Sentences with phrase «bank saw reason»

So I'm glad the bank saw reason and made me whole.

Not exact matches

«Provided the Fed conveys a steady - as - she - goes approach and it isn't seen to be back tracking - and there is no reason from the data why it should - the dollar should be consolidating and pushing on from this level,» said Bank of New York Mellon senior currency strategist Neil Mellor.

Poloz's press conference followed the release of the central bank's December Financial System Review, which concluded that a record household debt burden makes Canada vulnerable to a housing crash, although policy makers see little reason to think that will happen.

When people see banks browbeating the bond rating agencies and accounting firms to whitewash the quality of what they're pawning off on their customers, when they see bank lobbyists getting Washington to block state prosecutions of financial fraud so as to clear the way for more predatory lending and false packaging of the junk securities they're selling and to win the right not to reveal their true financial position, there's a good reason not to buy what's in these black boxes.

But banks are not lending more, for the simple reason that a third of U.S. real estate already is in negative equity, while small and medium - sized businesses (which have created most of the new jobs in America for the past few decades) have seen their preferred collateral (real estate and sales orders) shrink.

While there are plenty of reasons to conclude rate hikes are in store for Canada, it's tougher to see the country's central banks getting far ahead of the Federal Reserve.

Notley may be holding back for a number of reasons: (1) electoral reform wasn't part of her platform so she may be reluctant to spring it on Albertans, (2) she may be waiting to see how Trudeau's electoral reform works out and (3) she may be banking on the fact that the WR and PCs won't get it together in time for the next election.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

«We have visual recordings of what happened in Tafo where some people are seen wielding knives and machetes and entering the bank, but I can not go into details for security reasons,» he explained.

We've got a lot of advantages that we can bank on and put forward to the Army as reasons why we should in fact see an increase rather than a decrease,» he said.

The bathers that gather every summer on the banks of the rivers of the mountain ranges of La Cabrera and El Teleno in León have little reason to suspect that the rocks that they can see near the water are of volcanic origin, over 460 million years old, when an emerging Iberian Peninsula was still on the coast of the continent of Gondwana, on the shore of the Rheic ocean.

I have a group scholarship plan for my son and i did my homework on it, did you know that these plans had been around since 1972, alot of people and financial planners don't know this.Financial planners and banks only really started focusing on resps since 1998 when the cesg came out, as they saw the potential for more business.the reason i am saying they are flexable is when you start a plan it starts off as a group plan, if your child doesn, t further his / her education you simply choose the self determined option and your interst is there for you to roll into your rrsps or withdraw subject to taxes.

But TD has been in operation since the mid-1800s and I see no reason why the bank is in any immediate trouble.

It's funny, people point to the recent Great Recession and some bank stocks cutting dividends as a reason that DGI somehow doesn't work, yet you would have been hard pressed to see a 20 % pay cut as a dividend growth investor, even at the height of it all — unless you were primarily invested in bank stocks and didn't give a damn about diversification.

Here are the top 5 reasons why people can't qualify for a mortgage with their bank and come to see an independent mortgage specialist.

The reason being is that it is more «out - of - sight, out - of - mind» than if it were with our regular bank where I could see it every day when checking our checking account balance.

I don't see any reason why the bank wouldn't go for that, especially if you've got a good payment history on your existing mortgage.

Some lenders will want to see additional cash reserves in the bank as well, especially if you are viewed as a higher risk borrower for some reason.

For example, I see no reason to carry a Barclaycard Arrival + or a Bank of America TravelRewards card, though it certainly may still be worth applying for those cards from time to time.

For example, a bank can deny you for too little income, although that wasn't a reason given in the data I saw.

For the general traveler, I've seen greater value for members who choose to continue their card relationship with US Bank and that program, for the reasons I stated earlier.

R. v. Sheppard applies in at least some areas of private law, includes claims for damages in tort and contract: see Cojocaru v. British Columbia Women's Hospital and Health Centre, [2013] 2 SCR 357, 2013 SCC 30; Hill v. Hamilton - Wentworth Regional Police Services Board, [2007] 3 SCR 129, 2007 SCC 41 at paras. 100 - 101; and, at the provincial appellate level, including: Bunan v. Toronto - Dominion Bank, 2015 ONCA 226 at para. 20 -LRB-»... the test on appeal is whether any deficiency in the reasons has occasioned prejudice to the exercise of [the appellant's] legal right to an appeal» [internal quotations marks omitted]-RRB-; Maple Ridge Community Management Ltd. v. Peel Condominium Corporation No. 231, 2015 ONCA 520

Many people may decide not to invest in XRP for personal reasons, especially if they are invested in cryptocurrency because they see cryptocurrency as an escape from the banking cartel and government control.

Reason Three — You're Afraid Your Spouse Is Hiding Assets — There are plenty of times I've seen hidden bank accounts, shell corporations and even an out of wedlock child pop up in a divorce case.

«Initially our mind - set was that commercial conditions would improve within 18 months, so we didn't see any reason to sell properties at low prices,» says Frank Lafalce, executive vice president of special assets for the Florida Bank, headquartered in Tampa, Fla..

Now, in states where state - chartered banks are allowed into brokerage, few banks have moved into that business because they don't see any reason to do so, Mansell said in his testimony.

One of the reasons mixed - use projects can be hard to finance is that this type of commercial development is sometimes seen as riskier by many banks and lending institutions.

As a lender myself I have to say there is a reason the lender (bank) wants to see you personally come up with the cash down payment... borrowers need to have skin in the game... the truth is many borrowers (not you) aren't motivated to get up in the morning to complete the project if they don't have anything to lose.