The position presented by the Great Barrier Reef Climate Change Alliance was that a 25 per cent reduction in emissions was needed by 2020, and that a market -
based emissions reduction policy should be the central approach.
Not exact matches
We lead a game - changing legal campaign seeking systemic, science -
based emissions reductions and climate recovery
policy at all levels of government.
They further question the claims that a pre-industrial or «below 350 ppm [carbon dioxide]» climate is necessarily more benign or less affected by extreme weather, and they warn that «unachievable» CO2
emissions reduction policies are at risk of being classified as «ill advised, ineffective, and disingenuous» if and / or when the public eventually recognizes how flimsy the evidence is upon which these
policies are
based.
In addition to the
Base Policy case, EIA's analysis includes several sensitivity cases encompassing different interpretations or implementations of the proposed rule as well as a scenario in which further
emissions reductions are required beyond 2030, all of which use the AEO2015 Reference case as their baseline.
The provisions will seek to ensure that credits from Community projects do not result in double - counting of
emission reductions nor impede other
policy measures to reduce
emissions not covered by the ETS, and that they are
based on simple, easily administered rules.
This technical document provides the following information: - An update of global greenhouse gas
emission estimates,
based on a number of different authoritative scientific sources; - An overview of national
emission levels, both current (2010) and projected (2020) consistent with current pledges and other commitments; - An estimate of the level of global
emissions consistent with the two degree target in 2020, 2030 and 2050; - An update of the assessment of the «
emissions gap» for 2020; - A review of selected examples of the rapid progress being made in different parts of the world to implement
policies already leading to substantial
emission reductions and how they can be scaled up and replicated in other countries, with the view to bridging the
emissions gap.
In support of the Paris Agreement, science -
based targets from leading companies demonstrate to
policy - makers the scale of
emission reductions that are achievable to positively influence international climate negotiations and domestic climate
policy.
This entry makes recommendations on how to respond to arguments against climate
policies based on claims that it would be unfair or ineffective if a nation makes significant
reductions in ghg
emissions if other nations such as China or India does not act,
I then made my pitch for a carbon fee - bate
policy which would place a carbon price on oil sands and other sources of carbon
emissions equivalent to that paid by firms in the EU and which, if implemented worldwide, would allow the world to meet science -
based emissions reduction targets.
None of the companies — BP Plc, Royal Dutch Shell Plc, Total SA, Statoil ASA, Eni SpA and BG Group — is
based in the U.S. Still, their argument should resonate in Washington: «Clear, stable, long - term»
policies that make carbon more expensive (the letter never uses the word «tax») are necessary to reduce uncertainty, stimulate investment and encourage the most efficient
reductions in
emissions.
Australia's
policies in the last six years have been
based on two demonstrably wrong propositions: (1) we can lead the world: show them the way and they will follow; and / or (2) the whole world will undertake serious
emissions reduction programs, we can't stand aside from that.
In concert with other BC
emissions reduction policies, the tax seems to have been successful in reducing fuel use, which has fallen by 19 % relative to the rest of Canada on a per - capita
basis.
«Differentiating the Burden World Wide - Global Burden Differentiation of GHG
Emissions Reductions Based on the Triptych Approach: A Preliminary Assessment,» Energy
Policy, Vol.
Strategies to curtail noxious
emissions before and during the Games presented an opportunity to study
emissions reduction physics and provide
policy makers a
basis of information to make future public health decisions.
The
basis of our disagreement with the majority report is its failure to recognise the importance of the constraint put on all future
emission reduction targets and
policies by Australia's carbon budget.
Climate models are being used to support
emissions reduction policies and as the
basis for projection of future regional climate variation for use in model -
based decision support systems.