balance between open government and charter
school autonomy.
Moreover, we appreciate the many ways the regulations highlight priority actions and conditions necessary for
school leaders to be most effective — such as elevating the importance of hiring turnaround leaders who are trained for or have a record of success in low - performing
schools and providing principals with
balanced autonomy to transform underperforming
schools.
There is
balanced autonomy in which
school leaders are expected to support district - wide priorities, goals, and initiatives — but they also have discretion, within guidelines and subject to approval, to implement them in ways that fit the context and needs of their
schools.