They then reduce the information into their own words and then transform this into an image, before creating some multiple choice questions
based on cosmology.
In a recent interview with Gary Gutting for the New York Times, Tim Maudlin, professor of philosophy at NYU, rejects arguments
based on cosmology that seek to show that human beings have any special place: «No one looking at the vast extent of the universe and the completely random location of homo sapiens within it (in both space and time) could seriously maintain that the whole thing was intentionally created for us.
Not exact matches
Clearly, contemporary
cosmology and evolutionary biology require the rejection of certain accounts of creation
based on literalistic readings of Genesis.
The universe is 13.7 billion years old (
cosmology: best estimate
based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism The earth is 4.5 billion years old (
cosmology: best estimate
based on available data)- nothing to do with Atheism Life emerged from non-life (Biogenesis theory... cause and process unknown)- nothing to do with Atheism Life spread and diversified through evolution (best available explanation)- nothing to do with Atheism Man evolved from common ape ancestor (evolution science)- nothing to do with Atheism Consciousness is an emergent property of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Emotions, memories and intelligence are functions of the brain (neuroscience)- nothing to do with Atheism Morals are emergent qualities of social animals (natural science)- nothing to do with Atheism
Ancient
cosmologies were developed
on the
basis of phenomenal observations of the world — that is, things as they appeared to everyday observation.
Apparently the interpretations of currently available cosmological data are more controverted than one would surmise
on the
basis of Craig's account of recent
cosmology.
Well William,
based on how they reacted to evolution, abiogenesis, modern
cosmology and every other advance of knowledge sich Bronze Age Palestine, what do you think?
Basing her claims
on this evidence for Inflation and Gravity Waves, only shows that she doesn't understand
cosmology and how the pieces fit together.
I don't mean high school, I don't mean science magazines, I don't mean recreational literature like Richard Dawkins books, I mean if you actually ever sit dow for a few months, got the basic bibliography
on its history, gathered the basic bibliography
on the astrophysics and
cosmology its
based, and understood where it came from and what problem it proposes to solve?
The first results of these metaphysical inquiries can be found in the five books of the manuscript «Notes towards a Metaphysic» (written from September 1933 till May 1934), in which he makes an endeavor to construct a cosmological - metaphysical system of his own, 5 following the example of Whitehead's and Alexander's description of reality as a process, but
based on his method elaborated in An Essay
on Philosophical Method, 6 and in «Sketch of a Cosmological Theory,» the first (never published)
cosmology conclusion to The Idea of Nature.
Whitehead's
cosmology is
based on a double foundation: time - space,
on the one hand, and what he (in Process and Reality) calls «eternal objects,»
on the other.
But «we do not analyse
cosmology from the perspective of an explicitly theistic stance
based on some dogmatic propositions of God's existence; rather we proceed cautiously from what we call theological commitment as an existential, experiential mode of communion with God» (p. 24).
However, a
cosmology based strictly
on the thought of Whitehead seems to have no place for a true end (finis) or beginning; the world is an endless process of becoming, and there is no being that is not becoming.
But this was
based on the particular, not the general, and consciousness of this drove James always, in effect, to say, «If another
cosmology works better for you, then you treat that as true instead.»
Protestant theology believed that it could rely
on the «personalist» relation of the I - Thou kind and develop
on this
basis a theocentric personalism that would escape the difficulties of a natural theology in the Catholic vein, a natural theology considered as a hypostasis of
cosmology.
To
base a
cosmology on a set theory is to cling to the past and to give hostage to future research.
This relativistic
cosmology has clarified the claims to effectiveness of
cosmology based on mathematically formulated natural science and has allowed a pluralism of perspectives
on and theories of the world (cf. 2.1).
Scientists use them as a kind of mile marker for
cosmology, measuring our universe's expansion
based on the explosion's brightness: The dimmer it appears, the farther away it must be.
In addition, presentations given earlier this week at a
cosmology conference in Moscow,
based on observations from the European Space Agency's Planck satellite add fresh evidence that what BICEP2 could be entirely due to a confounding effect of dust.
Modern
cosmology is
based on Einstein's theory for gravity.
The design is
based on te principles of Balinese
cosmology.
These constructions are
based on the image of the house as a metaphor for the human body or human
cosmology.
«Metaphysical
cosmology seeks to draw intuitive conclusions about the nature of the universe, man, a supernatural creator, and / or their relationships
based on the extension of some set of presumed facts borrowed from spiritual experience and / or observation.»
The duo's work is
based on an extensive reflexion around symbiotic engineering and global mutations, using augmented materiality and film as a way to approach the relationships between metaphysical
cosmology, high - end technology and biomimetic evolutionary process.
Many of these LA -
based works were infused with a non-Western spirituality that spoke to the transcendence of black life through time and space: Saar (the subject of a single room) had meditated
on questions of
cosmology and astrology, inviting viewers to participate in leaving spiritual offerings at the foot of the work; Senga Nengudi performed African spirituals under a freeway, dressing concrete pillars in different pantyhose to represent male and female characters.
The 1957 B2FH paper,
based in large part
on two 1946 papers by Fred Hoyle [3,4], became the Bible of stellar physics and Big Bang
cosmology.
Actually, very little in
Cosmology is
based on falsifiable science.
After all, we never trained them
on the competing plasma -
based cosmologies.