Sentences with phrase «banning certain breeds of dog»

Sam's outrage over the mistreatment and neglect of dogs by their owners, and the overreaction by the public by banning certain breeds of dog, gave Sam Basso a mission: to educate the public about responsible dog ownership.

Do you believe banning certain breeds of dog will put a halt to issues / problems associated with dangerous dogs?

The fact that we now have an abundance of data showing that banning certain breeds of dog does nothing to decrease the number of serious dog bites helps as well.

Why do you think it's a bad idea to ban certain breeds of dog?

In response to dog biting incidents, laws are being passed to ban certain breeds of dog.

Banning certain breeds of dogs spread through cities and states like wildfire.

In 1991 the UK introduced the Dangerous Dogs Act, which banned certain breeds of dogs such as the Pit Bull Terrier and Japanese Tosa, and made it easier for police to prosecute people who organized dog fights.

Not exact matches

Interestingly, the ban on certain breeds (e.g., pit - bull types in the United Kingdom in the 1990s), invariably fails to lower the number of dog bites, which keeps rising.

A breed ban usually requires that all dogs of a certain appearance («targeted breed») be removed from the municipality wherein the ban has been implemented.

Breed bans and the increasingly widespread practice by insurance companies to deny homeowners» coverage for certain dog breeds virtually guarantee euthanasia of otherwise adoptable dogs by shelters and humane societies.

The province of Quebec is currently considering banning certain dog breeds.

The different opinions regarding the ban have led some crucial figures in Aurora to associate the banned dog breeds with certain social classes of people and races.

Although the ban on breed specific legislation allows Delaware's dog owners to open their family to any dog they choose, it does not prohibit landlords or property managers from barring certain breeds from housing, an issue that a large number of dog owners face.

We often hear about Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) where a state or province has introduced a ban or restrictions to owning a certain breed ofBreed Specific Legislation (BSL) where a state or province has introduced a ban or restrictions to owning a certain breed ofbreed of dog.

United Airlines announced more than 40 breeds of dogs and certain breeds of cats that would be banned from its flights starting in June.

Under the law, any of the banned breeds — this includes American Pit Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, and any dog mixed with or sharing certain physical characteristics with a banned breed — could be «grandfathered in,» but owners must have applied for a special permit or risk having their dog seized.

Data shows dog bites continue to rise in areas where certain breeds of dogs are banned.

The ultimate outcome of this committee is a report that concludes the banning of certain breeds in the UK is accepted as a failure in reducing bites by both targeted dogs and all others.

Horrible cases of dog attacks bring a flurry of laws to restrict or ban certain breeds or mixes in a frantic attempt to protect the public from dogs perceived as aggressive because of their appearance or because a similar dog committed a hostile action against a person or pet.

Breed specific legislation, or BSL, is a law that bans or restricts certain breeds of dogs from being owned in a particular area.

BSL is the umbrella term for laws passed at the state or local level that restrict or ban certain breeds in the hopes of reducing dog attacks.

Breed discrimination often comes in the form of Breed - Specific Legislation (BSL), which allows jurisdictions to ban people from having a certain breed of dog — usually, any dog that is determined to fall under the «Pit Bull» cateBreed discrimination often comes in the form of Breed - Specific Legislation (BSL), which allows jurisdictions to ban people from having a certain breed of dog — usually, any dog that is determined to fall under the «Pit Bull» cateBreed - Specific Legislation (BSL), which allows jurisdictions to ban people from having a certain breed of dog — usually, any dog that is determined to fall under the «Pit Bull» catebreed of dog — usually, any dog that is determined to fall under the «Pit Bull» category.

BSLs encompass a wide range of legislations from requiring special licensing or accommodations for certain breeds of dogs to the outright banning and elimination of them.

They're on board with all breeds of dogs being individuals and shouldn't have a blanket ban on certain breeds.

Breed - specific legislation sometimes stops short of outright bans, but regulates how certain dogs may be kept, including mandatory spay / neuter regulations and requirements to muzzle dogs in public.

Even some cities and municipalities are banning dogs of certain breeds!

And the problems also include cities and shelters that like Aurora and Denver, CO that choose to kill all dogs of certain breeds because they look like types of dogs they don't want in their city (regardless of the reality that their own statistics don't support their ideas to ban these dogs, nor do the dogs themselves, based on their actual behavior, pose any threat to the public).

Apartment complexes routinely ban dogs of certain breeds and of certain weights.

When animal control resources are used to regulate or ban a certain breed, the focus is shifted away from effective enforcement of laws that have the best chances of making communities safer: dog license laws, leash laws, anti-animal fighting laws, anti-tethering laws, laws facilitating spaying and neutering and laws that require all owners to control their dogs, regardless of breed.

Notwithstanding relative stability in the number of dog bites over time (Bradley, 2006), and the fact that according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) only two percent of those seeking emergency room treatment for dog bites each year are actually hospitalized (CDC WISQARS), some communities have enacted laws that intensively regulate or even ban certain dog breeds in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans (AVMA, 2001).

That's very silly and ignorant coming from the biased media (around the world, not only in the US) and Miami - Dade County, banning and profiling certain dog breeds because of absurd statistics without considering the dog background of neglect and violence from their owners who only want to show off posing as «da bad boyz of da hood» (sic).

Breed - specific legislation (BSL) bans OR restricts certain types of dogs based on their appearance because they are perceived as «dangerous» breeds or types of dogs.

• Twenty - two jurisdictions instituted statewide bans on breed - specific legislation (or «BSL») by either prohibiting municipalities from regulating or outlawing certain dogs based on breed alone, or otherwise require proof of a dog's supposed dangerous propensities beyond mere breed: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware *, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington.

BDL refers to laws that ban or restrict certain types of dogs based simply on their appearance or breed.

More specifically, the term refers to regional laws that ban or regulate certain breeds of dog in the hopes of reducing attacks on humans.

Given the steady stream of news about municipalities all across the country considering some type of ban on pets — whether it's a ban on selling pets in pet stores or a ban on certain dog breeds — it is nice to hear that at least one local legislature is considering a ban on, well, bans.

Breed bans usually require all dogs of a certain appearance be removed; destroyed / killed.

With breed bans gaining popularity, shelters and rescue groups wondering what «temperament test» to use, veterinary staff dreading to see certain patients on the appointment log, and dog owners being told the importance of «being alpha», it's no wonder that confusion is rampant in identifying high risk dogs, creating effective public policies, and preventing and resolving aggression problems.

But we have created Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), which are laws that ban the ownership of certain kinds of dogs — generally pit bulls, Rottweilers, German shepherds, and several other power breeds.

In response, lawmakers have enacted Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), more commonly known as «breed bans,» which effectively outlaw certain types of Breed Specific Legislation (BSL), more commonly known as «breed bans,» which effectively outlaw certain types of breed bans,» which effectively outlaw certain types of dogs.

Breed specific legislation (or BSL) are laws regulate or ban certain dog breeds in an attempt to reduce the number of attacks on humans, but are they fair?

As a result, numerous U.S. cities and municipalities have instituted leash laws and ordinances, calling for the ban of certain dog breeds.