INDIANAPOLIS — EdChoice, a national nonprofit organization that promotes state -
based educational choice programs, today released the findings of its 2017 «Schooling in America» national survey at an event in Washington, D.C..
Not exact matches
Drawing on an evaluation of the Montclair model and other research, the report concludes that school -
choice plans
based on magnet schools «appear most promising in meeting the
educational goals of achieving racial balance, providing quality education, and offering diverse
educational programs.»
Voucher
programs that give recipients the free and independent
choice of an array of providers, including faith -
based organizations, have a long and established history in Arizona, including six different
educational voucher
programs that help more than 22,000 students annually attend the public, private or religious school of their
choice.
The Supreme Court, in cases culminating in Agostini [v. Felton], has established the general principle that state
educational assistance
programs do not have the primary effect of advancing religion if those
programs provide public aid to both sectarian and nonsectarian institutions (1) on the
basis of neutral, secular criteria that neither favor nor disfavor religion; and (2) only as a result of numerous private
choices of the individual parents of school - age children.
That would be a vast upgrade from New Hampshire's income -
based tax - credit scholarship
program, and the result would be a nearly universal
educational choice program!
As a contrast, in Milwaukee's early targeted voucher
program (targeted to low - income families) parents stated that their
choices were
based on such matters as
educational quality, teaching approach and style, discipline in a choosen school, and atmosphere.
Flip through our complete summary of the high - quality empirical research conducted on school
choice programs to date, including evidence
based on students» test scores (of those using
programs and those who remain in public schools), long - term
educational attainment, integration / segregation, fiscal effects and students» civic values.
This legislation would ban FFELP lenders from discriminating against eligible borrowers
based on the borrower's
choice of an eligible
educational institution, length of the borrower's
program, academic year in school or the borrower's income.
Students conclude all three of the above
educational programs by sitting for the NCLEX - RN, which is computer -
based and primarily consists of multiple -
choice and fill - in - the - blank questions.