Sentences with phrase «bargaining affects student»

This post provides an overview of what we know about how teacher collective bargaining affects student achievement and why obtaining answers to this question is so difficult.

In a new Education Next article «A Bad Bargain: How teacher collective bargaining affects students» employment and earnings later in life,» Michael Lovenheim and Alexander Willén of Cornell University present the first evidence that students» exposure to a duty - to - bargain law while in elementary and secondary school lowers future earnings and leads to fewer hours worked, reductions in employment, and decreases in labor force participation.

Collective Bargaining Across the States Winter 2016 • Accompanies A Bad Bargain How teacher collective bargaining affects students» employment and earnings later in life By Alexander Willén and Michael F. Lovenheim

«A Bad Bargain: How teacher collective bargaining affects students» employment and earnings later in life» will be available Tuesday, November 17 on educationnext.org and will appear in the Winter 2016 issue of Education Next, on newsstands by November 20.

Along with Alexander Willen, Mike is the author of a new study in the latest issue of Education Next with the title «'' A Bad Bargain: How teacher collective bargaining affects students» employment and earnings later in life.»

Recent changes in collective bargaining rights in states such as Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan may offer new insights into how changing specific aspects of collective bargaining affects students in order to inform optimal teacher bargaining policy.

Not exact matches

That's all the more true for changes in collective bargaining — a policy that affects personnel rather than one, such as tutoring, that directly affects student learning, he said.

Matthew A. Kraft Brown University «How Does Eliminating Tenure and Collective Bargaining Affect Teacher Labor Markets and Student Achievement?»

The final budget bill cut state K - 12 spending by nearly $ 800 million, over7 percent — the largest amount in Wisconsin's history — and limited local governments» abilities to make up for these cuts through property taxes.14 That same year, Gov. Walker passed major tax cuts primarily targeted toward corporations and the wealthy that totaled $ 2.33 billion over 10 years.15 Gov. Walker and Act 10 proponents argued that the bill's reforms would allow schools to offset these cuts by reducing teachers» benefits and hiring lower - paid teachers, preventing budget cuts from affecting students.16 Gov. Walker also argued that eliminating requirements to bargain over salary structures, hiring, and working conditions would give schools additional flexibility needed to attract and retain higher - quality teachers.17