Sentences with phrase «based on atheist»

your entire religion based on an Atheist's storybook No doubt this Charles Darwin was made up as well.

I am however not for the total and complete removal of religion from the site based on the atheist group, your infringing upon all those who do believe in a religion.

Not exact matches

true but atheist never killed anyone or started wars or try to make laws restricting rights based on their beliefs as all the other stupid religions do... thats the problem.

Most Atheists would argue that they do not fall into either of those definitions, as they reject religion and they generally demand that belief is based on proof.

What we * can * say, however, is that it's unlikely her atheism was based on the solid arguments and opinions that many atheists have come to realize.

There is much that could be said about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their premise is false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.

When an atheist can explain how the universe came into being from absolutely nothing (no vacuum, no electromagnetic forces, no anything), or how the first life form came together and started functioning based on random chemical reactions, I'll start to take them seriously.

you believe in a narrow view of a god based on ancient fairy tales and that if you adhere to the teachings of a supposed son of god you will go to disneyland in the sky forever... which is damm ridiculous... I consider myself an atheist but I am aware of the possibility of a creative force which created the universe... but that god chatted with people 2000 years ago and brought out a book is childish and stoopid!

How do atheists explain the obvious benefit, both economically, educationally, socially, and spiritually, that America receives when its people are walking with God, ministering through church and missions, and creating and basing laws and moral conduct on Biblical teachings?

on the topic of proof — we atheists need not prove the lack of existence of something that has no impact on our daily lives, however those that believe based purely on the idea of somethings existence is a bit disconcerting!

I know it is comforting to think that, and by all means, if it makes life for you easier, then fine, believe... but you can not logically argue with Atheists and expect not to look foolish on the subject matter because your belief is not based on logic.

Assumptions along these lines are what atheists hang their hats on, but assumptions lead to false reasoning, and in any case, they base their view on beliefs, even though they don't recognize it as a belief.

So this «attack on religious freedom» is based on a hypothetical fear that atheists will join a religious organization, work their way up the ranks to leadership, and then destroy the group from the inside out?

Atheists believe things based on reality and / or science.

Mearly that the specific moral code that atheists in the West espouse is based on 2,000 years of Christian teaching in Europe.

Atheists are a tiny minority having to deal with Christianity being shoved in their faces on a daily basis.

What is amusing to me is that when an atheist claims to be «good» without God, they are generally basing their judgement of right and wrong on Western European value systems.

In that light, what's really new about the New Atheists is their reliance on an oxymoron: they actually seem to believe in a utopian Darwinism» a faith - based science if there ever was one.

But first of all, as an atheist, you have probably said the Bible is just a book of myths and lies and fairytales in the first place, so why are you basing your arguement on it?»

Too often, when Christians make appeals to atheists or agnostics, they fall back on emotional, faith - based language: «When I trust in the Lord...,» «God has been so good to me...,» etc..

But saying all atheists are bitter or f «ed up losers is like saying all christians are blood thirsty murderers based on the crusades Salem witch trials, or wars in Ireland..

I'll tell you what: how about you stop acting like those atheists (who do not represent all atheists, by the way), and desist in painting an entire body of belief (or lack thereof) based on the actions of its most militant and aggressive members?

Most would judge a person based on his or her actions, so a kind Christian would be a «better» person than a jerk of an atheist, and vice versa.

please don't group atheists based on one persons statement or even a group of them each person is different despite all the classifications we use to separate ourselves.

Atheist morality is without any objective basis and, if followed with integrity, doesn't allow them to act against others who act contrary to their moral system (as they insist that each subjective moral judgment is equal in value, all being based purely on individual feelings).

@Patrick I am an atheist, so this is not based on any religious belief.

I wish we could have a logic - based atheist as a leader instead of having to rely on these nutcase skymonster believers.

I think it says that atheists don't discriminate on people on the basis of what they imagine some god wants.

On a daily basis from atheists on comment boardOn a daily basis from atheists on comment boardon comment boards.

I can't find any respect for atheists — I hate to make sweeping generalizations but based on the comments in this blog, I would call them them most hateful, self - centered & self - absorbed people I have ever encountered.

Watson and Crick were avowed atheists, therefore all science based on the understanding of DNA is evil!

Why should atheists stay away while the religious fanatics are trying to bash a reasonable secular belief system based on science and education??

I'm going to say pro-life and anti-gay marriage because I believe you'd be hard - pressed to find an atheist who believes it is okay to deny women control over their own reproductive health and the ability to decide whether or not to carry a pregnancy to term or, likewise, who believes it's okay to deny marriage to a couple based only on gender orientation.

If I have to choose a side between atheist and non-atheist based on your definition, I choose neither.

Interesting that atheists hold high the APA when they claim ho - m0 $ exuals are normal based on criteria of mental stability and socially adjusted behavior yet are mum to Christians, Jews and other believers normal according to APA standards.

We can't be very good Atheists if we're not making our decision based on the best information available, can we?

Because if you read through the comments in these blogs, you'll notice that what many atheists despise the most is when the extremely fundamentally religious judge their fellow man based on their exaggerated interpretation of the Bible, neither of which they can credibly give justification for.

The Atheist indicts god based solely on what happens in what is, cosmologically speaking, the blink of an eye.

About the only difference between religious tradition and being an atheist is all the crap that an atheist has to filter on a daily basis.

Atheists refuse to accept the potential existence of any kind of deity simply based on the faith of the presenter.

I find it odd that the atheists like to roll that one out almost on a daily basis, but hardly ever use it correctly.

GW can be a christian yes but there are some people who are catholics and christians and jehovas and atheist and so on that don't understand their wrong doing, saying God is on my side to go ahead and kill millions of innocent woman and children based on lies while the truth is for oil, that's not a real christian in my book, There's plenty of serial killers out there that says they've heard God telling them to kill.

I am an atheist and base my decision solely on logic and reason, which dictates that there is no god, and no offense, but particularly yours.

@Live4Him, «Then you must admit that those so - called atheists on this forum are a form of «faith - based skepticism».»

I simply can't support or buy into the theories of atheists based on a comment I once herd from a friend of mine who happens to be an atheist.

I've heard predictions based on trends that range from 15 years to 40 years (I think 25 years sounds about right) where atheists will outnumber Christians in this country.

Then you must admit that those so - called atheists on this forum are a form of «faith - based skepticism».

Atheists do nt have «faith», they have beliefs based on evidence.

An atheist's belief system is based on logic, evidence and common sense.

They then try to show to the atheists proofs for the existence of God based on reason alone, so they claim.