Sentences with phrase «base your decision on commission»

As you shop for a brokerage firm, don't base your decision on commission fees alone.

Not exact matches

Delta's other trade victory came on Friday, when, in a surprise decision, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled against Boeing in a bitter trade battle in which the Chicago - based company said its business was harmed by trade practices of its Canadian rival Bombardier.

«The Commission will not take adverse action on a license renewal application based upon the subjective determination of a listener or group of listeners that the station has broadcast purportedly inappropriate programming,» the FCC commissioners wrote in a recent decision challenging a local radio station license.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is expected to make a decision by March 11 whether to approve Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss's proposal for an ETF (exchange traded fund) based on bitcoin.

My column this week on the positive aspects of the CRTC's usage based billing decision has generated some sharp disagreement, with some arguing that the pricing set by the Commission is faulty and virtually guaranteed to increase consumer prices (Search Engine covers the issue and arrives at the same conclusion, Peter Nowak does as well).

While senior sales professionals focus heavily on «total income potential» — meaning they consider performance - based commissions and bonuses heavily in their decision - making — in our experience new graduates are a little more risk averse and often lean toward the biggest salary.

Decision: Based on the overwhelming evidence before the Commission, the Commission is satisfied and finds as a fact that the vehicle was received and added to the Presidential Pool on 2nd November, 2012.

Decision: On the basis of the evidence, the Commission is satisfied with the explanation from the GRA that the vehicle was assessed in accordance with sections 89 & 91 of Act 330, and not described as used vehicle to undervalue the duty payable.

Similarly, 78 percent thought that Governor Cuomo's decision to shut down the Moreland Commission, which was investigating corruption in the state legislature, was a political deal struck with legislative leaders, rather than a «decision based on good government.»

Based on what the commission said in last month's decision, it could consider the Democrats» use of the federal account to be an impermissible «coordinated expenditure» with the state account, or an illegal contribution to the state account that's not allow to accept money fromo state contractors.

The commission investigated Monserrate's fund, to which a number of lawmakers also contributed, based on a joint complaint filed by Common Cause / NY, the NY League of Women Voters and NYPIRG, which also publicized the findings (had it not been for a press release from Blair Horner this morning, I would have had no idea this decision had even been reached).

The senior advocate added, «My own understanding is that based on the Supreme Court decisions on former governor Peter Obi versus the Independent National Electoral Commission, and former governor Rasheed Ladoja against the (Oyo) state House of Assembly, Fayose is not eligible to contest another term.

The NPP said its decision not to participate in the National Commission for Civic Education and GBC debate was based on the fact that it is pre-occupied with equally important things.

The Commission on Presidential Debates rebutted Trump's assertion that Democrats are trying to «rig» the presidential debates by putting them up against nationally televised football games, reiterating that they are a nonpartisan organization that does not make decisions based on the desires of candidates.

The commission decision based on evidence presented at a public hearing in August.

A European Commission official said the decision was based on evidence that psoralen could cause skin cancer.

Many public utility commissions have concluded, based largely on court decisions under the NLRA, that they're prohibited from intervening in labor disputes even when public safety is threatened, Scott said.

«It's a meaningless process» to commission an independent external reviewer if the final decision is based on documents available only to Karolinska officials, he says.

Dr. Siegler's seminal 1981 paper on «A Proposal for a Model of the Doctor Patient Encounter» was cited extensively by the 1982 President's Commission as the basis for recommending a shared decision - making approach for doctors and patients, an approach which has now become the standard model for the doctor - patient relationship in the U.S.

It is crucial that such a commission is impartial to the self - interest of particular networks and district self - interests, and base facilities decisions on school quality, student need, and efficient usage.

Granted, the boost to starting salaries is not as great as some advocates would like — the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce has called for starting salaries of $ 45,000 — but remember that this new schedule is based on the arbitrary decision to reward credentials that improve test scores by 1 percent of a standard deviation with a 1 percent boost in salary.

The commission's decision to announce the opening of a statutory inquiry is based on whether it is in the public interest to do so and with consideration of our objective to increase public trust and confidence in charities.

107; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; 29 C.F.R. Part 1614; Executive Order 11478, Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government; Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low - Income Populations; Executive Order 13087, Further Amendment to Executive Order 11478, Equal Employment Opportunity in the Federal Government; Executive Order 13160, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Race, Sex, Color, National Origin, Disability, Religion, Age, Sexual Orientation, and Status as a Parent in Federally Conducted Education and Training Programs; Executive Order 13166, Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967; the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009; Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) regulations governing the processing of complaints of discrimination in the Federal sector; and EEOC decisions, procedures, guidelines, and program and management directives.

So it was an easy decision for the clients to participate and benefit: Trident would only charge its customary commission based on revenues received by the authors, and Trident would not become an e-book publisher, profiting at the client's expense, being a rights holder, and finding itself potentially in an adversarial position with authors.

These figures are based on the scope of the ETS as applicable in phase 2 (2008 to 2012), and the Commission's decisions on the national allocation plans for phase 2, amounting to 2083 million tonnes.

They told the Commission that they could not make political decisions based on predictions and economic modeling (both generally used in climate science) and that the report should not be used to inform further modifications to the two Directives.

In 2012 the General Court answered this question in the affirmative and annulled two decisions of the Commission which were based on a regulation which was deemed incompatible with the Aarhus Convention.

Let us urgently commission a proper survey and make an evidence - based decision on whether budgets are worth persisting with for the benefit of litigants.

First, from an EU point of view, such a decision would require the adoption of Council decision following a proposal of the Commission on the basis of Article 218 (9) TFEU.

Given that the Commission's state aid decision did not include an analysis of the original aid scheme, its decision noted that any compensation awarded to investors «on the basis that Spain has modified the premium economic [i.e. the original] scheme by the notified [i.e. amended] scheme would constitute» state aid.

While federal law does not specifically prohibit discrimination based on criminal convictions or arrests, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a policy statement indicating that an employer's use of criminal history information in making employment decisions may violate the federal prohibition against discrimination based on race or national origin.

Successfully represented a personnel placement company in a commission dispute with a former employee, securing a state court decision that limited the reach of the Massachusetts Wage Act when payment is based on contingencies (2001 WL 716911)

Based upon complaints filed by, among others, Washington DC based Judicial Watch, the Commission had sought to remove Judge Kendall from the bench on the basis of criticisms of his bail and sentencing decisions in specific cases, none of which had ever been appealed and each of which was soundly within his legal discreBased upon complaints filed by, among others, Washington DC based Judicial Watch, the Commission had sought to remove Judge Kendall from the bench on the basis of criticisms of his bail and sentencing decisions in specific cases, none of which had ever been appealed and each of which was soundly within his legal discrebased Judicial Watch, the Commission had sought to remove Judge Kendall from the bench on the basis of criticisms of his bail and sentencing decisions in specific cases, none of which had ever been appealed and each of which was soundly within his legal discretion.

The commission suggest as grounds of appeal against either DO that the person liable actually is not liable to pay maintenance or the DO has been made for the wrong amount and, against a decision on review, that there is no current maintenance calculation and the maximum deduction rate has been calculated based on the most recent information and that there has been a change in net weekly income.

The General Court annulled the Commission decision to refuse to register the Minority Safepak ECI on the basis of the first of the organiser's claims: «[The Commission] decision manifestly does not contain sufficient elements to enable the applicant to ascertain the reasons for the refusal to register the proposed ECI».

On the basis of these considerations, the Court notes that, in the Safe Harbour Decision, the Commission does not state that the US, in fact, ensures an adequate level of protection by reason of its domestic or its international commitments.

In order to support this finding, the GC based itself on recital 140 of the Decision, where the Commission found that, because of the tax transparent status of the EIGs, which enables different operators to join and finance any investment or carry out any economic activity, the tax status of the EIGs under Spanish law did not confer any selective advantage to the EIGs or to their members.

EFIM sought for an annulment of the EFIM - decision, but the General Court confirmed the findings of the Commission in its judgment of 24 November 2011 in Case T ‑ 296 / 09), including — interestingly enough — the substantive analysis of dominance based on the four criteria mentioned.

Describing the Commission's decision as a «nullity» was a pragmatic response, based on principles drawn from previous decided cases, to a threat to the separation of powers and rule of law posed by the ouster clause.

In the first action, the Law Society brought a claim seeking judicial review of the decision of the Legal Services Commission (LSC) to seek offers from firms of solicitors and not - for - profit organisations on the basis of the new unified contract.

