Some of our traditions reckon
baptism as a sacrament of constitutive importance for Christian existence.
In contrast, the Christian Church regards
baptism as a sacrament, that means that God acts during baptism.
Hellenistic Christianity saw
baptism as a sacrament of dying and rising, thus sharing in the experience and destiny of the crucified and risen Lord.
And in an Indian situation where baptism is the legal mark of change of one religious community to another, each with its own civil codes recognized by the Courts, communalisation of church life is imposed by Law and perverts the meaning of
baptism as sacrament of faith.
Not exact matches
As I recall, the
sacrament of
baptism was for those repenting — not for anyone who just felt like having it.
The oneness of the church — one Lord, one faith, one
baptism — is
as integral to being a part of Christ's body
as receiving the
sacrament of bread and wine.
The administration of the Church's
sacraments is equally important, of course, and this is especially true for us if we accept the position of the sixteenth - century Reformers that in the celebration of the
sacraments of
Baptism and Holy Communion,
as well
as in the pulpit, the gospel is proclaimed and expressed.
Baptism has long been recognized
as the
sacrament of equality (Gal.
Now, Jesus did submit to the
sacrament of water
baptism (what Quakers call «John's
baptism»), but is never recorded
as baptizing with water.
But the sense of the
sacraments as sign - acts through which God acts here and now to accomplish his own purposes seems strangely absent in most
baptisms and celebrations of the Lords Supper.
These two
sacraments can be understood
as closely linked to the two-fold meaning of salvation which we have already considered — penance leading to the forgiveness of sin committed after
baptism, and the Eucharist leading to the fullness of God's own life.
At first the ritual was doubtless figurative, a ceremonial cleansing in water, which was regarded
as symbolizing, rather than effecting, the purification of the inner life, and the origin of which lay in the
baptism of John and kindred customs rather than in the
sacraments of the mystery religions.
The Church ought, for example, long ago to have abolished genuflection before the Blessed
Sacrament in Japan in favour of a deep bow, in deference to Japanese feelings, or to have ceased using spittle at
baptism,
as has now been done.
Marriage is a «
sacrament» just
as baptism is.
I am not a Catholic but a Protestant; yet I regard
Baptism and the Lord's Supper
as sacraments according to the German reformers Luther and Bonhoeffer.
In the Christian Institute for the Study - of Religion and Society there was an open discussion about a proposal that since Christ transcended not only cultures but also religions and ideologies, the fellowship of confessors of faith in Jesus
as the Messiah should not separate from their original religious or secular ideological community but should form fellowships of Christian faith in those communities themselves, and that so long
as the Law sees
baptism as transference from one community to another it should not be made the condition of entry into the fellowship of the
sacrament of the Lord's Supper but made a sacramental privilege for a later time (Ref.
Along with attending to the Word, Christians have felt God's redemptive love quite palpably in such
sacraments as baptism, Eucharist, and marriage.
Discipleship in the world today means following a living Jesus
as he is proclaimed in the preaching of the church and in the
Sacraments of
Baptism and Communion.
Like the poet Heinrich Heine, he considered the
sacrament of
baptism only
as «an entrance card into the community of European culture».
In a
sacrament, a material and visible — in brief, a «sensible» — thing or action is taken and used by God, in accordance with the will of Christ (whether that is by direct institution,
as with the eucharist, or through what Christians believe to be by the Spirit in the life of the fellowship,
as with
baptism), to convey and to effect a spiritual, invisible result.
But the main stress in the
sacrament is found not so much in that kind of talk (which may be appropriate enough for an adult) but in the simple words with which the minister of
baptism signs the baptized person with the sign of the cross
as he or she is «received into the congregation of Christ's flock»: that «hereafter he [or she] shall not be ashamed to confess the faith of Christ crucified, and manfully to fight under his banner, against sin, the world, and the devil, and to continue Christ's faithful soldier and servant unto his [her] life's end.»
The Pope said «It is my hope that your conversations will bear abundant fruit in the examination of such historically controversial issues
as the relationship between Scripture and Tradition, the understanding of
baptism and the
sacraments, the place of Mary in the communion of the Church, and the nature of oversight and primacy in the Church's ministerial structure.
The
sacraments do not remove the need for faith, nor can one sever the link between
baptism, confirmation, and Eucharist
as together comprising the
sacraments of initiation.
As a Baptist I only recognize two
sacraments —
baptism and communion — but I'm firmly against having either of them administered by smartphone (immersion
baptism and iPhones definitely don't mix).
As a result, Protestantism has two - and - a-half
sacraments:
baptism and a penitential Eucharist.
In
as much
as the Church of North India will have within its membership both persons who practise Infant
Baptism in the sincere belief that this is in harmony with the mind of the Lord, and those whose conviction it is that the
Sacrament can only properly be administered to a believer, both Infant
Baptism and Believer's
Baptism shall be accepted
as alternative practices in the Church of North India.
Part of my job,
as a minister in The United Church of Canada is to celebrate the
sacraments of
baptism (in the name of the Trinity, in fact, we still have to use the traditional trinitarian formula, even if we wish we could do otherwise) and communion.
The manner of it becomes dearer when we consider the
sacraments of
Baptism and the Eucharist (the Holy Communion or Lord's Supper, or,
as it is called in some Western churches, the Mass).
Catholic Church recognizes the
sacrament of
baptism as valid in all christian denominations.
Baptism opens up the way of Christian life: it is completed by the
sacrament of confirmation, and then throughout the Christian's life he can receive God's forgiveness through the
sacrament of reconciliation, and be fed by the Eucharist: «Priests are stewards of the means of salvation, of the
sacraments... not to dispense them according to their own will, but
as humble servants for the good of the People of God» (Benedict XVI).14
The church's witness to the reign of God is crucial but also provisional, for the mystery of God is beyond all domestication,
as evidenced in Barth's radical rethinking of
baptism and the Lord's Supper
as witness to something from on high rather than
as the established «
sacraments» of Christendom.
A second is the Catholic doctrine of
baptism, especially its emphasis on the regenerative quality of the
sacrament and its possible domestic and political implications, which the Church continues to acknowledge in her codified counsel regarding near - death situations,
as well
as in her use of the Pauline privilege, which allows for the dissolution of a marriage between two non-baptized persons if one of them should subsequently receive
baptism.
So,
as when a Christian first joins God's Church, he does so through the formal Church rite of the
sacrament of
baptism, and
as when his life further progresses it is marked and strengthened by other
sacraments of the Church, so when he had damaged his relationship with God and his Church, and, by doing so, threatened or injured that of others, a
sacrament of the Church makes provision or formal statements of sorrow by the sinner, of God's forgiveness by his Church, and for a means of spiritual help, grace, to help the sinner to carry out his intention to amend.
The discourses of Jesus, for example, upon
Baptism (3) and upon the Eucharist (6) reflect the same fundamental conception of the significance and necessity of these two rites; that this conception was that of the evangelist is plain, e.g. from 3:16 - 21, where Jesus» words have passed insensibly into the evangelist's reflection upon them; if the evangelist was the son of Zebedee, it would be natural to accept his accounts
as substantially correct records of incidents and discourses from Jesus» ministry, but, if he was not, a comparison with the synoptic gospels and with the teaching of Paul and others on the
sacraments would suggest doubts
as to the historical value of both discourses.
The second was the catechumenate
as a process of preparation for
Baptism, including an intense period of preparation for the
Sacraments of Initiation to be celebrated at Easter.