Ratings are provided for both of the individual seating positions in the side -
barrier crash safety test, as well as a combined rating for both positions, while the side - pole rating is based on a test of the frontal seating position only.
Not exact matches
Safety The 2012 Rio 5 - Door received a four - star (out of five) overall rating in National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration
crash testing, but its performance was marred by a
Safety Concern warning in the side
barrier crash test.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a Maxima with the structural and airbag modifications in a 40 mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable
barrier.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a 1999 ML 320 with the structural changes in a 40 mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable
barrier.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a GS 400 with the structural changes in a 40 mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable
barrier.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the CTS in two 40 mph frontal offset
crash tests into deformable
barriers.
All Topics Accessibility Automated Flaggers Clear Zones Construction and Maintenance Personnel Flaggers Construction Management Contracts Crash
Tests Crashes Crash Data Crash Investigation Crash Prevention Data Collection Design Roadside Design Driver Education Equipment Handling Equipment Maintenance Equipment Operation Excavation Trenching Hazards Impact Analysis Incident Management Inspection Installation Intelligent Transportation Systems Changeable Message Signs Portable Changeable Message Signs Landscape Maintenance Law Enforcement Photo Enforcement Lighting Maintenance Practices Mobility Night Work Public Relations Public Information Programs Retroreflectivity Rural Highways
Safety Technology Speed Control Speed Limits Standards Surveying Teenage Drivers Temporary Traffic Control Flagging Lane Closure Signing Traffic Control Plans Tort Liability Traffic Congestion Traffic Control Devices Arrow Panels
Barriers Guardrails Temporary
Barriers Temporary Concrete
Barriers Channelizing Devices Crash Cushions Truck - Mounted Attenuators Delineators Pavement Markings Rumble Strips Temporary Rumble Strips Signs Warning Lights Traffic Queuing Traffic Violations Speeding Training Train the Trainer Urban Highways Utility Operations Visibility Websites Work Zone
Safety Pedestrian
Safety Work Zone Supervision Work Zones Mobile Operations Short - term Stationary Worker
Safety Backing (Driving) Personal Protective Equipment Protective Clothing
The side -
crash safety evaluations continue to include the side -
barrier test used previously where a moving
barrier strikes a stationary vehicle at an angle.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the Liberty in two 40 mph moderate overlap frontal
crash tests into deformable
barriers.
In a rare show of solidarity, domestic and international automakers last week jointly attacked insurance industry
crash tests that suggest sport - utility vehicles are not as safe as their reputations.The
tests of six mid-sized sport - utilities were conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety, an organization funded by automotive insurers.The institute conducts
tests into a
barrier at 40 mph to simulate two vehicles colliding head - on, but with the
crash focused on the driver's side.
Throughout these car - to - car
crash tests (which were designed to simulate conditions considerably harsher than those found in conventional stationary -
barrier testing) the Integra was able to clear all target values, assuring the highest levels of enhanced
safety performance.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the Sienna in two 40 mph moderate overlap frontal
crash tests into deformable
barriers.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a 2001 RAV4 with the initial structural and airbag modifications in a 40 mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable
barrier.
The «plus» in Top
Safety Pick + is added if the vehicle scores an «acceptable» or «good» in their small overlap
crash test, in which the vehicle is lined up so that 25 percent of it — a front corner — overlaps with a
barrier during a frontal, 40 - mph (64 km / h) collision.
At a lecture in Sydney, Australia, he said
barrier crash tests used to set worldwide
safety standards are not necessarily a proper measure of what is safe or unsafe, and blamed government regulation.
Euro NCAP results revealed that the i30's cabin aced the frontal offset deformable
barrier and side impact
crash tests, but the hatchback also scored high in the
safety assist and pedestrian protection departments.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the Grand Caravan in three 40 mph moderate overlap frontal
crash tests into deformable
barriers.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of a Fusion with the added part in a 40 mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable
barrier.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the 2004 Elantra with the redesigned driver and passenger airbags in three 40 mph moderate overlap frontal
crash tests into deformable
barriers.
The Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety has evaluated the crashworthiness of the redesigned 2004 S40 in a 40 mph frontal offset
crash test into a deformable
barrier.