If you think an individual story is a reasonable concept to
base your idea of a God off of, you're a knob.
Not exact matches
random is a mathematically sound
idea where as
god is a simple creation
of some MAN from long ago to explain the unexplainable
of the day... chaos theory is quantum physics 101 and is also
based solely on the notion
of random events... not to mention quantum uncertainty which is one
of my favorites.
Mr. Hawking wins easy battles against uneducated (in science) religious persons, but taking his statement on perspective, He is
based on assumptions with serious underlying problems, basically everything from mathematics, to the incompatibility
of quantum mechanics and relativity, and the lack
of proof and evidence for string theories, he is launching a very aggressive statement, probably his last effort on life to counter the anthropomorphic
ideas of God, and this is very common in all scientists.
And, Jeremy, would you please look at topic
of commonly - heard
ideas that may or may not have biblical
basis — one mentioned in these comments — is that
God chooses the time
of our death.
It is
based on the
idea, central to Christianity,
of the coming Kingdom
of God and the second coming
of Jesus Christ, and it involves an interpretation
of what
God requires
of man.
It seems all
of the questions progressivism answers are
based on the
idea that there's no
God.
It seems that the
idea of an inclusive church where people are loved and valued
based only on the fact that they are a unique creation
of God is threatening to those who thing they alone hold the real truth.
On this
basis, he fought tooth and nail against the moderates in the Southern Baptist Convention or any other part
of the evangelical world who rejected the
idea that the Bible was the Word
of God in favor
of the
idea that the Bible became the Word
of God in encounter or contained the Word
of God in some way.
It's simple: You don't get to say what marriage is or is not
based upon the bible or the so - called word
of god (whatever that is... think about that for a minute... unless you speak 1st century aramaic you have no
idea what the original writers
of the ficto - mythic texts you now presume as the word
of god even means!)
Second, if one does not believe in
God, any
idea of a world
based on radically different values seems simply utopian in the negative sense.
This
idea is
based on the concept
of progressive revelation, that
God has slowly explained Himself and unfolded His plan and purposes for the world over time.
Berry's
idea that we need a planetary socialism — indeed, an ultimate universal socialism — is
based on Aquinas's statement that because the divine goodness «could not be adequately represented by one creature alone, he [
God] produced many and diverse creatures, that what was wanting to one in the representation
of the divine might be supplied by another.»
The entire book
of 1 John is engaged in this
idea about good and evil, light and darkness, truth and error, and John is intent on showing his readers that
based on who
God is and what Jesus has done for all people, we can choose to live in love, light, and righteousness, rather than abide in hatred, darkness, and evil.
You're confused, Demuth.The
idea that «everyone is a child
of God «has no Biblical
basis whatsoever; who told you otherwise?Only those born again in Christ via the regenerative power
of the Holy Spirit are children
of God in the Bilical sense.If you are going to comment on biblical issues at least get your theology straight; otherwise you sound just as silly as the other
God - haters on this blog.
Based on this
idea of the church as a family, Richard Jacobson goes on to talk about church elders as facilitators, on how to carry out conflict resolution within the family
of God, and a whole host
of other related topics.
The aesthetic conception
of God in Sufi metaphysics was
based on the
idea of reciprocal love between
God and man.
And third, we intend to evaluate the pragmatic value, in terms
of the task
of ministry,
of Kaplan's
idea of God and that
of process theology
based on the philosophy
of Alfred North Whitehead.
All
of this is
based,
of course, in
ideas of justification by faith,
of the priesthood
of all believers,
of direct access to
God's forgiveness and mercy.
The
idea of god, and prayer for that matter, is
based on fear alone.
On that
basis, he contends that «ironically, people by getting rid
of the
idea of judgment and hell, try to make
God more loving, actually make him less.»
It is a decisive element
of the Christian
idea of freedom that it is not only dependent on
God and refers to him as the
basis of the freedom
of choice, but that it is also freedom before
God.
It seems to me that the strongest New Testament
basis for hope for society is to be seen in the broad implications
of this
idea that the redemptive power;
of the kingdom
of God are present in history.
An internet friend
of mine came up with a realization,
based on the
idea that our lives may be icons, or living embodiments,
of our relationship with the Triune
God.
to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought
based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an
idea — i state openly thats its only an
idea... if any one
of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an
idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm
of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that
god is real, provable, and most def.
