Lead -
based paint exposure has been linked to a host of physical and mental health problems.
The Department of Housing and Urban Development sponsors research on the effects of lead -
based paint exposure and other housing - related health hazards.
Not exact matches
Lead
based paint and lead in household dust remain a more significant
exposure for children, but you still might want to check out your diaper bag.
Based on this the team has produced a «high risk» map showing regions of the
painting that contain light - sensitive pigments that need to be monitored closely and protected from light
exposure.
«There are only a few countries using leaded gasoline, so the majority of the
exposures are from lead -
based paint, lead battery production and hazardous waste sites,» Trasande said.
Most
exposure comes from old, deteriorating lead -
based paint, which was banned in 1978.
It's best for your
paintings if they are rotated on a regular
basis to give them periodic protection from light
exposure.
But they nest in soil that has been contaminated by decades of lead -
based paint, and the
exposure causes a neurological disorder called «droopwing» in which the chicks are unable to lift their wings.
The oil from the fruits («seeds») dries on
exposure to air (similar to linseed oil) and is sometimes used in the manufacturing of oil -
based paints, or for cooking.
These three were chosen
based on their potential for human
exposures through their widespread use in many foods and consumer products — like toothpastes, cosmetics, sunscreens, coatings, and
paints — and because of their potential to wind up in treated drinking water.
Children may be exposed to and injured by
exposure to lead
paint or varnish as a result of coming into contact with lead -
based paint or varnish covered furniture or woodwork in a building owned by someone other than the children's parents.
If your child has suffered illness or injury from
exposure to lead -
based paint or varnish, contact child
paint and varnish injury lawyer Jeffrey Killino at 877-875-2927 for experienced and knowledgeable assistance with your case.
An individual in whose care a child has been entrusted may be found liable for injuries sustained by the child from
exposure to lead -
based paint or varnish if the child's
exposure and resultant injuries are determined to have been caused by the individual's negligence.
Team, Ltd., 88 NY2d 628 [establishing landlords» regulatory liability for childhood lead poisoning under NYC Local Law 1], Munoz v. Puretz 301 AD2d 382 [liability of landlord for prenatal
exposure to lead
based paint suffered by the unborn child of a tenant], Zaman v. Patwary 295 AD2d 424 [notice of child under Local Law 1], Perez v. New York City Housing Authority, 304 AD2d 736 [collateral estoppel effect of DOH lead
paint violations] and has obtained for his clients millions of dollars in verdicts and settlements.
During that time, our firm has fought and won precedent setting and landmark cases including having successfully litigated the case which established the regulatory liability of a landlord for childhood lead poisoning in New York City and the liability of a landlord for prenatal
exposure of an unborn child to lead
based paint.
Toxic Torts: Ms. Sedney continues to represent clients in cases involving claims of
exposure to lead -
based paint, pesticides, molds, asbestos and other toxic substances.
For older buildings, another option is liability coverage for claims resulting from
exposure to lead -
based paint.
Exposure can occur from deteriorating lead -
based paint, pipes, or lead - contaminated dust or soil.
A Maryland appellate court has considered whether a real estate licensee representing the landlord in a leasing transaction has any duty under that state's lead -
based paint law to protect a tenant from
exposure to lead -
based paint.
According to the EPA, homes built prior to 1978 may have lead -
based paint, which could result in a number of negative health defects after extended
exposure.
Based on this language, the Tenants argued that the Leasing Representative fell within the Act's definition of an owner and thus owed a duty to protect the Tenants from exposure to lead - based p
Based on this language, the Tenants argued that the Leasing Representative fell within the Act's definition of an owner and thus owed a duty to protect the Tenants from
exposure to lead -
based p
based paint.
The Tenants argued that Maryland's Lead
Paint Act («Act») requires property owners to take preventive measures to protect tenants from
exposure to lead -
based paint.