(The record of the Commission's findings between January 2004 and July 2014 indicates that in non-cartel infringement decisions the majority (10/12) were based on a «by object» decision which saved the need for the Commission to spend time and resources in examining detailed evidence on the effect of the agreements under scrutiny).

These include: United States v. Resendiz - Ponce, which presents the question whether the omission of an element from a federal indictment can constitute harmless error (9th Circuit says no); Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Metrophones Telecommunications, Inc., on whether a provider of pay phone services can sue a long distance carrier for alleged violations of the Federal Communications Commission's regulations concerning compensation for coinless pay phone calls (9th Circuit says yes); Cunningham v. California, a sentencing case involving whether whether California's Determinate Sentencing Law violates the 6th and 14th amendments to the U.S. Constitution by permitting California state court judges at sentencing to impose enhanced sentenced based on their determination of facts neither found by the jury nor admitted by the defendant; and Carey v. Musladin, reviewing the 9th Circuit's decision to overturn a murder conviction of a defendant who claimed he was denied a fair trial because the victim's relatives appeared in court wearing buttons with the deceased's picture on them.

In this case (and furthering an unsuccessful strategy to challenge adverse award decisions that, however, has made a fundamental contribution to the development of the case law in this area), Evropaïki Dynamiki challenged the debriefing received from the European Commission both on the grounds that it was 8 days late (although both the GC and the CJEU dismiss this procedural deffect easily on the basis that the delay did not however restrict the undertaking's opportunity of asserting its rights and could not, by itself, lead to the annulment of the contested decisions) and that it was insufficient — ie that the Commission had not provided sufficient reasons to justify the award of the contract to another bidder.

Additional Resources American Bar Association Commission on Immigration American Immigration Lawyers Association Amnesty International Country Reports Asylum Pro Se Guide — English (Create by students at Stanford Law) Center for Gender and Refugee Studies, University of California, Hastings College of the Law (includes resources for gender law and asylum) Department of Justice Country Conditions Research Detention Watch Network EOIR Virtual Law Library (with BIA precedent decisions) Human Rights Watch, Country Specific Reports Human Rights Watch, Children's Rights Division Immigrant Legal Resource Center Immigration Equality (includes extensive resources for LGBT asylum claims) Immigration and Nationality Act Immigration Regulations (C.F.R. Title 8) National Immigrant Justice Center's Resources for Attorneys Representing Asylum Seekers (includes numerous free training webinars) UNHCR Guidance Report on LGBT Asylum Claims United Nations High Commission on Refugees USCIS Guidance on Adjudicating LGBT Asylum Claims University of Minnesota Human Rights Library / Refugee and Asylum Resources U.S. State Department Country Reports Women on the Run, UNHCR Report (resources for female asylum - seekers) Women's Human Rights Net Yale Law School's Refugee & Asylum Resources (includes several resources for gender - based asylum claims)

Such proceedings may be brought before the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) on a stand - alone basis (in which case, a complainant must prove an infringement of certain competition law rules) or on a follow - on basis (which requires an existing infringement decision from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the CAT on an appeal from a decision of the CMA or the European Commission).

In its decision in the 2009 HudBay proceedings, the Ontario Securities Commission noted that an adviser's success - based compensation may adversely affect the ability of a board to rely on financial advice: «a fairness opinion prepared by a financial adviser who is being paid a signing fee or a success fee does not assist directors comprising a special committee of independent directors in demonstrating the due care they have taken in complying with their fiduciary duties in approving a transaction.»

If the decision has been taken to set the date in accordance with Article 121 (3), the Council shall, on the basis of its recommendations referred to in Article 121 (2), acting by a qualified majority on a recommendation from the Commission, decide whether any, and if so which, Member States shall have a derogation as defined in paragraph 3 of this Article.

Regulations, directives and decisions adopted jointly by the European Parliament and the Council, and such acts adopted by the Council or the Commission, shall state the reasons on which they are based and shall refer to any proposals or opinions which were required to be obtained pursuant to this Treaty.

At that meeting, Paul Paton, one of the Commission's Reporters, stated that while no decision had yet been made, already «it appears that, based on the information collected thus far, the choice will be between Options 2 and 3.»

The Commission also explained that if a person applies to the Commission to review a notice of violation, then the Commission's decision regarding the alleged violation is based on a balance of probabilities.