For at least Jesus would not have repudiated such
ideas, since they are consistent with the typically Jewish belief in
God, which in general served as the
basis for Jesus» thought
of Him.
In this view, when the primitive
idea of God, which was
based on the personification
of powers
of nature, vanishes gradually behind the infinitude
of the causal sequence, the concept
of God gains in coherence and consistency in proportion as it achieves a firm position in connection with the claims and needs
of the human spirit, and becomes the «irreducible coefficient
of the achievement
of moral processes in self - consciousness.»
[1][2] It is a contemporary adaptation
of the traditional teleological argument for the existence
of God, presented by its advocates as «an evidence -
based scientific theory about life's origins» rather than «a religious -
based idea».
Hume showed that once one accepts the empiricist
idea that knowledge
of what is not our own experience comes to us only through the senses, there is no cognitive
basis for affirming
God's reality.
And later, he adds that «to employ arguments in science
based on statistical randomness and probability is not necessarily to «oppose» the
idea of chance to the existence
of God the Creator.»
January 31, 2012 at 9:19 am Report abuse o Chad @hippypoet «
god is an
idea, such an improbable
idea that many have, to make the
idea inarguably, said that the
idea is beyond human comprehension and so be doing remove the need but more importantly the ability to prove and so make it an untouchable notion
of truth all
based on an
idea... how is that different then being delusional?
god is an
idea, such an improbable
idea that many have, to make the
idea inarguably, said that the
idea is beyond human comprehension and so by doing remove the need but more importantly the ability to prove and so make it an untouchable notion
of truth all
based on an
idea... how is that different from being delusional?
This paper will examine the arguments on each side, indicate what the societal view implies about the nature
of God, and suggest an additional argument for the societal view
based on the
idea of God's freedom and faithfulness which this view implies.
You sciency - types do nt abandon your worldview even though the ancient greek scientific philosophy that we
base our western scientific tradition on, arose in a society founded on the belief in 12 capricious anthropomorphic
gods, an animistic «universe», and an unshakeable belief in the
idea of «fate».
Yes Fred, I will take my personal morality anytime rather than one
based one the
idea of an infallible
god that expects me to excuse the killing
of children.
Even though Christians must reject the Modern
idea that we human beings are the «makers»
of history, the covenantal
basis of our faith places upon humankind a participatory responsibility for the unfolding
of God's purposes.
If I read the recorded written words
of Jesus correctly the reason
God had to send a Savior was
based on this very
idea.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but one thing you seem to be
basing this pantheistic concept
of the «true»
God on the
idea that in order to «really» control something it must be a part
of / contained within the one doing the controlling.
You became an atheist when you were 10 years old,
based on
ideas of God that you learned in Sunday School.
Arrogance is reading the Work
of God and denying the truth in it when you have no
basis to deny it except the thoughts and
ideas of other mere mortal talking clay.
I happen to think that you have to work harder to make a case that Jesus wasn't
based on a real life person, but that isn't any endorsement whatsoever
of the
idea that he was a
god, or could do anything supernatural.
Hartshorne claims that, since all proofs have premises, Anselm's argument must be
based on the assumptions that faith is a real possibility and that the
idea of God is free
of inconsistencies.
The Movement for Married Clergy believes that advocates for clerical celibacy
base their views on notions
of cultic purity and an
idea that the love
of God is more readily accessible in the celibate life.
The whole organization
of priestly worship was
based on the
idea that it was necessary to be holy in order to approach
God.
From his obituary, Charles T. Beaird «was a «nontheist,» meaning in simplistic terms that the concept
of God was not among the
ideas on which he
based his beliefs — but that if you did, it was fine with him.»
Lastly, the
idea that all «religious» people, by which I assume you mean people who believe there is a
God, go to church, that sort
of thing, think only with a certain mindset, that is, a non scientific mindset, believing or disbelieving
based entirely on blind faith, and never facts, is shown wrong by people like G K Chesterton and especially C S Lewis.
Fred Phelps had founded the «Primitive Baptist» Church,
based in Topeka Kansas, in 1955,
based on the
idea that all calamities that befall the United States are a result
of God's wrath for the apparent acceptance
of homosexuality in American society.