Sentences with phrase «barely seen at points»

On the northern side of the rock, in waters not deeper than 8 meters / 25 feet, the subtract is barely seen at points, where the coral cover is denser.

Not exact matches

At this point with our early injury concerns, Nastasic isn't looking to bad and even though I haven't seen Carvalho play besides the World Cup I would have swapped him for Arteta and or Flamini in a heartbeat, also since we barely play Podolski anyways we should have strengthen the LW as well by selling him and going all out for Di Maria (didn't take long for him to adapt did it?)

At that point the Kings were barely alive at +10,000 to win the Stanley Cup, and you can see how the future odds have changed over the course of the seasoAt that point the Kings were barely alive at +10,000 to win the Stanley Cup, and you can see how the future odds have changed over the course of the seasoat +10,000 to win the Stanley Cup, and you can see how the future odds have changed over the course of the season.

She was born «sunny side up» and I tore badly and hemorrhaged after I had her (the placenta wouldn't come out), and I was so drugged at that point that I barely remember seeing her for the first time, let alone holding her or breastfeeding her.

You only see him when he lands on a telephone wire and gets electrocuted — at which point he becomes visible as Brad Pitt for barely a second.

While the Nav9's 802.11 b / g Wi - Fi saw very good throughput at 15 feet from our access point (an average of 34.7 Mbps), its range was severely limited; we barely got a connection at 50 feet, and when we did, throughput averaged 0.3 Mbps.

At this point in time it looks as though the S&P is going to acquire it's full double bottom target at 2084.30 (calculation shown on chart) as there is barely a glimmer of bearish price action to work with and as we saw Friday, any kind of dip is bought with both fistAt this point in time it looks as though the S&P is going to acquire it's full double bottom target at 2084.30 (calculation shown on chart) as there is barely a glimmer of bearish price action to work with and as we saw Friday, any kind of dip is bought with both fistat 2084.30 (calculation shown on chart) as there is barely a glimmer of bearish price action to work with and as we saw Friday, any kind of dip is bought with both fists.

At this point, I had resisted Joy Machine, LLC in East Lansing, Michigan and decided I wanted to take Steel Hunters (which I wanted to call Steel Harvest (based on my love of Dashiell Hammett's Red Harvest), but barely a day later I saw the first story on Iron Harvest and revised the name a bit.

We might have seen it before; it's September and I barely recognise my own face at this point.

Though it should be pointed out that my SAW function is exactly the opposite: at the end of the data it barely deviates at all from the 3 K assumption, all the deviation is well away from the ends.

To point out just a couple of things: — oceans warming slower (or cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).

When we look at the graph above, you can barely even see the 2012 numbers because the sales numbers are so close to what they were in 2013, but the price points for the sales differ considerably.