Sentences with phrase «based on atheism»

«We should create law based on atheism.»

As I've stated before, I believe the ideology of progressivism / liberalism is based on atheism.

Not exact matches

No fantastical forces and beings in atheism, but religion is based on them.

What we * can * say, however, is that it's unlikely her atheism was based on the solid arguments and opinions that many atheists have come to realize.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

Religion and atheism are simply based on our Worldview and how we got there.

Zeus on the other hand has been proven real, he said so himself and he said everyone, all the other gods in other cultures are fakes...» = > upon what are you basing your positive belief (you slipped up there in acknowledging atheism requires a positive disbelief in a diety

Since Atheism is the absence of religion & isn't based on faith this ban only applies to religious groups & churches.

All these things are based on reason, logic and skepticism... NOT Atheism.

The universe is 13.7 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism The earth is 4.5 billion years old (cosmology: best estimate based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism Life emerged from non-life (Biogenesis theory... cause and process unknown)- nothing to do with Atheism Life spread and diversified through evolution (best available explanation)- nothing to do with Atheism Man evolved from common ape ancestor (evolution science)- nothing to do with Atheism Consciousness is an emergent property of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Emotions, memories and intelligence are functions of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Morals are emergent qualities of social animals (natural science)- nothing to do with Atheism

Mormons and Mormonism provides a beautiful argument for atheism, in giving a great example showing the nature of religious belief: Based on unreal fabrications, sprinkled with bizarre claims.

I asked the question to understand how (and if) it is possible to separate science from atheism in the minds of believers so we can truly discuss the concepts based on their evidentiary merits, not necessarily their philosophical implications if indeed there are any to be had.

Since atheism is based on evidence and believers says» * # % # & % # * the evidence, I trust faith,» there isn't much room for compromise.

Strictly based on the color of skin, or the religious orientation, it is atheism that suffers the most prejudice.

Strong atheism, to which I was referring, is an pro active ideology that in a nutshell rejects the possibility of the existence of God based on the presupposition that belief in such a being is logically contradictory.

Soviet policy toward religion was based on the ideology of Marxism - Leninism, which made atheism the official doctrine of the Soviet Union.

Her atheism was obviously never based on reason.

Well, on the single word, but based on what was discussed earlier it is clear that such statement is at least not always true — especially in the case of implicit atheism.

Her atheism must have never been based on reason and rationality but rather from something she went through her childhood to «hate god».

Communism was not a path of atheism based on reason and rationality but rather from an ideology that took its teachings from religious totalitarianism.

This is a poor ad - hominem argument, as these people did not kill anyone based on the idea of atheism.

hinduism racism is based on dog ism, atheism, self center ism, not of human but animals, identify Aatheism, self center ism, not of human but animals, identify AtheismAtheism.

The difference in the evangelism of atheism or science is that it's based on verifiable evidence to support those theories.

It's only exclusion when you try to turn atheism into this dogmatic struggle with any form of monotheism, with the same ridiculous notions of superiority based on human thinking and logic which are always proven wrong.

In order for atheism to be based on «faith» or «belief» it would have to positively assert something.

Problem with Christians is there are those that behave badly, problem with Science it can only study things in the now (Observation), problem with Atheism is morality is based on Judeo / Christian values.

Until you can do that, then your atheism is just another religion based on faith.

I have concluded based on scientific evidence atheism is false.

It is a crime to be borne as a female by hinduism racism as religion, based on hindu atheism, criminal self center ism, hindus, racist use women to extend their progeny, but they require female s parents to provide wealth as dowry, to get rich.

Mod is an action by a person in an environment, depending on legality or hinduism, illegality by hindu atheism, criminal self center ism, it has nothing to do with environment at large, as it is used today to define matters, because actions of a person are subject to scrutiny individually, not collectively, bases for call to treat individual acts as individually not collectively.

I have seen all the talk of atheism is based on what science can prove or disprove.

@ monoya: Definition of BELIEF 1: a state or habit of mind in which trust or confidence is placed in some person or thing 2: something believed; especially: a tenet or body of tenets held by a group 3: conviction of the truth of some statement or the reality of some being or phenomenon especially when based on examination of evidence Atheism easily fits within these parameters.

This is not unbelief or atheism, it is a testing of God on the basis of a standard of justice.

Your point is exactly what Einstein would have said, as a scientific question atheism is an ignorant response based on fear.

You don't seem to know much about current evolutionary theory nor atheism, based on this pathetic, simplistic, childish rant.

on the base of his atheism: «When I come to my own beliefs, I find myself quite unable to discern any purpose in the universe, and still more unable to wish to discern one» — as if that nondiscernment by his own sole self was sufficient for his sweeping, voluminous irreverence.

Atheism is based on clear minded objective observation of the real world.

It just seems to me that atheism is itself a religion, because it is based on beliefs just as much as Christianity.

atheism is based on the idea the religion is merely a business, no real god exists and therefore they take no part in it.

And guess what, atheism isn't based on faith because by definition, atheism is LACK OF FAITH in a deity.

Under atheism based solely on science, reason, logic and math, there is no such objective grounding.

Which has done more harm, I wonder — religious beliefs (always based on unprovable mythologies), or atheism.

Atheism is decidedly not a religion because it is not based on faith, which all religions are based upon.

While the Nazi party and the various ethnic cleansings in Armenia, the Balkans, and Africa were not really based upon atheism (thus making his argument that atheism has killed more folks than organized religion a bit shaky), ALL of the instances he mentions are bona - fide examples of almost incomprehensibly large numbers of deaths, NONE of which can be blamed, even remotely, on «organized religion.»

Otherwise the only alternative is that pure atheism isn't based on logic or reasoning but based on ignorance.

On the basis of these two ifs, a return to polytheism would have the edge over pantheism or atheism.

Atheism lacks a coherent moral base and could never stand on its own without religion.

Atheism is a rational conclusion based on the evidence that god's don't actually exist.

Radhakrishnan says, that secularism is based, not on irreligion or atheism, but on «the universality of spiritual values which may be attained by a variety of ways».

Perusing the index of Origins, the weekly publication of representative documents and speeches compiled by Catholic News Service, our imaginary historian will note, for example, the following initiatives undertaken at the national, diocesan and parish levels in 1994 - 95: providing alternatives to abortion; staffing adoption agencies; conducting adult education courses; addressing African American Catholics» pastoral needs; funding programs to prevent alcohol abuse; implementing a new policy on altar servers and guidelines for the Anointing of the Sick; lobbying for arms control; eliminating asbestos in public housing; supporting the activities of the Association of Catholic Colleges and Universities (227 strong); challenging atheism in American society; establishing base communities (also known as small faith communities); providing aid to war victims in Bosnia; conducting Catholic research in bioethics; publicizing the new Catechism of the Catholic Church; battling child abuse; strengthening the relationship between church and labor unions; and deepening the structures and expressions of collegiality in the local and diocesan church.