Sentences with phrase «banning certain dog»

Local governments would be prohibited from banning certain dog breeds.

The province of Quebec is currently considering banning certain dog breeds.

Breed - specific legislation (BSL) is the blanket term for laws that either regulate or ban certain dog breeds in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans and other animals.

Notwithstanding relative stability in the number of dog bites over time (Bradley, 2006), and the fact that according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) only two percent of those seeking emergency room treatment for dog bites each year are actually hospitalized (CDC WISQARS), some communities have enacted laws that intensively regulate or even ban certain dog breeds in an effort to decrease dog attacks on humans (AVMA, 2001).

Breed specific legislation (or BSL) are laws regulate or ban certain dog breeds in an attempt to reduce the number of attacks on humans, but are they fair?

Not exact matches

Government plans to cut down on gangs in the wake of the summer riots could see youths banned from walking «aggressive dogs» or congregating in certain areas.

Interestingly, the ban on certain breeds (e.g., pit - bull types in the United Kingdom in the 1990s), invariably fails to lower the number of dog bites, which keeps rising.

Other measures may include banning the pets from certain areas of the house, hiring someone to come walk your dogs or clean up after your pets when you don't have time to, etc..

We have to recognized the truth: certain pet owners will continue to use any and every method of training dogs regardless of scientific evidence, as long as these devices are not banned.

A breed ban usually requires that all dogs of a certain appearance («targeted breed») be removed from the municipality wherein the ban has been implemented.

In certain countries, however, the African Boerboel has been banned for either its size or skepticism concerning its use as a fighting dog.

Breed bans and the increasingly widespread practice by insurance companies to deny homeowners» coverage for certain dog breeds virtually guarantee euthanasia of otherwise adoptable dogs by shelters and humane societies.

Q: The results claim that my dog's family tree may include a breed that is banned by certain residential communities, should I be worried?

The different opinions regarding the ban have led some crucial figures in Aurora to associate the banned dog breeds with certain social classes of people and races.

The fact that we now have an abundance of data showing that banning certain breeds of dog does nothing to decrease the number of serious dog bites helps as well.

Why do you think it's a bad idea to ban certain breeds of dog?

In response to dog biting incidents, laws are being passed to ban certain breeds of dog.

Although the ban on breed specific legislation allows Delaware's dog owners to open their family to any dog they choose, it does not prohibit landlords or property managers from barring certain breeds from housing, an issue that a large number of dog owners face.

We often hear about Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) where a state or province has introduced a ban or restrictions to owning a certain breed of dog.

United Airlines announced more than 40 breeds of dogs and certain breeds of cats that would be banned from its flights starting in June.

Under the law, any of the banned breeds — this includes American Pit Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers, and any dog mixed with or sharing certain physical characteristics with a banned breed — could be «grandfathered in,» but owners must have applied for a special permit or risk having their dog seized.

It started across the pond in Europe where the country began banning certain breeds to reduce dog bite incidents.

Banning certain breeds of dogs spread through cities and states like wildfire.

Data shows dog bites continue to rise in areas where certain breeds of dogs are banned.

If a certain breed is banned, mixing it with a legal breed will also make the mixed dog illegal.

The ultimate outcome of this committee is a report that concludes the banning of certain breeds in the UK is accepted as a failure in reducing bites by both targeted dogs and all others.

Do you believe banning certain breeds of dog will put a halt to issues / problems associated with dangerous dogs?

Horrible cases of dog attacks bring a flurry of laws to restrict or ban certain breeds or mixes in a frantic attempt to protect the public from dogs perceived as aggressive because of their appearance or because a similar dog committed a hostile action against a person or pet.

According to the column, there's no law that prohibits requiring tenants to have pets — just as there is no law that prohibits landlords from banning them, or banning certain breeds, or banning dogs over a certain weight.

Breed specific legislation, or BSL, is a law that bans or restricts certain breeds of dogs from being owned in a particular area.

There is zero evidence that supports banning certain types of dogs actually lowers incidents of dog bites in the U.S. — zero.

BSL is the umbrella term for laws passed at the state or local level that restrict or ban certain breeds in the hopes of reducing dog attacks.

Breed discrimination often comes in the form of Breed - Specific Legislation (BSL), which allows jurisdictions to ban people from having a certain breed of dog — usually, any dog that is determined to fall under the «Pit Bull» category.

BSLs encompass a wide range of legislations from requiring special licensing or accommodations for certain breeds of dogs to the outright banning and elimination of them.

They're on board with all breeds of dogs being individuals and shouldn't have a blanket ban on certain breeds.

Breed - specific legislation sometimes stops short of outright bans, but regulates how certain dogs may be kept, including mandatory spay / neuter regulations and requirements to muzzle dogs in public.

When someone makes a statement like «Acana» should be banned or removed because it is a terrible dog food, their is no doubt in my mind that that person works for a certain dog food company.

Even some cities and municipalities are banning dogs of certain breeds!

And the problems also include cities and shelters that like Aurora and Denver, CO that choose to kill all dogs of certain breeds because they look like types of dogs they don't want in their city (regardless of the reality that their own statistics don't support their ideas to ban these dogs, nor do the dogs themselves, based on their actual behavior, pose any threat to the public).

Apartment complexes routinely ban dogs of certain breeds and of certain weights.

When animal control resources are used to regulate or ban a certain breed, the focus is shifted away from effective enforcement of laws that have the best chances of making communities safer: dog license laws, leash laws, anti-animal fighting laws, anti-tethering laws, laws facilitating spaying and neutering and laws that require all owners to control their dogs, regardless of breed.

Our company does not believe in banning certain breeds; instead we prefer to evaluate dogs on their individual qualities to evaluate how well they might do when introduced to Doggie Day Camp.

That's very silly and ignorant coming from the biased media (around the world, not only in the US) and Miami - Dade County, banning and profiling certain dog breeds because of absurd statistics without considering the dog background of neglect and violence from their owners who only want to show off posing as «da bad boyz of da hood» (sic).

In 1991 the UK introduced the Dangerous Dogs Act, which banned certain breeds of dogs such as the Pit Bull Terrier and Japanese Tosa, and made it easier for police to prosecute people who organized dog figDogs Act, which banned certain breeds of dogs such as the Pit Bull Terrier and Japanese Tosa, and made it easier for police to prosecute people who organized dog figdogs such as the Pit Bull Terrier and Japanese Tosa, and made it easier for police to prosecute people who organized dog fights.

Breed - specific legislation (BSL) bans OR restricts certain types of dogs based on their appearance because they are perceived as «dangerous» breeds or types of dogs.

• Twenty - two jurisdictions instituted statewide bans on breed - specific legislation (or «BSL») by either prohibiting municipalities from regulating or outlawing certain dogs based on breed alone, or otherwise require proof of a dog's supposed dangerous propensities beyond mere breed: Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware *, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington.

Under BSL, cities, or even countries, ban certain types of dogs, regardless of their individual temperament.

In addition to banning non-dog and - cat pets, the program, which previously only banned 6 dog breeds, now bans over 40 different dogs — including certain mixed - breed dogs, and 4 different cat breeds from cargo travel.

BDL refers to laws that ban or restrict certain types of dogs based simply on their appearance or breed.

Dogs who were already in the city at the time of the ban were allowed to stay if their owners paid a registration fee and followed certain restrictions.